Ultrasound Using the Transverse Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Reliable Landmarks for Labor Epidurals

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound imaging of the spine has recently been proposed to facilitate identification of the epidural space. In this study, we assessed the accuracy and precision of the transverse approach, using a “single-screen” method, to facilitate labor epidurals. METHODS: We enrolled 61 patients requesting labor epidurals. Ultrasound imaging (transverse approach, 2–5 MHz curved array probe) identified the midline, the intervertebral space, and the distance from the skin to the epidural space (ultrasound depth/UD). During the epidural puncture, we recorded the success of the insertion point, and measured the distance to the epidural space to the nearest half-centimeter of the marked Tuohy needle (needle depth/ND). We calculated the agreement between UD and ND by the concordance correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: The average maternal age was 33 ± 4.6 yr, body mass index 29.7 ± 4.8, UD 4.66 ± 0.68 cm, and ND 4.65 ± 0.72 cm. The success of the insertion point was 91.8%, with no need to redirect the needle in 73.8% of the patients. The concordance correlation coefficient between UD and ND was 0.881 (95% CI 0.820–0.942). The 95% limits of agreement were −0.666 to 0.687 cm. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good level of success in the ultrasound-determined insertion point, and very good agreement between UD and ND. This suggests that our proposed ultrasound single-screen method, using the transverse approach, can be a reliable guide to facilitate labor epidural insertion.

[1]  B. Finucane,et al.  Determination of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in obstetric patients. , 1999, Regional anesthesia and pain medicine.

[2]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  V M Chinchilli,et al.  A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  T. Grau,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging Facilitates Localization of the Epidural Space During Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia , 2000, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[5]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[6]  Thomas Grau,et al.  Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  L. Watterson,et al.  The training environment of junior anaesthetic registrars learning epidural labour analgesia in Australian teaching hospitals , 2007, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[8]  D. Carr,et al.  Agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from numeric rating scores of pain intensity and those reported by patients with acute or cancer pain , 2003, Pain.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  T. Grau,et al.  Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[11]  Thomas Grau,et al.  Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. , 2002, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Frölich,et al.  Pioneers in Epidural Needle Design , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  S. Segal,et al.  A Multivariate Model to Predict the Distance From the Skin to the Epidural Space in an Obstetric Population , 1996, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[15]  C. Collier Why obstetric epidurals fail: a study of epidurograms. , 1996, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[16]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[18]  C. Yu,et al.  Review article: Obesity in pregnancy , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  A. Hedayat,et al.  Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement , 2002 .

[20]  B. Mercer,et al.  Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.