Cell-Orch: Towards End-to-End Orchestration of Multi-domain 5G Networks

Network operators are architecting fifth generation (SG) mobile communication networks with the promises of delivering faster, safer, and smarter wireless services. 5G network architectures embrace current trends in virtualization and software-defined infrastructure (SDI). The 5G Public Private Partnership (5GPPP) proposed a multi-domain architecture for end-to-end service orchestration in multi-operator environments, however, cellular network operators are a natural competitors. Although the scientific community has demonstrated that multi-operator federated systems are possible in practice, the adoption of this type of architecture for cellular network operators will be slower. In this paper we propose Cell-Orch, an architecture for end-to-end service orchestration in multi-operator environments that leverages SDI and allows stakeholders to verify whether their configurations have been effectively provisioned. We discuss how SDI will promote agile programmability of cellular networks, general transparency, and transparency of inter-domain transactions all while enabling end-to-end configuration verification. Furthermore, Cell-Orch provides additional functionalities to allow cellular network operators to build more resilient infrastructures in the same way the Cloud provided analogous capabilities to enterprise IT.

[1]  Russell Clark,et al.  SDX architectures: A qualitative analysis , 2016, SoutheastCon 2016.

[2]  Xin Li,et al.  Network Slicing for 5G: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, IEEE Internet Computing.

[3]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Vishnu Shukla,et al.  Emerging transport SDN architecture and use cases , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Distributed management of service-enabled flow-paths across multiple SDN domains , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC).

[6]  James Kempf,et al.  Fostering rapid, cross-domain service innovation in operator networks through Service Provider SDN , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Fabrice Guillemin,et al.  Towards a dynamic adaptive placement of virtual network functions under ONAP , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN).

[8]  Xian Zhang,et al.  Packet Optical Integration (POI) Use Cases for Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN) , 2016 .

[9]  Yezid Donoso,et al.  Checking Multi-domain Policies in SDN , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[10]  Donald A. Cox,et al.  Benefits brought by the use of OpenFlow/SDN on the AmLight intercontinental research and education network , 2015, 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM).

[11]  Guido Maier,et al.  SDN-based network orchestration for new dynamic Enterprise Networking services , 2017, 2017 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[12]  Henry Owen,et al.  FAS: Federated Auditing for Software-defined exchanges , 2017, SoutheastCon 2017.

[13]  Jim Esch,et al.  Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey , 2015, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Olivier Barais,et al.  Verifying the configuration of virtualized network functions in software defined networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN).

[15]  Leonardo Mariani,et al.  CloudHealth: A Model-Driven Approach to Watch the Health of Cloud Services , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Health (SoHeal).