Rapid quantitative mineral and phase analysis using automated scanning electron microscopy (QemSCAN); potential applications in forensic geoscience

Abstract QemSCAN is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) system, initially designed to support the mining industry by providing rapid automated quantitative mineral analyses. The system is based upon Carl Zeiss SEMs fitted with up to four light-element energy dispersive X-ray spectrometers. Representative subsamples are mounted into either resin or wax blocks and polished prior to analysis, or can be mounted onto carbon tape. During analysis, X-ray spectra are collected at a user-defined pixel spacing and are acquired very rapidly (c. 10 ms per pixel). The measured spectra are automatically compared against a database of known spectra and a mineral or phase name is assigned to each measurement point by the QemSCAN computer software programs. In this way the near-surface qualitative elemental composition of each particle is systematically mapped, assigned to a mineral name or chemical compound/species, and digital pixel maps of each particle are created. Depending upon a range of parameters, including the particle size and the user-defined pixel spacing (which can vary between 0.20 μm and 25 μm), approximately 1000 particles, each 1–10 μm in size, can be measured per hour using a 1 μm pixel spacing. In addition to providing a qualitative elemental analysis and mineralogical or phase assignment for each particle, data relating to particle size, shape and calculated specific density are also generated. In this study, the potential application of this automated SEM system in forensic geoscience was evaluated by the analysis of: (1) a series of soil samples, and (2) a series of dust samples from an industrial complex. In both case studies, the mine-ralogy/phase composition of each sample analysed was found to be distinctive. In addition, textural data for the soil samples and particle shape data for the dust samples show that they can be clearly distinguished. Automated SEM using QemSCAN has clear potential application in the analysis of soil or other trace evidence in forensic case work.

[1]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Characterisation of airborne particles in London by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy , 1999 .

[2]  P Margot,et al.  Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[3]  Z. Brożek-Mucha,et al.  Evaluation of the possibility of differentiation between various types of ammunition by means of GSR examination with SEM-EDX method. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[4]  K. Pye,et al.  Petrographic Examination of Sedimentary Rocks in the Sem Using Backscattered Electron Detectors , 1984 .

[5]  K. Pye,et al.  Backscattered Scanning Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: Shales , 1998 .

[6]  D. Sutherland,et al.  Application of automated quantitative mineralogy in mineral processing , 1991 .

[7]  A. Brown,et al.  The combined use of pollen and soil analyses in a search and subsequent murder investigation. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  Koichi Matsuoka,et al.  Mode of occurrence of calcium in various coals , 2002 .

[9]  Dennis C. Ward.  Use of an X-Ray Spectral Database in Forensic Science , 2000 .

[10]  W. J. Graves.  A Mineralogical Soil Classification Technique for the Forensic Scientist , 1979 .

[11]  M. Dettmann,et al.  Palynological analyses of Australian surface soils and their potential in forensic science , 1996 .

[12]  G. Rollinson,et al.  The spatial distribution and source of arsenic, copper, tin and zinc within the surface sediments of the Fal Estuary, Cornwall, UK , 2003 .

[13]  K. Galbreath.  Collaborative study of quantitative coal mineral analysis using computer-controlled scanning electro , 1996 .

[14]  K. Walsh,et al.  Fine Resolution of Pollen Patterns in Limited Space: Differentiating a Crime Scene and Alibi Scene Seven Meters Apart , 1999 .

[15]  Y. Marumo,et al.  Clay Mineralogical Analysis Using the <0.05-mm Fraction for Forensic Science Investigation—Its Application to Volcanic Ash Soils and Yellow-Brown Forest Soils , 1986 .

[16]  M. Mcvicar,et al.  The Forensic Comparison of Soils by Automated Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1997 .

[17]  W. H. Gibb,et al.  The distribution of mineral matter in pulverised coal particles in relation to burnout behaviour , 1997 .

[18]  K. Pye.  Forensic examination of rocks, sediments, soils and dusts using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray chemical microanalysis , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[19]  R. Sugita,et al.  Validity of color examination for forensic soil identification , 1996 .

[20]  Y. Marumo,et al.  Screening of soil evidence by a combination of simple techniques: validity of particle size distribution. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[21]  S. Cengiz,et al.  SEM-EDS analysis and discrimination of forensic soil. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[22]  K. Pye,et al.  Mudrocks examined by backscattered electron microscopy , 1983, Nature.

[23]  L. Garofano,et al.  Gunshot residue: Further studies on particles of environmental and occupational origin , 1999 .

[24]  D. Morrow.  Backscattered scanning electron microscopy and image analysis of sediments and sedimentary rocks , 2000 .

[25]  Stephen Humphries,et al.  Green and Pleasant Land , 1999 .

[26]  K. Walsh,et al.  Forensic Palynology: Variation in the Pollen Content of Soil on Shoes and in Shoeprints in Soil , 1999 .

[27]  Lian Zhang,et al.  CCSEM analysis of ash from combustion of coal added with limestone , 2002 .

[28]  H Demmelmeyer,et al.  Forensic Investigation of Soil and Vegetable Materials. , 1995, Forensic science review.