Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards

This paper analyses the choice of a farmer to be an innovator, an early adopter or a laggard (an adopter of mature technologies or a non-adopter) in the adoption of innovations that are available on the market. We estimate a nested logit model with data from a large sample of Dutch farmers. We find that structural characteristics (farm size, market position, solvency, age of the farmer) explain the difference in adoption behaviour between innovators and early adopters on the one hand and laggards on the other. We also find that early adopters and innovators do not differ from each other regarding these structural characteristics. However, they appear to differ in behavioural characteristics : innovators make more use of external sources of information and they are more involved in the actual development of innovations.

[1]  David L. Sunding,et al.  The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector , 1999 .

[2]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[3]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Rank, Stock, Order And Epidemic Effects In The Diffusion Of New Process Technologies : An Empirical Model , 1990 .

[4]  Ruifa Hu,et al.  Biotechnology boosts to crop productivity in China: trade and welfare implications , 2004 .

[5]  G. O'Mara,et al.  Farm Size and the Diffusion of Green Revolution Technology , 1981, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[7]  Mita Bhattacharya,et al.  Determinants of Innovation , 2004 .

[8]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey , 1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[9]  S. Davies The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[10]  Alan L. Olmstead,et al.  Induced Innovation in American Agiculture: A Reconsideration , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economics of Technological Diffusion , 2001 .

[12]  M. Lipton Agricultural finance and rural credit in poor countries , 1976 .

[13]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[14]  K. Hoff The economics of rural organization : theory, practice, and policy / ed by Karla Hoff … [et al] , 1993 .

[15]  H. Meijl,et al.  Modernisation in Agriculture: What Makes a Farmer Adopt an Innovation? , 2002 .

[16]  Michael Trant,et al.  Adoption and Diffusion of New Technology in Agriculture: Genetically Modified Corn and Soybeans , 2002 .

[17]  David Zilberman,et al.  Stochastic structure, farm size, and technology adoption in developing agriculture , 1983 .

[18]  P. Diederen,et al.  Innovation and Farm Performance: The case of Dutch Agriculture , 1999 .

[19]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[20]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[21]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[22]  Mark Montgomery A nested logit model of the choice of a graduate business school , 2002 .

[23]  J. V. Pischke When is smallholder credit necessary , 1978 .

[24]  D. McFadden Econometric analysis of qualitative response models , 1984 .

[25]  Modelling choice and switching behaviour between Scottish ski centres , 2000 .

[26]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[27]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economic Analysis of Technological Change , 1983 .

[28]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[29]  Gershon Feder,et al.  Farm size, risk aversion, and the adoption of new technology under uncertainty. , 1980 .

[30]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[31]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[32]  Richard K. Perrin,et al.  Impediments to Technical Progress on Small versus Large Farms , 1976 .

[33]  Erik Brouwer,et al.  Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators , 1996 .