An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes

This article focuses on the construction, description and testing of a theoretical model of problem posing. We operationalize procesess that are frequently described in problem solving and problem posing literature in order to generate a model. We name these processes editing quantitative information, their meanings or relationships, selecting quantitative information, comprehending and organizing quantitative information by giving it meaning or creating relations between provided information, and translating quantitative information from one form to another. The validity and the applicability of the model is empirically tested using five problem-posing tests with 143 6th grade students in Cyprus. The analysis shows that three different categories of students can be identified. Category 1 students are able to respond only to the comprehension tasks. Category 2 students are able to respond to both the comprehension and translation tasks, while Category 3 students are able to respond to all types of tasks. The results of the study also show that students are more successful in first posing problems that involve comprehending processes, then translation processes and finally editing and selecting processes.

[1]  Stephen I. Brown,et al.  The Art of Problem Posing , 1983 .

[2]  Thomas Lowrie Designing a Framework for Problem Posing: Young Children Generating Open-Ended Tasks , 2002 .

[3]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[4]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Children's Problem Posing within Formal and Informal Contexts. , 1998 .

[5]  J. Mestre Probing adults' conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing , 2002 .

[6]  Philip Clarkson,et al.  Language Factors in Mathematics Teaching and Learning , 1996 .

[7]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  The Nature and Use of Open Problems in Mathematics Education: Mathematical and Pedagogical Perspectives. , 1995 .

[8]  Todd Lubart,et al.  The Role of Flexibility in Innovation , 2003 .

[9]  Jinfa Cai An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving , 1998 .

[10]  Graham Alfred Jones,et al.  Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning , 2005 .

[11]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Combinatorics And The Development Of Children's Combinatorial Reasoning , 2005 .

[12]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  International handbook of mathematics education , 1997 .

[13]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  An Analysis of Arithmetic Problem Posing by Middle School Students. , 1996 .

[14]  Sandra P. Marshall Schemas in Problem Solving: Schemas and assessment , 1995 .

[15]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[16]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[17]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas Lowrie FREE PROBLEM-POSING: YEAR 3/4 STUDENTS CONSTRUCTING PROBLEMS FOR FRIENDS TO SOLVE , 1999 .

[19]  Harold L. Schoen,et al.  Teaching mathematics through problem solving , 2003 .

[20]  Lyn D. English,et al.  The Development of Fifth-Grade Children's Problem-Posing Abilities , 1997 .

[21]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[22]  E. Silver On Mathematical Problem Posing. , 1994 .

[23]  Bharath Sriraman,et al.  Mathematical Giftedness, Problem Solving, and the Ability to Formulate Generalizations: The Problem-Solving Experiences of Four Gifted Students , 2003 .

[24]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[25]  Ken Winograd Writing, solving and sharing original math story problems : case studies of fifth-grade children's cognitive behavior , 1991 .