From Field Data to Ecosystem Services Maps: Using Regressions for the Case of Deforested Areas Within the Amazon

Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services (ES) is seen as one way to improve decision making and land management to better integrate environmental issues. This study aimed to characterize ES supply in deforestation context where an improvement of scientific knowledge should help develop more efficient environmental management. For three case studies in the Brazilian Amazon impacted by deforestation, seven indicators of potential ES supply were mapped at a spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m: biodiversity index (indicator of food web support); richness of pollinators (pollination); index of soil chemical quality (support to production); water available for plants (water regulation); soil carbon stocks (support to production and climate regulation); rate of water infiltration into the soil (soil erosion control); and vegetation carbon stocks (climate regulation). To map these indicators, in situ measurements of ES for 135 sampling points and remote sensing data were linked using regression methods. These methods were used to predict ES values and identify environmental factors that influence ES supply. The resulting maps help in understanding the influence of environmental factors on ES spatial distribution within the sites. The analyses illustrate the influence of land-use changes on ES supply and the role of context effects due to the heterogeneity of the biophysical environment, the temporality of deforestation and/or their diversified sociopolitical contexts. From a methodological viewpoint, the study highlights the importance of choices inherent in all cartographic practices and that need to be considered, especially in the context of rendering ES maps operational.

[1]  Yang Bai,et al.  Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed , 2011 .

[2]  M. Patterson,et al.  A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils , 2010 .

[3]  P. Oliveira,et al.  Moth pollination of woody species in the Cerrados of Central Brazil: a case of so much owed to so few? , 2004, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[4]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  The influence of land-use changes on soil hydraulic properties: Implications for runoff generation , 2006 .

[5]  B. Nelson,et al.  Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon , 1999 .

[6]  J. Godar,et al.  Who is responsible for deforestation in the Amazon? A spatially explicit analysis along the Transamazon Highway in Brazil , 2012 .

[7]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services ): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. , 2009 .

[8]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows , 2013 .

[9]  S. Dufour,et al.  Political ecology des services écosystémiques , 2014 .

[10]  Philip M Fearnside,et al.  Amazon Forest maintenance as a source of environmental services. , 2008, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[11]  Yang Bai,et al.  Modeling soil conservation, water conservation and their tradeoffs: a case study in Beijing. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[12]  A. Marshall,et al.  Measuring, modeling and mapping ecosystem services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania , 2011 .

[13]  P. Pingali,et al.  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being , 2005 .

[14]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Valuing map validation: The need for rigorous land cover map accuracy assessment in economic valuations of ecosystem services , 2015 .

[15]  Jeffrey J. Gerwing.  Degradation of forests through logging and fire in the eastern Brazilian Amazon , 2002 .

[16]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[17]  V. Gond,et al.  UTILISATION DE LA TÉLÉDÉTECTION ET DE DONNÉES SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUES ET ÉCOLOGIQUES POUR COMPRENDRE L'IMPACT DES DYNAMIQUES DE L'OCCUPATION DES SOLS A PACAJÀ (BRÉSIL) , 2012 .

[18]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[19]  Marc Pansu,et al.  Handbook of Soil Analysis: Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods , 2006 .

[20]  C. Larrère.  Penser et agir avec la nature , 2015 .

[21]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[22]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[24]  B. Hubert,et al.  Modernité écologique et services écosystémiques , 2014 .

[25]  E. Sabourin.  Fronts pionniers d'Amazonie. Les dynamiques paysannes au Brésil , 2008 .

[26]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Graham Jewitt,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – A review , 2015 .

[28]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[29]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[30]  Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne,et al.  The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[31]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[32]  Eduardo S. Brondizio,et al.  A dynamic model of household decision-making and parcel level landcover change in the eastern Amazon , 2001 .

[33]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[35]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[36]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  NUTRIENT LOSS AND REDISTRIBUTION AFTER FOREST CLEARING ON A HIGHLY WEATHERED SOIL IN AMAZONIA , 2004 .

[37]  Fergus L. Sinclair,et al.  Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  Alessandro Antonietti,et al.  A Preliminary Mixed-Method Investigation of Trust and Hidden Signals in Medical Consultations , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[40]  V. Gond,et al.  Ecosystem services of regulation and support in Amazonian pioneer fronts: searching for landscape drivers , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Clémence Guimont.  Catherine et Raphaël Larrère, PENSER ET AGIR AVEC LA NATURE, Une enquête philosophique , 2015 .

[42]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  P. Lavelle,et al.  GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality , 2007 .

[44]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[45]  Marc Pansu,et al.  Handbook of soil analysis , 2006 .

[46]  G. Tang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variations of Ecosystem Service Values in Relation to Land Use Pattern in the Loess Plateau of China at Town Scale , 2014, PloS one.

[47]  Lars Hein,et al.  Mapping Ecosystem Services for Land Use Planning, the Case of Central Kalimantan , 2014, Environmental Management.

[48]  E. Díaz-Varela,et al.  Analysis of spatial scales for ecosystem services: Application of the lacunarity concept at landscape level in Galicia (NW Spain) , 2014 .

[49]  P. Fearnside.  Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, Rates, and Consequences , 2005 .

[50]  H. Belshaw,et al.  The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations , 1947, International Organization.

[51]  C. Kull,et al.  The political ecology of ecosystem services , 2015 .

[52]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[53]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[54]  Ulrich Heink,et al.  What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning , 2010 .

[55]  S. Dufour,et al.  Mapping multiple ecosystem services indicators: Toward an objective-oriented approach , 2016 .

[56]  C. Kull,et al.  What makes ecology `political'?: rethinking `scale' in political ecology , 2009 .

[57]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[58]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Editorial: Best practices for mapping ecosystem services , 2015 .

[59]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[60]  Jan Staes,et al.  EBI: An index for delivery of ecosystem service bundles , 2014 .

[61]  Estelle Dominati,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. , 2013 .

[62]  Sean T. O'Brien.  Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems , 1998 .

[63]  Pierre-André Cornillon,et al.  Régression avec R , 2011 .

[64]  Z. Lindo,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values , 2015 .