Computational Methods to Assess the Production Potential of Bio-Based Chemicals.

Elevated costs and long implementation times of bio-based processes for producing chemicals represent a bottleneck for moving to a bio-based economy. A prospective analysis able to elucidate economically and technically feasible product targets at early research phases is mandatory. Computational tools can be implemented to explore the biological and technical spectrum of feasibility, while constraining the operational space for desired chemicals. In this chapter, two different computational tools for assessing potential for bio-based production of chemicals from different perspectives are described in detail. The first tool is GEM-Path: an algorithm to compute all structurally possible pathways from one target molecule to the host metabolome. The second tool is a framework for Modeling Sustainable Industrial Chemicals production (MuSIC), which integrates modeling approaches for cellular metabolism, bioreactor design, upstream/downstream processes, and economic impact assessment. Integrating GEM-Path and MuSIC will play a vital role in supporting early phases of research efforts and guide the policy makers with decisions, as we progress toward planning a sustainable chemical industry.

[1]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Multi-scale exploration of the technical, economic, and environmental dimensions of bio-based chemical production. , 2015, Metabolic engineering.

[3]  Peter Pollak,et al.  Fine Chemicals: The Industry and the Business , 2007 .

[4]  Sumesh Sukumara,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-disciplinary approach for assessing the technological, economic and environmental performance of bio-based chemicals. , 2015, Biochemical Society transactions.

[5]  Philip Miller,et al.  BiGG Models: A platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Fangping Mu,et al.  Prediction of metabolic reactions based on atomic and molecular properties of small-molecule compounds , 2011, Bioinform..

[8]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Advancing metabolic engineering through systems biology of industrial microorganisms. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  V. Hatzimanikatis,et al.  Design of computational retrobiosynthesis tools for the design of de novo synthetic pathways. , 2015, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[10]  Pablo Carbonell,et al.  A retrosynthetic biology approach to metabolic pathway design for therapeutic production , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[11]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Economic and environmental impacts of microbial biodiesel , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Sunwon Park,et al.  Prediction of novel synthetic pathways for the production of desired chemicals , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[13]  B Smart,et al.  Industry as a metabolic activity. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  V. Hatzimanikatis,et al.  Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[15]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Chris Morley,et al.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox , 2011, J. Cheminformatics.

[17]  Naryttza N. Diaz,et al.  The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Zachary A. King,et al.  Constraint-based models predict metabolic and associated cellular functions , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  W. R. Cluett,et al.  Dynamic strain scanning optimization: an efficient strain design strategy for balanced yield, titer, and productivity. DySScO strategy for strain design , 2013, BMC Biotechnology.

[20]  Kathleen A. Curran,et al.  Expanding the chemical palate of cells by combining systems biology and metabolic engineering. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.

[21]  Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita,et al.  From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  A. Burgard,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1,4-butanediol. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[23]  V. Hatzimanikatis,et al.  Discovery and analysis of novel metabolic pathways for the biosynthesis of industrial chemicals: 3‐hydroxypropanoate , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Generation of an atlas for commodity chemical production in Escherichia coli and a novel pathway prediction algorithm, GEM-Path. , 2014, Metabolic engineering.

[25]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Multi‐scale modeling for sustainable chemical production , 2013, Biotechnology journal.

[26]  Daniel Machado,et al.  Co-evolution of strain design methods based on flux balance and elementary mode analysis , 2015, Metabolic engineering communications.

[27]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Basic and applied uses of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions of Escherichia coli , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[28]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An Open-Source Java Library for Chemo-and Bioinformatics , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[29]  B. G. Hermann,et al.  Today’s and tomorrow’s bio-based bulk chemicals from white biotechnology , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.