Minimally invasive ureterolysis and intraperitonealization of ureter for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis; single center analysis of an erratic disease

INTRODUCTION Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is a known cause of obstructive uropathy. Ureterolysis is done when medical management fails or the presentation is at an advanced stage. Conventionally ureterolysis without omental wrap has been considered incomplete. Our Institute has experience of laparoscopic or robotic ureterolysis with intraperitonealization of the ureter alone and no other adjunctive procedure. This study retrospectively assesses the result of the procedure with patients presenting with varying severity of disease. METHODS From 2008, all patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic ureterolysis were analyzed retrospectively for pre-operative management, operative findings, and post operative outcomes. RESULTS We operated and released nine renal units in seven patients. Two of the nine cases were performed robotically completely and the rest was performed by laparoscopic approach. Median follow up was 60 months. All patients documented resolution of symptoms. The mean post-operative creatinine at 1 year was significantly decreased to 1.47 ± 0.49 mg/dl in comparison to preoperative creatinine (p < 0.05). The postoperative mean ESR decreased significantly from a preoperative value of 58.2 ± 19.41 mm to 15.8 ± 17.23. The nuclear scan revealed unobstructed drainage and radiological imaging revealed resolution of hydronephrosis and fibrosis in all. The mean GFR on the nuclear scan after 3 and 12 months of surgery was 36.3 ± 4.33 and 40 ± 3.77, respectively. Thus, there was significant increase noted in GFR at 3 and 12 months in comparison to preoperative GFR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic/robotic ureterolysis with intraperitonealization alone is secure and durable procedure for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis needing surgical release.

[1]  A. Mestiri,et al.  Role of ureterolysis in the management of retroperitoneal fibrosis: A systematic review , 2021 .

[2]  T. O'brien,et al.  Contemporary role of ureterolysis in retroperitoneal fibrosis: treatment of last resort or first intent? An analysis of 50 cases , 2017, BJU international.

[3]  Blanca Paño Brufau,et al.  Retroperitoneal fibrosis: role of imaging in diagnosis and follow-up. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  T. Hendriksz,et al.  Value of acute-phase reactants in monitoring disease activity and treatment response in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. , 2012, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[5]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Robotic ureterolysis for relief of ureteral obstruction from retroperitoneal fibrosis. , 2011, Urology.

[6]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective review of clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. , 2011, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[7]  J. Wolf,et al.  University of Michigan surgical experience with ureterolysis for retroperitoneal fibrosis: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. , 2010, Urology.

[8]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Laparoscopic ureterolysis and omental wrapping. , 2008, Urology.

[9]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Robot-assisted ureterolysis, retroperitoneal biopsy, and omental wrap: pilot series for the treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[10]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic with open approach for ureterolysis in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[11]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Minimally invasive management of retroperitoneal fibrosis. , 2008, Urology.

[12]  S. Ferretti,et al.  Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis. , 2007, Kidney international.

[13]  S. Monev Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: prompt diagnosis preserves organ function. , 2002, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.