From Climate-change Spaghetti to Climate-change Distributions for 21st-Century California

The uncertainties associated with climate-change projections for California are unlikely to disappear any time soon, and yet important long-term decisions will be needed to accommodate those potential changes. Projection uncertainties have typically been addressed by analysis of a few scenarios, chosen based on availability or to capture the extreme cases among available projections. However, by focusing on more common projections rather than the most extreme projections (using a new resampling method), new insights into current projections emerge: (1) uncertainties associated with future greenhouse-gas emissions are comparable with the differences among climate models, so that neither source of uncertainties should be neglected or underrepresented; (2) twenty-first century temperature projections spread more, overall, than do precipitation scenarios; (3) projections of extremely wet futures for California are true outliers among current projections; and (4) current projections that are warmest tend, overall, to yield a moderately drier California, while the cooler projections yield a somewhat wetter future. The resampling approach applied in this paper also provides a natural opportunity to objectively incorporate measures of model skill and the likelihoods of various emission scenarios into future assessments.

[1]  M. Collins,et al.  Projections of future climate change , 2002 .

[2]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  CLOUDS AND CLIMATE: A PROBLEM THAT REFUSES TO DIE. Clouds of many , 2022 .

[3]  S. Schneider,et al.  Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. M. Kishtawal,et al.  Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts for Weather and Seasonal Climate , 2000 .

[5]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Simulated Hydrologic Responses to Climate Variations and Change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099 , 2001 .

[6]  B. Weare,et al.  Examples of Extended Empirical Orthogonal Function Analyses , 1982 .

[7]  Richard N. Palmer,et al.  Potential Implications of PCM Climate Change Scenarios for Sacramento–San Joaquin River Basin Hydrology and Water Resources , 2004 .

[8]  David S. Richardson,et al.  Measures of skill and value of ensemble prediction systems, their interrelationship and the effect of ensemble size , 2001 .

[9]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Climates of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model , 2001 .

[10]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[11]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  A Component-Resampling Approach for Estimating Probability Distributions from Small Forecast Ensembles , 2006 .

[12]  M. Dettinger,et al.  Changes in Snowmelt Runoff Timing in Western North America under a `Business as Usual' Climate Change Scenario , 2004 .

[13]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Potential Effects of Climate Change on Streamflow, Eastern and Western Slopes of the Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada , 1996 .

[14]  Warren M. Washington,et al.  The Effects of Climate Change on Water Resources in the West: Introduction and Overview , 2004 .

[15]  Frank N Wilner.  POSSIBLE TO PROBABLE , 1999 .

[16]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[17]  Norman L. Miller,et al.  POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON CALIFORNIA HYDROLOGY 1 , 2003 .

[18]  Joel B. Smith,et al.  Climate Change Scenarios , 2006 .

[19]  David S. Richardson,et al.  ON THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF ENSEMBLE BASED WEATHER FORECASTS , 2001 .