Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs

In 2011, a research team led by the University of North Texas, the Educopia Institute/MetaArchive Cooperative, and the worldwide Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), began studying the production, dissemination, and preservation of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). The original intent was to develop and disseminate documentation for academic libraries that would help curators better understand and address the preservation challenges presented by these new digital collections. As researchers from the libraries of University of North Texas, Virginia Tech, Rice University, Boston College, Indiana State University, Penn State, and the University of Arizona began to grapple with ETD lifecycle management issues, they quickly realized that librarians were but one of many academic stakeholder groups that work collaboratively to produce and maintain ETD collections. Studying the library role in isolation was neither feasible nor helpful. The scope of our work increased to encompass the roles and responsibilities of core stakeholders in the ETD lifecycle: students, faculty, administrators, technologists, commercial vendors, and librarians. The resulting Guidance Documents address areas of interest to ETD program planners, managers, and curators. They will help this extended set of stakeholders understand, document, and address the administrative, legal, and technical challenges presented by ETDs—from submission to long-term preservation. The authors have aimed to be comprehensive in their treatment of ETD programs, and encourage readers to review all of the Guidance Document to gain a holistic view. However, they have also highlighted the sections of each document relevant to 4 roles in ETD programs: institutional administrators, submission staff, access and repository staff, and IT staff.

[1]  Mary Piorun,et al.  Digitizing dissertations for an institutional repository: a process and cost analysis. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[2]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  A research agenda for data curation cyberinfrastructure , 2011, JCDL '11.

[3]  Elaine Peterson,et al.  Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy , 2006 .

[4]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (「ディジタル図書館」ワークショップ第15回(奈良先端科学技術大学院大学.1999年7月19日)) , 1999 .

[5]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Usage patterns of an electronic theses and dissertations system , 2001, Online Inf. Rev..

[6]  Brian Lavoie Preservation Metadata: Challenge, Collaboration, and Consensus , 2004 .

[7]  Brian E. Surratt ETD Release Policies in American ARL Institutions: A Preliminary Study , 2005 .

[8]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Josh Brown Literature review of research into attitudes towards electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) , 2010 .

[10]  Cristina García Testal,et al.  Digital object identifier , 2001 .

[11]  Daniel Gelaw Alemneh Maintaining Quality Metadata: Toward Effective Digital Resource Lifecycle Management , 2008 .

[12]  Nigel Stanger,et al.  Keeping research data safe , 2009 .

[13]  Susan Copeland,et al.  Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Promoting ‘Hidden’ Research , 2008 .

[14]  Donald B. Cleveland,et al.  Introduction to indexing and abstracting (2. ed.) , 1990 .

[15]  Peter Suber Open Access to Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2008 .

[16]  Aimee Fifarek The Birth of Catalog 2.0: Innovative Interfaces’ Encore Discovery Platform , 2007 .

[17]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  The Guide for Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2001 .

[18]  Susanne M. Humphrey A knowledge-based expert system for computer-assisted indexing , 1989, IEEE Expert.

[19]  Meredith Wisner,et al.  Measuring Value in Open Access Repositories , 2011 .

[20]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  Planning and evaluating library networked services and resources , 2004 .

[21]  Virginia A. Lingle,et al.  Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[22]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Cost-driven design for archival repositories , 2001, JCDL '01.

[23]  Stephen Chapman Counting the Costs of Digital Preservation: Is Repository Storage Affordable? , 2003, J. Digit. Inf..

[24]  M. Moyle,et al.  Electronic doctoral theses in the UK: a sector-wide survey into policies, practice and barriers to Open Access , 2012 .

[25]  A Nancy,et al.  Council of Graduate Schools , 1993 .

[26]  Yong Ho Kim,et al.  An Evaluation Model for the National Consortium of Institutional Repositories of Korean Universities , 2007, ASIST.

[27]  Daniel Gelaw Alemneh,et al.  Exploration of adoption of preservation metadata in cultural heritage institutions: Case of PREMIS , 2010, ASIST.

[28]  Sarah Higgins The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model , 2008, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[29]  Carol Peters,et al.  Evaluation of digital libraries , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[30]  Ilse Assmann International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (IASA) , 2010 .

[31]  Diane I. Hillmann,et al.  The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting , 2004 .

[32]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations: A Scalable and Sustainable Approach to Unlock University Resources , 1996, D Lib Mag..

[33]  Margaret Beecher Maurer,et al.  Uniqueness Matters: LCSH and Keywords in the Library Catalog's ETD Records. , 2012 .

[34]  Angela M. McCutcheon,et al.  Impact of publishers' policy on Electronic Thesis and Dissertation (ETD) distribution options within the United States , 2010 .

[35]  Neil Beagrie,et al.  Benefits from Research Data Management in Universities for Industry and Not-for-Profit Research Partners , 2012 .

[36]  Tony Hendley Comparison of Methods & Costs of Digital Preservation , 1998 .

[37]  Lisa Gregory,et al.  The "M" Word: Exploring File Format Migration with Open Source Tools , 2011 .

[38]  Michael Day,et al.  The long-term preservation of Web content , 2006 .

[39]  Stephen Abrams,et al.  "What? So What": The Next-Generation JHOVE2 Architecture for Format-Aware Characterization , 2008, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[40]  Wang Jun Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting , 2005 .

[41]  Louise F. Spiteri,et al.  The structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalog , 2007 .

[42]  James Cheney,et al.  The W3C PROV family of specifications for modelling provenance metadata , 2013, EDBT '13.

[43]  John MacColl Electronic theses and dissertations: a strategy for the UK , 2002 .

[44]  S. Lawrence Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.

[45]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  ETDs and Graduate Education: Programs and Prospects , 2010 .

[46]  N Beagrie,et al.  Preservation Management of Digital Materials: A Handbook , 2001 .

[47]  Keishi Tajima,et al.  Archiving scientific data , 2002, SIGMOD '02.

[48]  Jennifer Trant,et al.  Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework , 2009, J. Digit. Inf..

[49]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities , 2001 .

[50]  Victor Lavrenko,et al.  Predicting social-tags for cold start book recommendations , 2009, RecSys '09.

[51]  Serge J. Goldstein,et al.  DataSpace: A Funding and Operational Model for Long-Term Preservation and Sharing of Research Data , 2010 .

[52]  Paul Ayris,et al.  How much does it cost? The LIFE Project - Costing Models for Digital Curation and Preservation , 2007 .

[53]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm , 2009, Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm.

[54]  Robert E. Dugan Information technology budgets and costs: Do you know what your information technology costs each year?☆ , 2002 .

[55]  J. K. Vijayakumar Importance of doctoral theses and its access: a literature analysis , 2007 .

[56]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology, Part I: Achieving Interoperability at the Schema Level , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[57]  Sevim McCutcheon,et al.  Basic, Fuller, Fullest: Treatment Options for Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2011 .

[58]  Ning Zhang,et al.  A tag recommendation system for folksonomy , 2009, CIKM-SWSM.

[59]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology, Part II: Achieving Interoperability at the Record and Repository Levels , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[60]  Judy Jeng,et al.  Usability Assessment of Academic Digital Libraries: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Learnability , 2005 .

[61]  D. Ridley,et al.  Cape Town, South Africa , 1986, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[62]  Lizabeth Barclay,et al.  Tagging: People-Powered Metadata for the Social Web (Smith, G.; 2008) [Book Review] , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[63]  Mark Edward Phillips,et al.  Assessing the Usage of Electronic Theses and Dissertations: An Overview of ETD Statistics and Metrics in the UNT Libraries , 2011 .

[64]  Michael B. Spring,et al.  Finding subject terms for classificatory metadata from user-generated social tags , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[65]  William R. Kehoe,et al.  Towards Interoperable Preservation Repositories (TIPR) , 2010, US-DPIF '10.

[66]  Paul Betty Assessing Homegrown Library Collections: Using Google Analytics to Track Use of Screencasts and Flash-Based Learning Objects , 2009 .

[67]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Representing and sharing folksonomies with semantics , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[68]  Lidija Ivanović,et al.  Integration of a research management system and an OAI-PMH compatible ETDs repository at the University of Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia , 2012 .

[69]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[70]  Mark Edward Phillips Metadata Analysis at the Command-Line , 2013 .

[71]  Marieke Guy,et al.  Improving the quality of metadata in eprint archives , 2004 .

[72]  Kevin Ashley Digital Archive Costs: Facts and Fallacies , 1999 .

[73]  Richard Jones,et al.  Open access, open source and e-theses: the development of the Edinburgh Research Archive , 2005, Program.

[74]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .

[75]  Elena Giglia The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends , 2010, ELPUB.

[76]  Rebecca S. Guenther,et al.  Practical Preservation: The PREMIS Experience , 2005, Libr. Trends.

[77]  Nancy H. Seamans Electronic Theses and Dissertations as Prior Publications: What the Editors Say , 2003 .

[78]  鄭宇庭 行銷硏究 : Marketing research , 2009 .

[79]  Antonia Does 4. Case studies , 2013 .

[80]  Jordan J. Ballor The dynamics of primary source and electronic resource: The digital renaissance and the post‐reformation digital library , 2012 .

[81]  Multimedia Url,et al.  Cost Model for Digital Curation: Cost of Digital Migration , 2009 .

[82]  Gernot U. Gabel Harvard University Libraries , 2008 .

[83]  Sarah Higgins,et al.  The dcc curation lifecycle model , 2008, JCDL '08.

[84]  Onyebuchi A Arah,et al.  Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2004 .

[85]  Angela Conyers,et al.  Electronic Resource Measurement: Linking Research to Practice , 2007, The Library Quarterly.

[86]  Daniel Gelaw Alemneh,et al.  Empowering digital libraries users through combining taxonomies with folksonomies , 2012, ASIST.

[87]  Christine Jewell,et al.  University of Waterloo electronic theses: issues and partnerships , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[88]  IoannidisYannis,et al.  Fourth workshop on very large digital libraries , 2012 .

[89]  D. Aaker,et al.  Chapter 2 – Marketing research , 2004 .

[90]  Michael W. Carroll Why Full Open Access Matters , 2011, PLoS biology.

[91]  Haya Asner,et al.  Electronic Theses at Ben- Gurion University: Israel as Part of the Worldwide ETD Movement , 2008 .

[92]  Miles A. Kimball,et al.  Mandatory Open Access Publishing for Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Ethics and Enthusiasm. , 2013 .

[93]  Brian Clifton,et al.  Advanced Web Metrics with Google Analytics , 2008 .

[94]  Alexis Wichowski Survival of the Fittest Tag: Folksonomies, Findability, and the Evolution of Information Organization , 2009, First Monday.

[95]  Jamal Mattar Yousuf Al Salmi Factors Influencing the Adoption and Development of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Programs, with Particular Reference to the Arab Gulf States , 2008 .

[96]  Max Chevalier,et al.  Information Retrieval and Folksonomies together for Recommender Systems , 2011, EC-Web.

[97]  Rush Miller,et al.  E-METRICS: MEASURES FOR ELECTRONIC RESOURCES , 2002 .

[98]  D. Rubinfeld Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-term Access to Digital Information , 2010 .

[99]  Margaret Beecher Maurer,et al.  Uniqueness Matters: Author-Supplied Keywords and LCSH in the Library Catalog , 2012 .

[100]  Sarah Currier,et al.  Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: An Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[101]  Program on Information Justice Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries , 2012 .

[102]  K. Antelman Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[103]  Shelby Sanett Toward Developing a Framework of Cost Elements for Preserving Authentic Electronic Records into Perpetuity , 2002 .

[104]  Mark Perry,et al.  Legal Protocols and Practices for Managing Copyright in Electronic Theses , 2006 .

[105]  Yuji Tosaka,et al.  Metadata Creation Practices in Digital Repositories and Collections: Schemata, Selection Criteria, and Interoperability , 2010 .

[106]  Michael Gorman,et al.  Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century , 2011 .

[107]  Diane Hillmann,et al.  Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination , 2004, Dublin Core Conference.

[108]  Susan Copeland,et al.  The development and promotion of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) within the UK , 2004 .

[109]  Wei Fang,et al.  Using Google Analytics for Improving Library Website Content and Design: A Case Study , 2007 .

[110]  David Mathews,et al.  Minimum Digitization Capture Recommendations , 2013 .

[111]  Daniel Yule,et al.  Jarrow, Electronic Thesis, and Dissertation Software , 2012 .

[112]  Anne Marie Taber,et al.  Evolving in Collaboration: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Workflows in North Carolina , 2010 .

[113]  Yi Jin,et al.  The development of the China Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations , 2004, Online Inf. Rev..

[114]  Robert Bruce,et al.  Descriptor and Folksonomy Concurrence in Education Related Scholarly Research , 2008, Webology.

[115]  Paul Ayris,et al.  The LIFE2 final project report , 2008 .

[116]  Martha Kyrillidou,et al.  2 – From usage to user: library metrics and expectations for the evaluation of digital libraries , 2009 .

[117]  Allen Kent,et al.  Use of a University Library Collection; A Progress Report on a Pittsburgh Study. , 1977 .

[118]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[119]  Daniel Gelaw Alemneh,et al.  Theses and Dissertations from Print to ETD: The Nuances of Preserving and Accessing Those in Music , 2014 .

[120]  Henk J. Voorbij Title keywords and subject descriptors: a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences , 1998, J. Documentation.

[121]  Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri,et al.  Assessing the Return on Investments in GL for Institutional Repositories , 2010 .

[122]  Xiaohua Hu,et al.  User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[123]  Karen Coyle,et al.  Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging Rules for the 20th Century , 2007 .

[124]  David Lowe,et al.  Digital Project Staff Survey of JPEG 2000 Implementation in Libraries , 2009 .

[125]  Michael Day,et al.  Preservation metadata initiatives: practicality, sustainability, and interoperability , 2004 .

[126]  Amy Friedlander,et al.  D-Lib Magazine: Publishing as the Honest Broker , 1998 .

[127]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Extracting, Transforming and Archiving Scientific Data , 2011, ArXiv.

[128]  Lois Mai Chan,et al.  Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings: an exploratory study , 2009, J. Documentation.

[129]  S. Harnad,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals , 2004 .

[130]  Gwenda Thomas EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY, OR POSITIONING INNOVATION BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE , 2007 .

[131]  Yale Fineman Electronic Theses and Dissertations in Music , 2004 .

[132]  Jung-ran Park Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art , 2009 .

[133]  David Giaretta,et al.  Curating Scientific Research Data for the Long Term: A Preservation Analysis Method in Context , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[134]  Martha Kyrillidou,et al.  Evaluating Usage and Impact of Networked Electronic Resources through Point-of-Use Surveys: A MINES for Libraries™ Study , 2010 .

[135]  Susan Hamburger,et al.  Preservation Management of Digital Materials: A Handbook , 2003 .

[136]  Daniel Tunkelang,et al.  Faceted Search , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.

[137]  Georgia K. Harper Copyright Crash Course , 1995 .

[138]  Elisabeth Buffard,et al.  VLC Media Player , 2012 .

[139]  Dillip K. Swain,et al.  Global Adoption of Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2010 .

[140]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[141]  Thomas H. Teper,et al.  Long-term Retention of Electronic Theses and Dissertations , 2002 .

[142]  Rebecca D. Petersen Merton, Robert K. , 2014 .

[143]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Tools and techniques , 2012 .

[144]  Martin Halbert,et al.  Avoiding the Calf-Path: Digital Preservation Readiness for Growing Collections and Distributed Preservation Networks , 2009 .

[145]  Robert Buckley,et al.  JPEG 2000 - a Practical Digital Preservation Standard? , 2008 .

[146]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  The networked digital library of theses and dissertations: Changes in the university community , 2002, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[147]  Richard Fyffe,et al.  ETDs, Scholarly Communication, and Campus Collaboration , 2008 .

[148]  Anastasia Korovina California digital library , 2014 .

[149]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[150]  Cathleen L. Martyniak Scanning Our Scholarship: The University of Florida Retrospective Dissertation Scanning Project , 2008 .

[151]  Beatriz Plaza Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics: An experiment with time series , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[152]  Colin Macduff,et al.  An evaluation of the process and initial impact of disseminating a nursing e-thesis. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[153]  T. Saracevic Relevance: A Review of the Literature and a Framework for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Part II , 2006 .

[154]  Baden Hughes Metadata Quality Evaluation: Experience from the Open Language Archives Community , 2004, ICADL.

[155]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Managing and evaluating digital repositories , 2008, Inf. Res..

[156]  Gail McMillan,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF ETDS AS PRIOR PUBLICATIONS Findings from the 2011 NDLTD Publishers' Survey , 2011 .

[157]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  The Focused Interview , 1946, American Journal of Sociology.

[158]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Indexing and Access for Digital Libraries and the Internet: Human, Database, and Domain Factors , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[159]  Howard Besser The Next Stage: Moving from Isolated Digital Collections to Interoperable Digital Libraries , 2002, First Monday.

[160]  Theo Andrew,et al.  Case study: The Edinburgh Research Archive , 2006 .

[161]  Marie Meteer,et al.  Search Engine Optimization , 2015, Future Internet.