Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Inevitable Step Toward Sustainability

Abstract Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is a platform for the systematic study of buildings once occupied, so that lessons may be learned that will improve their current conditions and guide the design of future buildings. Various aspects of the occupied buildings’ functioning and performance can be assessed in a POE, both chemo-physical (indoor environment quality (IEQ), indoor air quality (IAQ) and thermal performance) as well as more subjective and interactional (space use, user satisfaction, etc.). POE draws on an extensive quantitative and qualitative toolkit: measurements and monitoring, on the one hand, and methods such as walk-throughs, observations and user satisfaction questionnaires on the other. POE may seem a necessary, indeed, axiomatic phase of the design and construction process, and exactly the kind of integrated assessment essential for the design of more sustainable buildings. Yet POE researchers have often been regarded with suspicion and even hostility, since their work may cause friction between different stakeholders. This chapter reviews material published in recent years in an attempt to trace the emergence of POE, describe its conceptual and methodological backdrop, its interaction with other issues related to sustainable design, and its increasing ‘canonization’ as a method. We argue that POE offers the potential to integrate a range of fragmented aspects of the construction process and of the relations of buildings to their environment and users. We propose that the acceptance of POE as a mandatory step in the design and commissioning of buildings, whose results are habitually fed backward and forward to other stages of the design and construction processes, is an important and probably inevitable step toward making buildings more sustainable.

[1]  Yair Etzion A Bio-Climatic Approach to Desert Architecture , 1999 .

[2]  Lusi Morhayim,et al.  Survey of an office and laboratory university building - An unhealthy building case study , 2008 .

[3]  Lusi Morhayim,et al.  Towards a comprehensive methodology for Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE): A hot dry climate case study , 2007 .

[4]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better , 1995 .

[5]  Suzanne Ewing,et al.  The Oxford Conference 2008: A re-evaluation of Education in Architecture , 2008 .

[6]  P Perica Savanovic,et al.  Design decision support for the conceptual phase of sustainable building design , 2008 .

[7]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  On the microclimatic behavior of two semi-enclosed attached courtyards in a hot dry region , 1995 .

[8]  Susan Roaf,et al.  Adapting Buildings and Cities for Climate Change: A 21st Century Survival Guide , 2005 .

[9]  Chris Watson,et al.  Review of Building Quality Using Post Occupancy Evaluation , 2003 .

[10]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Windows in the workplace: examining issues of environmental sustainability and occupant comfort in the selection of multi-glazed windows , 2005 .

[11]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[12]  Sebastian Herkel,et al.  Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria , 2007 .

[13]  A sense of place: what residents think of their new homes , 2007 .

[14]  H Levin INTEGRATING INDOOR AIR AND DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABILITY , 2005 .

[15]  David Lehrer,et al.  Listening to the occupants: a Web-based indoor environmental quality survey. , 2004, Indoor air.

[16]  I. G. Capeluto,et al.  Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates , 2006 .

[17]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  Thermal sensation and comfort with different task conditioning systems , 2007 .

[18]  Rogério Duarte,et al.  Monitoring of a Double Skin Façade Building: Methodology and Office Thermal and Energy Performance , 2006 .

[19]  Lusi Morhayim,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation of a Scientists Village Complex in the Desert - Towards a Comprehensive Methodology , 2006 .

[20]  P Wargocki,et al.  Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. , 1999, Indoor air.

[21]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Assessing building performance , 2005 .

[22]  Yu Song,et al.  Perceived conditions of workers in different organizational settings , 2008 .

[23]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[24]  Barbara C. Lippiatt BEES (Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability): Balancing Environmental and Economic Performance. , 1998 .

[25]  Leah Zagreus,et al.  Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings , 2006 .

[26]  Isaac A. Meir Monitoring two kibbutz houses in the Negev desert , 1990 .

[27]  Boris A. Portnov,et al.  An open GIS framework for recording and analysing post-occupancy changes in residential buildings — a climate-related case study , 2001 .

[28]  F. Mallick Thermal comfort and building design in the tropical climates , 1996 .

[29]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Refining the use of evaporation in an experimental down-draft cool tower , 1996 .

[30]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Review on visual comfort in office buildings and influence of daylight in productivity , 2008 .

[31]  P. M. Bluyssen,et al.  Relations between perceived indoor environment characteristics and well-being of occupants at individual level , 2006 .

[32]  Susan McMullen Libraries in transition: evolving the information ecology of the Learning Commons: a sabbatical report , 2007 .

[33]  Risto Kosonen,et al.  Perceived IEQ Conditions: Why the Actual Percentage of Dissatisfied Persons is Higher than Standards Indicate? , 2011 .

[34]  David Pearson The Natural House Book , 1989 .

[35]  David Pearlmutter,et al.  A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert , 2008 .

[36]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings , 2007 .

[37]  M. Atif,et al.  Energy performance of daylight-linked automatic lighting control systems in large atrium spaces: report on two field-monitored case studies , 2003 .

[38]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Indoor Air Quality Handbook , 2000 .

[39]  Susan Roaf,et al.  Closing the Loop: Benchmarks for Sustainable Buildings , 2003 .

[40]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  169: Observation-based models of user control actions in buildings , 2008 .

[41]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Modeling relative influence of environmental and socio- cultural factors on context-specific functions , 2006 .

[42]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  Field measurement on visual environment in office building daylit from light well in japan , 2006 .

[43]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Sustainable schools better than traditional schools , 2008 .

[44]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Assessing the climatic implications of lightweight housing in a peripheral arid region , 1995 .

[45]  Post-Occupancy – Squaring the Circle : A Case Study on Innovative Social Housing in Aberdeenshire , Scotland , 2004 .

[46]  Claude-Alain Roulet,et al.  Creating healthy and energy-efficient buildings: lessons learned from the Hope project , 2005 .

[47]  Isaac A. Meir,et al.  Lightweight Housing in Arid Zones: Thermal Comfort and Energy Use , 1998 .