Executive Succession and Organization Outcomes in Turbulent Environments: An Organization Learning Approach

This paper explores executive succession as an important mechanism for organization learning and, thus, for organization adaptation. We argue that executive succession can fundamentally alter the knowledge, skills and interaction processes of the senior management team. These revised skills and communication processes improve the team's ability to recognize and act on changing environmental conditions. Especially in turbulent environments, succession may be critical for improving or sustaining the performance of the firm. We explore continuity and change of CEOs and their executive teams as associated with first-and second-order organization learning, which are differentially important under stable versus turbulent environmental conditions. We also link these organization learning ideas to the nature of organization evolution. A series of hypotheses link executive-team succession and strategic reorientation to subsequent organization performance. Results in a study of 59 minicomputer firms, all founded between 1968 and 1971, indicate that succession exerts a positive influence on organization performance. We also show that it is important to distinguish between CEO succession and executive-team change, which independently improve subsequent organization performance. The positive impact of succession is accentuated when it coincides with strategic reorientation. Finally we examined how longer term patterns in succession and reorientation affect organization performance. We discovered two modes of organization adaption in this turbulent industry. The most typical mode combines CEO succession, sweeping executive-team changes, and strategic reorientations. A more rare, and over the long-term more effective, adaptational mode involves strategic reorientation and executive-team change, but no succession of the CEO. Consistently high-performing organizations are managed to sustain a relatively high level of learning through turnover of senior executives and strategic reorientation, and at the same time to maintain links with established organizational competencies through retention of the CEO.

[1]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organization Context and Executive Team Characteristics , 1993 .

[2]  S. Mezias,et al.  An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1992 .

[3]  James G. March,et al.  Learning from samples of one or fewer* , 1991 .

[4]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking , 1991 .

[5]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[6]  D. Farmer Strategies for Change. , 1990 .

[7]  Stewart D. Friedman,et al.  CEO SUCCESSION AND STOCKHOLDER REACTION: THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT AND EVENT CONTENT , 1989 .

[8]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[9]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[10]  Warren Boeker,et al.  The Development and Institutionalization of Subunit Power in Organizations. , 1989 .

[11]  Larry E. Greiner,et al.  New CEO intervention and dynamics of deliberate strategic change , 1989 .

[12]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[13]  J. Dutton,et al.  Discerning threats and opportunities. , 1988 .

[14]  James W. Fairfield-Sonn,et al.  The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. , 1987 .

[15]  David Miller,et al.  Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms , 1986 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  Inertia, Environments and Strategic Choice: Quasi-Experimental Designs for Comparative Research , 1986 .

[18]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Inertia, environments and strategic choice: a quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research , 1986 .

[19]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Administrative Succession and Organizational Performance: How Administrator Experience Mediates the Succession Effect , 1986 .

[20]  P. Grinyer Book reviewThe awakening giant: Continuity and change at ICI : Andrew W. Pettigrew, Basil Blackwell (1985), 519 pp. £25.00 (hardback) , 1986 .

[21]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. , 1985 .

[22]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[23]  J. Bartunek Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[24]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[25]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[26]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[27]  P. Nystrom,et al.  To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn , 1984 .

[28]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Dynamics of Publisher Succession in Newspaper Organizations , 1984 .

[29]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[30]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Justification of Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[31]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports , 1983 .

[32]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managerial Response to Changing Environments: Perspectives on Problem Sensing from Social Cognition. , 1982 .

[33]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Tracking Strategy in an Entrepreneurial Firm1 , 1982 .

[34]  K. Cameron,et al.  Coffin nails and corporate strategies , 1982 .

[35]  A. Meyer Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[36]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[37]  J. Pfeffer Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[38]  J. McCann Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[39]  R. Neustadt,et al.  Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter , 1980 .

[40]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[41]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[42]  James G. March,et al.  Almost Random Careers: The Wisconsin School Superintendency, 1940-1972. , 1977 .

[43]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening Post. , 1976 .

[44]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[45]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[46]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Executive Recruitment and the Development of Interfirm Organizations , 1973 .

[47]  Warren B. Brown,et al.  Successor Type and Organizational Change in the Corporate Enterprise. , 1972 .

[48]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[49]  B. Barber,et al.  Men, Machines, and Modern Times. , 1967 .

[50]  O. Grusky,et al.  Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[52]  Richard O. Carlson Succession and Performance Among School Superintendents , 1961 .

[53]  Philip Selznick Leadership in administration , 1957 .

[54]  S. Messinger Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement , 1955 .

[55]  L. Tarshis The elements of economics , 1948 .