The Performance Test of Three Different Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) Blade Shapes Using Experimental and Numerical Methods

Three different horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blade geometries with the same diameter of 0.72 m using the same NACA4418 airfoil profile have been investigated both experimentally and numerically. The first is an optimum (OPT) blade shape, obtained using improved blade element momentum (BEM) theory. A detailed description of the blade geometry is also given. The second is an untapered and optimum twist (UOT) blade with the same twist distributions as the OPT blade. The third blade is untapered and untwisted (UUT). Wind tunnel experiments were used to measure the power coefficients of these blades, and the results indicate that both the OPT and UOT blades perform with the same maximum power coefficient, C p = 0.428, but it is located at different tip speed ratio, λ = 4.92 for the OPT blade and λ = 4.32 for the UOT blade. The UUT blade has a maximum power coefficient of C p = 0.210 at λ = 3.86. After the tests, numerical simulations were performed using a full three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method using the k - ω SST turbulence model. It has been found that CFD predictions reproduce the most accurate model power coefficients. The good agreement between the measured and computed power coefficients of the three models strongly suggest that accurate predictions of HAWT blade performance at full-scale conditions are also possible using the CFD method.

[1]  M. O. L. Hansena,et al.  State of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity - DTU Orbit (30/10/2017) , 2007 .

[2]  M. Drela.  XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 1989 .

[3]  D. Mavriplis,et al.  Unstructured Mesh CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of the NREL Phase VI Rotor , 2009 .

[4]  Helge Aagaard Madsen,et al.  On the Relative importance of Rotational, Unsteady and Three-Dimensional Effects on the HAWT Rotor Aerodynamics , 1990 .

[5]  Scott Schreck,et al.  The NREL full-scale wind tunnel experiment Introduction to the special issue , 2002 .

[6]  S.S. Venkata,et al.  Wind energy explained: Theory, Design, and application [Book Review] , 2003, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[7]  Scott Schreck,et al.  Detached‐eddy simulation of flow around the NREL Phase VI blade , 2002 .

[8]  Vidyadhar Y Mudkavi,et al.  CFD Analysis of 500 kW Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Blades: Straight and Bent Cases , 2009 .

[9]  H. Glauert.  The elements of aerofoil and airscrew theory , 1926 .

[10]  John K. Kaldellis,et al.  A Computational Aerodynamics Simulation of the NREL Phase II Rotor , 2009 .

[11]  Niels N. Sørensen,et al.  Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80-by-120 wind tunnel , 2002 .

[12]  Vladimir Cardos,et al.  Rotational Effects on the Boundary-Layer Flow in Wind Turbines , 2004 .

[13]  Hiroyuki Hirahara,et al.  Testing basic performance of a very small wind turbine designed for multi-purposes , 2005 .

[14]  David A. Spera,et al.  Wind turbine technology : fundamental concepts of wind turbine engineering , 1994 .

[15]  Hiroshi Taniguchi,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a horizontal axis wind turbine , 2005 .

[16]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[17]  Fei-Bin Hsiao,et al.  Aerodynamic Investigations of Low-Aspect-Ratio Thin Plate Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2012 .

[18]  C. Ostowari,et al.  Post-stall wind tunnel data for NACA 44XX series airfoil sections , 1985 .

[19]  J. C. Narramore,et al.  Navier-Stokes calculations of inboard stall delay due to rotation , 1992 .

[20]  Maureen Hand,et al.  NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel: A Comparison of Predictions to Measurements , 2001 .

[21]  Charles Meneveau,et al.  Direct mechanical torque sensor for model wind turbines , 2010 .

[22]  L. A. Viterna,et al.  Fixed pitch rotor performance of large horizontal axis wind turbines , 1982 .