The Role of Layered Scene Representations in Color Appearance

The chromatic appearance of a surface depends on its surrounding scene. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed to account for such phenomena, ranging from low-level gain control or adaptation processes that adjust for such properties as a scene's chromatic mean and covariance structure, to higher-level computations that compensate for the chromatic content of the illuminant. Despite their differences, a shared prediction of all such processes is that color induction should be limited to a full discounting of the surround or illuminant color--that is, an opponent color shift equal in magnitude to the chromatic bias of the surround or illuminant. Here, we report new forms of chromatic induction that can be significantly larger than predicted by all such models. We show that when the geometric and chromatic relationships between a target and its surround support a decomposition of an image into multiple layers, the induced color can significantly exceed the full discounting prediction. Similar phenomena are also observed with achromatic stimuli, suggesting that common processes of perceptual decomposition are involved in both forms of induction. These results demonstrate that information about the geometric and photometric relationship between a target and its surround is utilized by the mechanisms involved in color induction.

[1]  R. Shapley,et al.  Brightness contrast inhibits color induction: evidence for a new kind of color theory. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[2]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Color contrast: a contributory mechanism to color constancy. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[3]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Layered image representations and the computation of surface lightness. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  S. Shevell The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception , 1978, Vision Research.

[5]  G. Buchsbaum A spatial processor model for object colour perception , 1980 .

[6]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Illuminant color perception of spectrally filtered spotlights. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[7]  A. Valberg,et al.  “Colour constancy” in Mondrian patterns: A partial cancellation of physical chromaticity shifts by simultaneous contrast , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Image segmentation and lightness perception , 2005, Nature.

[9]  N. Newman The Visual Neurosciences , 2005 .

[10]  S. Shevell,et al.  Large shifts in color appearance from patterned chromatic backgrounds , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[12]  B. Khang,et al.  Cues and strategies for color constancy: perceptual scission, image junctions and transformational color matching , 2002, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Macleod,et al.  Color appearance depends on the variance of surround colors , 1997, Current Biology.

[14]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Chromatic induction and the layout of colours within a complex scene , 2003, Vision Research.

[15]  B. Anderson A Theory of Illusory Lightness and Transparency in Monocular and Binocular Images: The Role of Contour Junctions , 1997, Perception.

[16]  M. D'Zmura,et al.  Color Transparency , 1997, Perception.

[17]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination , 1999, Nature.

[18]  S. Anstis,et al.  Nonlinear combination of luminance excursions during flicker, simultaneous contrast, afterimages and binocular fusion , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  Jo Ann S. Kinney,et al.  Factors affecting induced color , 1962 .

[20]  V. Ekroll,et al.  The peculiar nature of simultaneous colour contrast in uniform surrounds , 2004, Vision Research.

[21]  V. Ekroll,et al.  The natural center of chromaticity space is not always achromatic: A new look at color induction , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[23]  S. Shevell,et al.  Color shifts from S-cone patterned backgrounds: contrast sensitivity and spatial frequency selectivity , 2005, Vision Research.

[24]  Rainer Mausfeld,et al.  Second-Order Statistics of Colour Codes Modulate Transformations That Effectuate Varying Degrees of Scene Invariance and Illumination Invariance , 2002, Perception.

[25]  M. Brill Perceptual Constancy: Why Things Look As They Do , 1999 .

[26]  Donald I. A. MacLeod,et al.  Influence of scene statistics on colour constancy , 2002, Nature.

[27]  D. Brainard,et al.  Mechanisms of color constancy under nearly natural viewing. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Perceptual Constancy: why things look as they do , 1998 .

[29]  J. Walraven Discounting the background—the missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction , 1976, Vision Research.