Definition and use of Solution-focused Sustainability Assessment: A novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems.

This paper introduces Solution-focused Sustainability Assessment (SfSA), provides practical guidance formatted as a versatile process framework, and illustrates its utility for solving a wicked environmental management problem. Society faces complex and increasingly wicked environmental problems for which sustainable solutions are sought. Wicked problems are multi-faceted, and deriving of a management solution requires an approach that is participative, iterative, innovative, and transparent in its definition of sustainability and translation to sustainability metrics. We suggest to add the use of a solution-focused approach. The SfSA framework is collated from elements from risk assessment, risk governance, adaptive management and sustainability assessment frameworks, expanded with the 'solution-focused' paradigm as recently proposed in the context of risk assessment. The main innovation of this approach is the broad exploration of solutions upfront in assessment projects. The case study concerns the sustainable management of slightly contaminated sediments continuously formed in ditches in rural, agricultural areas. This problem is wicked, as disposal of contaminated sediment on adjacent land is potentially hazardous to humans, ecosystems and agricultural products. Non-removal would however reduce drainage capacity followed by increased risks of flooding, while contaminated sediment removal followed by offsite treatment implies high budget costs and soil subsidence. Application of the steps in the SfSA-framework served in solving this problem. Important elements were early exploration of a wide 'solution-space', stakeholder involvement from the onset of the assessment, clear agreements on the risk and sustainability metrics of the problem and on the interpretation and decision procedures, and adaptive management. Application of the key elements of the SfSA approach eventually resulted in adoption of a novel sediment management policy. The stakeholder participation and the intensive communication throughout the project resulted in broad support for both the scientific approaches and results, as well as for policy implementation.

[1]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[2]  Joseph A. Tainter,et al.  Supply-Side Sustainability , 2003 .

[3]  Cynthia Stahl,et al.  A demonstration of the necessity and feasibility of using a clumsy decision analytic approach on wicked environmental problems , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[4]  Enver Doruk Özdemir,et al.  A confusion of tongues or the art of aggregating indicators—Reflections on four projective methodologies on sustainability measurement , 2011 .

[5]  E Ferguson,et al.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. , 2006, Environment international.

[6]  S. Linder,et al.  Integrated assessment of risk and sustainability in the context of regulatory decision making. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  A. Wintersen,et al.  Beslissen over bagger op bodem; deel 3 modellering van risico's na verspreiding bagger , 2006 .

[9]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Annemarie P van Wezel,et al.  Towards spatially smart abatement of human pharmaceuticals in surface waters: Defining impact of sewage treatment plants on susceptible functions. , 2015, Water research.

[11]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  Sustainability Jam Sessions for vision creation and problem solving , 2015 .

[12]  E. Hansen,et al.  Sustainability-Oriented Innovation of SMEs: A Systematic Review , 2014 .

[13]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1 , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2019, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.

[15]  Charles Yoe,et al.  Principles of Risk Analysis , 2011 .

[16]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[17]  Rainer Bruggemann,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analyses. Viewing MCDA in terms of both process and aggregation methods: some thoughts, motivated by the paper of Huang, Keisler and Linkov. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  John Bessant,et al.  Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review , 2016 .

[19]  P. Earley,et al.  Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments , 1990 .

[20]  A. Gasparatosa,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[21]  P. Stern,et al.  Decision making for the environment : social and behavioral science research priorities , 2005 .

[22]  Frank A. Swartjes,et al.  Risk-Based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  E. P. Evans,et al.  Land use, water management and future flood risk. , 2009 .

[24]  S. Hyman,et al.  The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. , 2010, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[25]  L Posthuma,et al.  Regional ecotoxicological hazards associated with anthropogenic enrichment of heavy metals , 2011, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[26]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[27]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A meta-framework for sustainability assessment Research Memorandum 2013-16 , 2013 .

[28]  J. Bradbury The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk , 1989 .

[29]  Peter M Chapman,et al.  Well past time to stop using NOELs and LOELs , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[30]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[31]  Bruce K. Hope A Commentary on Dr. Finkel's Proposal for Solution-Focused Risk Assessment , 2011 .

[32]  A. Wintersen,et al.  Beslissen over bagger op bodem. Deel 1. Systeembenadering, model en praktijkvoorbeelden , 2006 .

[33]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Human Interactions and Sustainability , 2012 .

[34]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities. , 2015 .

[35]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  A meta-framework for sustainability assessment , 2013 .

[36]  Ler,et al.  CSOIL 2000 an exposure model for human risk assessmentof soil contamination. A model description , 2007 .

[37]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis , 1990 .

[38]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective , 2012 .

[40]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[41]  E. McNie Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[42]  A. Wintersen,et al.  Beslissen over bagger op bodem. Deel 2. Onderbouwing stofgedragmodellering en voorspelde landbodemconcentraties na verspreiding bagger op land , 2006 .

[43]  J. Clarence Davies Comment on “Solution-Focused” Risk Assessment , 2011 .

[44]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution , 2000 .

[45]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  An Identification Key for Selecting Methods for Sustainability Assessments , 2015 .

[46]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  D. Zwart,et al.  Extrapolation Practice for Ecotoxicological Effect Characterization of Chemicals , 2008 .

[48]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Hunting Down the Chimera of Multiple Disciplinarity in Conservation Science , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  Michael Gilek,et al.  Governance of Complex Socio-Environmental Risks: The Case of Hazardous Chemicals in the Baltic Sea , 2011, AMBIO.

[50]  Joseph V. Rodricks,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Toxicology to Advance Risk Assessment , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[51]  A. Verbruggen,et al.  Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development , 2014 .

[52]  J. Harmsen,et al.  Landfarming of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and mineral oil contaminated sediments , 2004 .

[53]  H. Wilke,et al.  When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. , 1998 .

[54]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[55]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room , 1992 .

[56]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  The [R]Evolving Relationship Between Risk Assessment and Risk Management , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[57]  Bastiaan Zoeteman Sustainable Development Drivers: The Role of Leadership in Government, Business and NGO Performance , 2012 .

[58]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Predicted mixture toxic pressure relates to observed fraction of benthic macrofauna species impacted by contaminant mixtures , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[59]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[60]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies † , 2002 .

[61]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[62]  Ian Dodd,et al.  Harmonising conflicts between science, regulation, perception and environmental impact: the case of soil conditioners from bioenergy. , 2015, Environment international.

[63]  John Turnpenny,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR TOOL SELECTION AND USE IN INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[64]  A. Finkel,et al.  'Solution-Focused Risk Assessment' - A Proposal for the Fusion of Environmental Analysis and Action , 2010 .

[65]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[66]  Harry Biggs,et al.  Strategic Adaptive Management in freshwater protected areas and their rivers , 2011 .

[67]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  Comments on Dr. Finkel's Paper on Solution Focused Risk Assessment (SFRA) , 2011 .

[68]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis , 2011, AMBIO.

[69]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[70]  Pita Spruijt,et al.  Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review , 2014 .

[71]  R.P.J.J. Rietra,et al.  Verspreiden van bagger op het land in klei- en veengebieden , 2012 .

[72]  Ler,et al.  Nieuwe normen Waterbodems. Normen voor verspreiden en toepassen op bodem onder oppervlaktewater , 2008 .

[73]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[74]  Global Affairs Division Sustainability and the U.S. EPA , 2011 .

[75]  Helmut Segner,et al.  The SOLUTIONS project: challenges and responses for present and future emerging pollutants in land and water resources management. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[76]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .