Comparative study between a new nonlinear model and common linear model for analysing laboratory simulated‐forest hyperspectral data

The spectral unmixing of mixed pixels is a key factor in remote sensing images, especially for hyperspectral imagery. A commonly used approach to spectral unmixing has been linear unmixing. However, the question of whether linear or nonlinear processes dominate spectral signatures of mixed pixels is still an unresolved matter. In this study, we put forward a new nonlinear model for inferring end‐member fractions within hyperspectral scenes. This study focuses on comparing the nonlinear model with a linear model. A detail comparative analysis of the fractions ‘sunlit crown’, ‘sunlit background’ and ‘shadow’ between the two methods was carried out through visualization, and comparing with supervised classification using a database of laboratory simulated‐forest scenes. Our results show that the nonlinear model of spectral unmixing outperforms the linear model, especially in the scenes with translucent crown on a white background. A nonlinear mixture model is needed to account for the multiple scattering between tree crowns and background.

[1]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Vegetation in deserts. I - A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. II - Environmental influences on regional abundance , 1990 .

[2]  J. Boardman,et al.  Geometric mixture analysis of imaging spectrometry data , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  John B. Adams,et al.  Quantitative subpixel spectral detection of targets in multispectral images. [terrestrial and planetary surfaces] , 1992 .

[4]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  R. Jackson,et al.  Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds , 1985 .

[6]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  A semiempirical method for analysis of the reflectance spectra of binary mineral mixtures , 1983 .

[7]  Alexander F. H. Goetz,et al.  Sedimentary Facies Analysis Using AVIRIS Data: A Geophysical Inverse Problem , 1990 .

[8]  B. Hapke Theory of reflectance and emittance spectroscopy , 1993 .

[9]  J. Mustard,et al.  Abundance and distribution of ultramafic microbreccia in Moses Rock Dike: Quantitative application of AIS data , 1987 .

[10]  Karl Fred Huemmrich,et al.  Remote Sensing of Forest Biophysical Structure Using Mixture Decomposition and Geometric Reflectance Models , 1995 .

[11]  D. Roberts,et al.  Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data , 1993 .

[12]  Alexander F. H. Goetz,et al.  Terrestrial imaging spectrometry - Current status, future trends , 1993 .

[13]  Baoxin Hu,et al.  Retrieval of the canopy leaf area index in the BOREAS flux tower sites using linear spectral mixture analysis , 2004 .

[14]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[15]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Abundance and distribution of ultramafic microbreccia in Moses Rock dike - Quantitative application of mapping spectroscopy , 1987 .

[16]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces , 1994 .

[17]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Photometric phase functions of common geologic minerals and applications to quantitative analysis of mineral mixture reflectance spectra , 1989 .