Daily suspended sediment concentration simulation using hydrological data of Pranhita River Basin, India

Simulation of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) in a river is very important for planning and management of water resources. In this study, co-active neuro-fuzzy inference system (CANFIS), multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), multiple linear and non-linear regressions (MLR and MNLR), and sediment rating curve (SRC) techniques were applied for simulating the daily SSC at Tekra gauging site on Pranhita River, a major tributary of Godavari River basin, Andhra Pradesh, India. The daily data of discharge (m3/s) and SSC (g/l) from June 2000 to November 2003 were used for SSC simulation. The appropriate combination of input variables for CANFIS, MLPNN, MLR and MNLR models were decided using the gamma test (GT). The outcomes from CANFIS, MLPNN, MLR, MNLR and SRC models were compared to observed values of SSC on the basis of root mean squared error (RMSE), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of efficiency (CE). The results indicate the superiority of CANFIS model than the MLPNN, MLR, MNLR and SRC models in simulating daily SSC for the study location. The aim of this study was to analyse the comparative potential of CANFIS, MLP, MLR, MNLR and SRC models for simulation of daily SSC at Tekra site of Pranhita River, Godavari River basin, India.Combination of the input variables i.e. Qt, Qt1,St1 was identified the appropriate input combination for SSC simulation at Tekra site.The results of this study reveals that the performance of CANFIS models was superior to the MLP, MLR, MNLR and SRC models for simulating the daily SSC for Tekra site on Pranhita River.

[1]  Hossein Tabari,et al.  Comparison of artificial neural network and multivariate linear regression methods for estimation of daily soil temperature in an arid region , 2011 .

[2]  A. Tokar,et al.  Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1999 .

[3]  O. Ks Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation , 2004 .

[4]  Mahmud Güngör,et al.  Monthly total sediment forecasting using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system , 2010 .

[5]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  Daily suspended sediment concentration simulation using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[7]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Suspended sediment concentration estimation by an adaptive neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches using hydro-meteorological data , 2009 .

[9]  M. Vafakhah,et al.  Evaluating the support vector machine for suspended sediment load forecasting based on gamma test , 2016, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[10]  Ashish Pandey,et al.  Daily suspended sediment simulation using machine learning approach , 2016 .

[11]  M. Bilgili Prediction of soil temperature using regression and artificial neural network models , 2010 .

[12]  Hossein Tabari,et al.  Estimation of daily pan evaporation using artificial neural network and multivariate non-linear regression , 2010, Irrigation Science.

[13]  Hirad Abghari,et al.  Utility of coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system for pan evaporation modeling in comparison with multilayer perceptron , 2012, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[14]  Gokmen Tayfur,et al.  Artificial neural networks for estimating daily total suspended sediment in natural streams , 2006 .

[15]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  River suspended sediment modelling using a fuzzy logic approach , 2006 .

[16]  A. Arabi Yazdi,et al.  Flood flow forecasting using ANN, ANFIS and regression models , 2013, Neural Computing and Applications.

[17]  N. Asselman Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves , 2000 .

[18]  V. Jothiprakash,et al.  Reservoir Sedimentation Estimation Using Artificial Neural Network , 2009 .

[19]  Edward A. McBean,et al.  Uncertainty in Suspended Sediment Transport Curves , 1988 .

[20]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data , 2005 .

[21]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[22]  Dawei Han,et al.  Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, Gamma test, and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction , 2011 .

[23]  Ozgur Kisi Discussion of “Daily Pan Evaporation Modeling in a Hot and Dry Climate” by J. Piri, S. Amin, A. Moghaddamnia, A. Keshavarz, D. Han, and R. Remesan , 2010 .

[24]  Dawei Han,et al.  Model data selection using gamma test for daily solar radiation estimation , 2008 .

[25]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Suspended Sediment Modeling Using Neuro-Fuzzy Embedded Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Technique , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[26]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Modelling daily suspended sediment of rivers in Turkey using several data-driven techniques / Modélisation de la charge journalière en matières en suspension dans des rivières turques à l'aide de plusieurs techniques empiriques , 2008 .

[27]  Özgür Kişi,et al.  Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation / Prévision et estimation de la concentration en matières en suspension avec des perceptrons multi-couches et l’algorithme d’apprentissage de Levenberg-Marquardt , 2004 .

[28]  Kwok-Wing Chau,et al.  A comparison of various artificial intelligence approaches performance for estimating suspended sediment load of river systems: a case study in United States , 2015, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[29]  D. M. Titterington,et al.  A small selection of neural network methods and their statistical connections , 1994 .

[30]  A. Ahmadi,et al.  Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines , 2013 .

[31]  N. K. Goel,et al.  Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy inference system for modeling stage–discharge relationship , 2006 .

[32]  S. Eslamian,et al.  A Principal Component Regression Method for Estimating Low Flow Index , 2010 .

[33]  H. Tabari,et al.  Predicting Spatial Distribution of Snow Water Equivalent Using Multivariate Non-linear Regression and Computational Intelligence Methods , 2011 .

[34]  Dawei Han,et al.  Closure to "Daily Pan Evaporation Modeling in a Hot and Dry Climate" , 2009 .

[35]  Ali Aytek,et al.  Co-active neurofuzzy inference system for evapotranspiration modeling , 2009, Soft Comput..

[36]  Nenad Koncar,et al.  A note on the Gamma test , 1997, Neural Computing & Applications.

[37]  Dawei Han,et al.  Evaporation Estimation Using Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Techniques , 2009 .

[38]  Majid Heydari,et al.  Prediction of flow through rockfill dams using a neuro-fuzzy computing technique , 2011 .

[39]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Modeling River Stage‐Discharge Relationships Using Different Neural Network Computing Techniques , 2009 .

[40]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Streamflow Forecasting Using Different Artificial Neural Network Algorithms , 2007 .

[41]  Mehdi Homaee,et al.  Modeling sediment yield using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression methods , 2013 .

[42]  P. Mallikarjuna,et al.  RAINFALL—RUNOFF MODELLING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 2009 .

[43]  O. Kisi,et al.  Suspended sediment modeling using genetic programming and soft computing techniques , 2012 .

[44]  A. K. Lohani,et al.  Deriving stage–discharge–sediment concentration relationships using fuzzy logic , 2007 .

[45]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study , 1998 .

[46]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Pan Evaporation Simulation Based on Daily Meteorological Data Using Soft Computing Techniques and Multiple Linear Regression , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[47]  Rameswar Panda,et al.  Application of neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for river flow prediction , 2009 .

[48]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy And Soft Computing: A Computational Approach To Learning And Machine Intelligence [Books in Brief] , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[49]  P. C. Nayak,et al.  Fuzzy computing based rainfall–runoff model for real time flood forecasting , 2005 .

[50]  Antonia J. Jones,et al.  The Construction of Smooth Models using Irregular Embeddings Determined by a Gamma Test Analysis , 2002, Neural Computing & Applications.

[51]  Sharad K. Jain,et al.  Development of Integrated Sediment Rating Curves Using ANNs , 2001 .

[52]  Abdolmajid Muhammadi,et al.  Suspended Sediment Concentration Estimation Using Artificial Neural Networks and Neural-fuzzy Inference System Case Study: Karaj Dam , 2012 .

[53]  Jimson Mathew,et al.  Runoff prediction using an integrated hybrid modelling scheme , 2009 .

[54]  Muhammad Zeeshan,et al.  A comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Local Linear Regression (LLR) techniques for predicting monthly reservoir levels , 2015, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering.