Macromolecular Crowding and Size Effects on Probe Microviscosity

Development of biologically relevant crowding solutions necessitates improved understanding of how the relative size and density of mobile obstacles affect probe diffusion. Both the crowding density and relative size of each co-solute in a mixture will contribute to the measured microviscosity as assessed by altered translational mobility. Using multiphoton fluorescent correlation spectroscopy, this study addresses how excluded volume of dextran polymers from 10 to 500 kDa affect microviscosity quantified by measurements of calmodulin labeled with green fluorescent protein as the diffusing probe. Autocorrelation functions were fit using both a multiple-component model with maximum entropy method (MEMFCS) and an anomalous model. Anomalous diffusion was not detected, but fits of the data with the multiple-component model revealed separable modes of diffusion. When the dominant mode of diffusion from the MEMFCS analysis was used, we observed that increased excluded volume slows probe mobility as a simple exponential with crowder concentration. This behavior can be modeled with a single parameter, β, which depends on the dextran size composition. Two additional modes of diffusion were observed using MEMFCS and were interpreted as unique microviscosities. The fast mode corresponded to unhindered free diffusion as in buffer, whereas the slower agreed well with the bulk viscosity. At 10% crowder concentration, one finds a microviscosity approximately three times that of water, which mimics that reported for intracellular viscosity.

[1]  Daniel S. Banks,et al.  Anomalous diffusion of proteins due to molecular crowding. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[2]  J. Chirife,et al.  A simple model for predicting the viscosity of sugar and oligosaccharide solutions , 1997 .

[3]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Protein-protein association in polymer solutions: from dilute to semidilute to concentrated. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  J. Mertz,et al.  Molecular photodynamics involved in multi-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy , 1998 .

[5]  R. Rigler,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of triplet states in solution: a theoretical and experimental study , 1995 .

[6]  R. Bryan,et al.  Maximum entropy analysis of photon correlation spectroscopy data using a bayesian estimate for the regularization parameter , 1991 .

[7]  Petra Schwille,et al.  Photobleaching and stabilization of. fluorophores used for single-molecule analysis. with one- and two-photon excitation , 2001 .

[8]  A. Visser,et al.  Proteins as micro viscosimeters: Brownian motion revisited , 2006, European Biophysics Journal.

[9]  A S Verkman,et al.  Analysis of fluorophore diffusion by continuous distributions of diffusion coefficients: application to photobleaching measurements of multicomponent and anomalous diffusion. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Yoshihisa Kubota,et al.  Multiple diffusion mechanisms due to nanostructuring in crowded environments. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[11]  K. Berland,et al.  Observation volumes and {gamma}-factors in two-photon fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  N. Periasamy,et al.  Measuring size distribution in highly heterogeneous systems with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Vijay Iyer,et al.  Focal volume characterization using multiphoton fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (MP-FCS) , 2004, SPIE BiOS.

[14]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. , 2000, International review of cytology.

[15]  Petra Schwille,et al.  Two-photon cross-correlation analysis of intracellular reactions with variable stoichiometry. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Petra Schwille,et al.  Intracellular calmodulin availability accessed with two-photon cross-correlation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Skilling,et al.  Maximum entropy image reconstruction: general algorithm , 1984 .

[18]  Bengt Rippe,et al.  Ficoll and dextran vs. globular proteins as probes for testing glomerular permselectivity: effects of molecular size, shape, charge, and deformability. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[19]  Hans J. Vogel,et al.  Calmodulin’s flexibility allows for promiscuity in its interactions with target proteins and peptides , 2004, Molecular biotechnology.

[20]  R. Overend,et al.  A generalized correlation for the viscosity of dextrans in aqueous solutions as a function of temperature, concentration, and molecular weight at low shear rates , 1989 .

[21]  G. E. Babcock,et al.  Viscosity, sedimentation, and light-scattering properties of fraction of an acid-hydrolyzed dextran† , 1955 .

[22]  F. Rondelez,et al.  Sedimentation of large colloidal particles through semidilute polymer solutions , 1978 .

[23]  G. Phillies Derivation of the Universal Scaling Equation of the Hydrodynamic Scaling Model via Renormalization Group Analysis , 1998 .

[24]  A S Verkman,et al.  Molecular crowding reduces to a similar extent the diffusion of small solutes and macromolecules: measurement by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy , 2004, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[25]  Guoqing Shen,et al.  Excitation saturation in two-photon fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2003, Applied optics.

[26]  F. Bovey Enzymatic polymerization. I. Molecular weight and branching during the formation of dextran , 1959 .

[27]  G. Phillies Optical Probe Diffusion in Polymer Solutions , 2007, 0705.3222.

[28]  G. Phillies,et al.  Probe diffusion in polymer solutions under .THETA. and good conditions , 1993 .

[29]  J. Korlach,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with single-molecule sensitivity on cell and model membranes. , 1999, Cytometry.

[30]  K. Berland,et al.  Observation Volumes and γ-Factors in Two-Photon Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy , 2005 .

[31]  Irina A. Shkel,et al.  Crowding and Confinement Effects on Protein Diffusion In Vivo , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  B. Ware,et al.  Self-diffusion and probe diffusion in dilute and semidilute aqueous solutions of dextran , 1991 .

[33]  G. Phillies,et al.  Macroparticle diffusion in dextran solutions , 1989 .

[34]  A. Dunn,et al.  Influence of optical properties on two-photon fluorescence imaging in turbid samples. , 2000, Applied optics.

[35]  W. Webb,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: diagnostics for sparse molecules. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. Bryan,et al.  Maximum entropy analysis of oversampled data problems , 1990, European Biophysics Journal.

[37]  K. Granath Solution properties of branched dextrans , 1958 .

[38]  K. Berland,et al.  Fluorescence intensity is a poor predictor of saturation effects in two‐photon microscopy: Artifacts in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy , 2007, Microscopy research and technique.

[39]  X. Zhu,et al.  Physical models of diffusion for polymer solutions, gels and solids , 1999 .

[40]  F. Horkay,et al.  Probe diffusion in aqueous poly(vinyl alcohol) solutions studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.