Understanding factors affecting users' social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective

[1]  David Eichelberger,et al.  Handbook Of Psychological Testing , 2016 .

[2]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  Gifting and Status in Virtual Worlds , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Research Note - Continued Participation in Online Innovation Communities: Does Community Response Matter Equally for Everyone? , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The role of theory in gender and information systems research , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[5]  T. Eckes,et al.  Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities : A Current Appraisal , 2012 .

[6]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Attracted to or Locked In? Predicting Continuance Intention in Social Virtual World Services , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[8]  Nancy K. Lankton,et al.  Examining Two Expectation Disconfirmation Theory Models: Assimilation and Asymmetry Effects , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Factors Affecting Bloggers' Knowledge Sharing: An Investigation Across Gender , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Helmut Leopold,et al.  Social Media , 2012, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[11]  Tung Bui,et al.  Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[12]  Efraim Turban,et al.  What Drives Social Commerce: The Role of Social Support and Relationship Quality , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[13]  Robert E. Crossler,et al.  Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[14]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  User Acceptance of Agile Information Systems: A Model and Empirical Test , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Byoungsoo Kim,et al.  Understanding Antecedents of Continuance Intention in Social-Networking Services , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  S. G. Mazman,et al.  Gender Differences in Using Social Networks. , 2011 .

[18]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[19]  Ling Zhu,et al.  Understanding Continuance Usage of Social Networking Services: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Study of the Chinese Context , 2011, ICIS.

[20]  Pekka Aula.  Social media, reputation risk and ambient publicity management , 2010 .

[21]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  E XPECTATION D ISCONFIRMATION AND T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION : P OLYNOMIAL M ODELING AND R ESPONSE S URFACE A NALYSIS 1 , 2010 .

[23]  Varun Grover,et al.  Investigating Two Contradictory Views of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2010, MIS Q..

[24]  George R. Milne,et al.  Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users , 2010 .

[25]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Nan Wang,et al.  Emergent leadership, Gender, and Culture: The Case of Sri Lanka , 2010, AMCIS.

[28]  Mary Madden and Aaron Smith,et al.  Reputation Management and Social Media , 2010 .

[29]  France Bélanger,et al.  Gender-Based Differences in Consumer E-Commerce Adoption , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Understanding the role of gender in bloggers' switching behavior , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Retaining women in the U.S. IT workforce: theorizing the influence of organizational factors , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jyh-Shen Chiou,et al.  The effect of community identification on attitude and intention toward a blogging community , 2009, Internet Res..

[33]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Assessing Between-Group Differences in Information Systems Research: A Comparison of Covariance-and Component-Based SEM , 2009, MIS Q..

[34]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Generations online in 2009 , 2009 .

[35]  Xiaohui Yu,et al.  Understanding Continuance Intention in E-learning Community , 2009, AMCIS.

[36]  Seounmi Youn,et al.  Gender and Online Privacy among Teens: Risk Perception, Privacy Concerns, and Protection Behaviors , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Hock Chuan Chan,et al.  Understanding Users' Continuance of Facebook: The Role of General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy , 2008, ICIS.

[38]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[40]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[43]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[44]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace , 2007, AMCIS.

[45]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[46]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Concern for Information Privacy and Online Consumer Purchasing , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[48]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  P. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Environments: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2006 .

[50]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[51]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Continuance in Expertise-Sharing Networks : A Social Perspective , 2005 .

[53]  HeijdenHans.  User acceptance of hedonic information systems , 2004 .

[54]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[55]  Alison Adam,et al.  A Decade of Neglect: Reflecting on Gender and IS , 2004 .

[56]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[57]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[58]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BUYING ONLINE AND THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVING A SITE RECOMMENDATION , 2004 .

[59]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[61]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  John A. List,et al.  Gender differences in revealed risk taking: evidence from mutual fund investors , 2002 .

[63]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[64]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[65]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  M. Lohan.  Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies , 2000 .

[68]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[69]  J. Wajcman.  Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: , 2000 .

[70]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[71]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[72]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[73]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[75]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[76]  David Ansic,et al.  Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. , 1997 .

[77]  J. Archer,et al.  Sex differences in social behavior. Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? , 1996, The American psychologist.

[78]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction , 1996 .

[79]  L. Sproull,et al.  Atheism, sex, and databases: the net as a social technology , 1995 .

[80]  R. Oliver.  Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. , 1993 .

[81]  E. Anderson,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms , 1993 .

[82]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[83]  A. Eagly,et al.  Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Perspective , 1991 .

[84]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[85]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[86]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[87]  A. Eagly.  Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[88]  R. Oliver.  A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[89]  Joseph Gray Jackson,et al.  Privacy and Freedom , 1968 .