Measuring third stream activities

[1]  Paula E. Stephan.  Educational Implications of University–Industry Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[2]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[3]  Jordi Molas-Gallart,et al.  Assessing the non-academic impact of grant-funded socio-economic research: results from a pilot study. , 2000 .

[4]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn) , 2001 .

[5]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities , 2001 .

[6]  Jan Currie,et al.  Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives , 2000 .

[7]  Stephen Cole,et al.  The Ortega Hypothesis , 1972, Science.

[8]  Eric P. Chiang,et al.  Industry-University Cooperative Research Centers , 2000 .

[9]  Denis O. Gray,et al.  Industry–University Research Centers: A Multivariate Analysis of Member Retention , 2001 .

[10]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Role of the University: Leveraging Talent, not Technology. , 1999 .

[11]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[12]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[13]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Combining management consultancy and research , 1996 .

[14]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[15]  Christian Rammer,et al.  Benchmarking industry—science relations: the role of framework conditions , 2001 .

[16]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes , 1998 .

[17]  T. Keelin,et al.  How SmithKline Beecham makes better resource-allocation decisions. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[18]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[19]  C. Debresson,et al.  Networks of innovators:A review and introduction to the issue , 1991 .

[20]  Sally A. Rood.  Government Laboratory Technology Transfer: Process and Impact , 2000 .

[21]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[22]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selecting R&D projects at BMW: a case study of adopting mathematical programming models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[23]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Research excellence and patented innovation , 2000 .

[24]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Policy Research in the Context of Diffuse Decision Making. , 1982 .

[25]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[26]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[27]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[28]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[29]  Louis G. Tornatzky.  Benchmarking University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Six Year Retrospective , 2001 .

[30]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .