Degrees of Freedom of the MIMO X Channel

We provide achievability as well as converse results for the degrees of freedom region of a MIMO X channel, i.e., a system with two transmitters, two receivers, each equipped with multiple antennas, where independent messages need to be conveyed over fixed channels from each transmitter to each receiver. The inner and outerbounds on the degrees of freedom region are tight whenever integer degrees of freedom are optimal for each message. If all nodes have equal number of antennas M > 1 and channel matrices are non-degenerate then the degrees of freedom etaX* = 4/3 M. If the channels vary with time/frequency then the X channel with single antennas (M = 1) at all nodes has 4/3 degrees of freedom. Thus, the MIMO X channel has non-integer degrees of freedom when M is not a multiple of 3. Simple zero forcing without dirty paper encoding or successive decoding, suffices to achieve the 4/3 M degrees of freedom in all cases. The key idea for the achievability of the degrees of freedom is interference alignment - i.e., signal spaces are aligned at receivers where they constitute interference while they are separable at receivers where they are desired. With equal number of antennas at all nodes, we also explore the increase in degrees of freedom when some of the messages are made available to a transmitter or receiver in the manner of cognitive radio.

[1]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in multiple-access channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[3]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Achievable rates in cognitive radio channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  On the Compound MIMO Broadcast Channel , 2007 .

[5]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Communication Over MIMO X Channels: Interference Alignment, Decomposition, and Performance Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Vahid Tarokh,et al.  On the degrees-of-freedom of the MIMO interference channel , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[7]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Degrees of Freedom for the MIMO Interference Channel , 2006, ISIT.

[8]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  A Linear Interference Network with Local Side-Information , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[9]  Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali,et al.  Communication over MIMO X Channel: Signalling and Performance Analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Degrees of Freedom on the MIMO X Channel - the Optimality of the MMK Scheme , 2006 .

[11]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Degrees of Freedom Region of the MIMO $X$ Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Signaling over MIMO Multi-Base Systems: Combination of Multi-Access and Broadcast Schemes , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[13]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  The Capacity Region of the Degraded MIMO Compound Broadcast Channel , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[14]  Natasha Devroye,et al.  The Multiplexing Gain of MIMO X-Channels with Partial Transmit Side-Information , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  Wei Yu,et al.  Sum capacity of Gaussian vector broadcast channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  David Tse,et al.  Sum capacity of the vector Gaussian broadcast channel and uplink-downlink duality , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Duality, achievable rates, and sum-rate capacity of Gaussian MIMO broadcast channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.