Estimation of failure probabilities by local approximation of the limit state function

For failure probability estimates of large structural systems, the numerical expensive evaluations of the limit state function have to be replaced by suitable approximations. Most of the methods proposed in the literature so far construct global approximations of the failure hypersurface. Rather than concentrating on the construction of the failure hypersurface, an adaptive local approximation scheme for the limit state function that is based on the moving least squares method is proposed in this study. It integrates well with existing importance sampling schemes and yields both efficient and robust estimates of the failure probability.

[1]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[2]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[3]  P. Das,et al.  Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[5]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[6]  F. S. Wong,et al.  Slope Reliability and Response Surface Method , 1985 .

[7]  David Levin,et al.  The approximation power of moving least-squares , 1998, Math. Comput..

[8]  P. Lancaster,et al.  Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods , 1981 .

[9]  D. Frangopol,et al.  Hyperspace division method for structural reliability , 1994 .

[10]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[11]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .

[12]  L. Schueremans,et al.  Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study , 2001 .

[14]  H. Gomes,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND NEURAL NETWORK WITH OTHER METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[15]  Christian Bucher,et al.  Polyhedral response surfaces for structural reliability assessment , 2000 .

[16]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[17]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[18]  G. Box The Exploration and Exploitation of Response Surfaces: Some General Considerations and Examples , 1954 .

[19]  C. Bucher Adaptive sampling — an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure , 1988 .

[20]  L. Faravelli Response‐Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[21]  Jian Deng,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network , 2006 .

[22]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[23]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  MULTITANGENT-PLANE SURFACE METHOD FOR RELIABILITY CALCULATION , 1997 .

[24]  G. L. Ang,et al.  Kernel Method in Importance Sampling Density Estimation , 1990 .

[25]  G. Schuëller,et al.  A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities , 1987 .

[26]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[27]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .