Dynamic credit allocation in scientific literature
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[2] James A. Evans,et al. Future Science , 2013, Science.
[3] Donald Kennedy,et al. Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems , 2003, Science.
[4] L. Egghe,et al. Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.
[5] 魏屹东,et al. Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.
[6] Santo Fortunato,et al. Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[7] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.
[8] M. Hochberg,et al. Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.
[9] M. Newman. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] Ç. Şekercioğlu. Quantifying Coauthor Contributions , 2008, Science.
[11] S. Redner. Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review , 2005, physics/0506056.
[12] Jana Diesner,et al. Distortive effects of initial‐based name disambiguation on measurements of large‐scale coauthorship networks , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[13] W Foulkes,et al. Relative contribution should be given after each author's name , 1996, BMJ.
[14] J. Hirsch. Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis , 2008, PloS one.
[16] W. Foulkes,et al. Relative contribution should be given after each author's name , 1996 .
[17] Geoffroy de Clippel,et al. Impartial division of a dollar , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.
[18] Liaojun Pang,et al. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[19] A. Barabasi,et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , 2016, Science.
[20] Joon-Oh Park,et al. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .
[21] Jeffrey R. Biggs. Allocating the Credit in Collaborative Research , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[22] Marjorie M. K. Hlava,et al. Publishing: Credit where credit is due , 2014, Nature.
[23] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Collective credit allocation in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] Filippo Menczer,et al. Universality of scholarly impact metrics , 2013, J. Informetrics.
[25] A. D. Jackson,et al. Measures for measures , 2006, Nature.
[26] Andreas Strotmann,et al. Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author-based citation analysis? , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Chun-Ting Zhang,et al. A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank , 2009, EMBO reports.
[28] E. Garfield. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.