Operational Protocols for the Use of Drones in Marine Animal Research

The use of drones to study marine animals shows promise for the examination of numerous aspects of their ecology, behaviour, health and movement patterns. However, the responses of some marine phyla to the presence of drones varies broadly, as do the general operational protocols used to study them. Inconsistent methodological approaches could lead to difficulties comparing studies and can call into question the repeatability of research. This review draws on current literature and researchers with a wealth of practical experience to outline the idiosyncrasies of studying various marine taxa with drones. We also outline current best practice for drone operation in marine environments based on the literature and our practical experience in the field. The protocols outlined herein will be of use to researchers interested in incorporating drones as a tool into their research on marine animals and will help form consistent approaches for drone-based studies in the future.

[1]  Simon J. Goodman,et al.  Global threats to pinnipeds , 2012 .

[2]  Qingsong Wang,et al.  A review of lithium ion battery failure mechanisms and fire prevention strategies , 2019, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science.

[3]  Paul R. Wade,et al.  CALCULATING LIMITS TO THE ALLOWABLE HUMAN‐CAUSED MORTALITY OF CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS , 1998 .

[4]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Global spatial risk assessment of sharks under the footprint of fisheries , 2019, Nature.

[5]  D. Pagendam,et al.  Assessing White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) Behavior Along Coastal Beaches for Conservation-Focused Shark Mitigation , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.

[6]  B. Cullis,et al.  Beach safety: can drones provide a platform for sighting sharks? , 2019, Wildlife Research.

[7]  Lars Bejder,et al.  Embracing conservation success of recovering humpback whale populations: Evaluating the case for downlisting their conservation status in Australia , 2016 .

[8]  F. Lombard,et al.  Jellyfish blooms: advances and challenges , 2018 .

[9]  Eliza E. Moskowitz,et al.  Aerial drone misadventure: A novel case of trauma resulting in ocular globe rupture , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology case reports.

[10]  Giovanna Jona Lasinio,et al.  A low-cost drone based application for identifying and mapping of coastal fish nursery grounds , 2016 .

[11]  D. Kurouski,et al.  Raman Spectroscopy vs Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction In Early Stage Huanglongbing Diagnostics , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[12]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses , 2018, Polar Biology.

[13]  D. N. Castelblanco-Martínez,et al.  Using small drones to photo-identify Antillean manatees: a novel method for monitoring an endangered marine mammal in the Caribbean Sea , 2020 .

[14]  D. Irschick,et al.  Estimating body mass of free‐living whales using aerial photogrammetry and 3D volumetrics , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[15]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  A Method for Capturing Dugongs (Dugong dugon) in Open Water , 2006 .

[16]  L. Carraro,et al.  The use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to sample the blow microbiome of small cetaceans , 2020, PloS one.

[17]  Graham Rush,et al.  Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony‐nesting seabirds , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[18]  M. Oliveira-da-Costa,et al.  Effectiveness of unmanned aerial vehicles to detect Amazon dolphins , 2019, Oryx.

[19]  S. Dawson,et al.  Inexpensive Aerial Photogrammetry for Studies of Whales and Large Marine Animals , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[20]  P. Ross.  Marine Mammals as Sentinels in Ecological Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[21]  Antoine M. Dujon,et al.  Noninvasive unmanned aerial vehicle provides estimates of the energetic cost of reproduction in humpback whales , 2016 .

[22]  Michael C. Hatfield,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology , 2016 .

[23]  K. Lohmann,et al.  Quantifying Nearshore Sea Turtle Densities: Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Population Assessments , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Rapid condition monitoring of an endangered marine vertebrate using precise, non-invasive morphometrics , 2020 .

[25]  David J. Klein,et al.  A convolutional neural network for detecting sea turtles in drone imagery , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[26]  P. Madsen,et al.  Southern right whales show no behavioral response to low noise levels from a nearby unmanned aerial vehicle , 2020, Marine Mammal Science.

[27]  Margaret Kalacska,et al.  Freshwater Fish Habitat Complexity Mapping Using Above and Underwater Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[28]  I. Santos,et al.  Whale carcass scavenging by sharks , 2019, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[29]  H. Peter,et al.  Sensitivity of Adélie and Gentoo penguins to various flight activities of a micro UAV , 2018, Polar Biology.

[30]  J. Lanyon.  Distribution and abundance of dugongs in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia , 2003 .

[31]  D. Gendron,et al.  A novel non‐invasive tool for disease surveillance of free‐ranging whales and its relevance to conservation programs , 2010 .

[32]  A. Friedlaender,et al.  Initial density estimates of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in the inshore waters of the western Antarctic Peninsula during the late autumn , 2012 .

[33]  P. Boveng,et al.  Evaluation of a ship-based unoccupied aircraft system (UAS) for surveys of spotted and ribbon seals in the Bering Sea pack ice1 , 2015 .

[34]  Claire Burke,et al.  Optimizing observing strategies for monitoring animals using drone-mounted thermal infrared cameras , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[35]  Lance G. Barrett-Lennard,et al.  Extensive Core Microbiome in Drone-Captured Whale Blow Supports a Framework for Health Monitoring , 2017, mSystems.

[36]  David W Johnston,et al.  Unoccupied Aircraft Systems in Marine Science and Conservation. , 2019, Annual review of marine science.

[37]  Fredrik Christiansen,et al.  Noise Levels of Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Implications for Potential Underwater Impacts on Marine Mammals , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[38]  D. Johnston,et al.  Applying Unoccupied Aircraft Systems to Study Human Behavior in Marine Science and Conservation Programs , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[39]  G. Hays,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in the Trophic Importance of Jellyfish? , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  P. Kinas,et al.  First abundance estimate of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in Brazil by aerial survey , 2015, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[41]  F. Scarton,et al.  Drones Improve Effectiveness and Reduce Disturbance of Censusing Common Redshanks Tringa totanus Breeding on Salt Marshes , 2020, Ardea.

[42]  V. Raoult,et al.  Rapid biomass and size-frequency estimates of edible jellyfish populations using drones , 2018, Fisheries Research.

[43]  Blake M. Allan,et al.  Free as a drone: ecologists can add UAVs to their toolbox , 2015 .

[44]  Blake M. Allan,et al.  A Rapid UAV Method for Assessing Body Condition in Fur Seals , 2019, Drones.

[45]  D. Bird,et al.  Population Census of a Large Common Tern Colony with a Small Unmanned Aircraft , 2015, PloS one.

[46]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  Aerial survey as a tool to estimate whale shark abundance trends , 2009 .

[47]  Ved Chirayath,et al.  Drones that see through waves – preliminary results from airborne fluid lensing for centimetre-scale aquatic conservation , 2016 .

[48]  S. B. Bengtson Nash,et al.  Variation in outer blubber lipid concentration does not reflect morphological body condition in humpback whales , 2020, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[49]  C. Navas,et al.  Thermal Imaging Reveals Changes in Body Surface Temperatures of Blacktip Sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) during Air Exposure , 2018, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[50]  Jonathan D. Burnett,et al.  Insight into the kinematics of blue whale surface foraging through drone observations and prey data , 2020, PeerJ.

[51]  L. SweeneyKathryn,et al.  A novel approach to compare pinniped populations across a broad geographic range , 2015 .

[52]  G. Rieucau,et al.  Use of Drones in Fishery Science , 2019, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.

[53]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  G. Bota,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of colony formation and nesting success in birds , 2017 .

[55]  Alexandre C. G. Schimel,et al.  A new perspective of storm bite on sandy beaches using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2016 .

[56]  Ohseok Kwon,et al.  The use of conservation drones in ecology and wildlife research , 2015 .

[57]  P. K. Anderson.  Habitat, Niche, and Evolution of Sirenian Mating Systems , 2002, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[58]  Antoine Collin,et al.  Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques , 2017, Coral Reefs.

[59]  Trevor R. Spradlin,et al.  Assessment of known impacts of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) on marine mammals: data gaps and recommendations for researchers in the United States1 , 2016 .

[60]  Travis W. Horton,et al.  Doctor Drone: Non-invasive Measurement of Humpback Whale Vital Signs Using Unoccupied Aerial System Infrared Thermography , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[61]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Bottlenose Dolphins and Antillean Manatees Respond to Small Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[62]  Marla M. Holt,et al.  Why whales are big but not bigger: Physiological drivers and ecological limits in the age of ocean giants , 2019, Science.

[63]  D. Rossmo,et al.  Hunting patterns and geographic profiling of white shark predation , 2009 .

[64]  Hassan Noura,et al.  Emergency Control of AR Drone Quadrotor UAV Suffering a Total Loss of One Rotor , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[65]  W. Perryman,et al.  Photogrammetry of killer whales using a small hexacopter launched at sea1 , 2015 .

[66]  E. Pakhomov,et al.  Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to measure jellyfish aggregations , 2017 .

[67]  Antoine M. Dujon,et al.  Importance of machine learning for enhancing ecological studies using information-rich imagery , 2019, Endangered Species Research.

[68]  B. Würsig,et al.  Mating patterns of dusky dolphins ( Lagenorhynchus obscurus ) explored using an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2020 .

[69]  Paulo Nunes,et al.  AragoJ: A free, open‐source software to aid single camera photogrammetry studies , 2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[70]  Tim van Emmerik,et al.  Riverine Plastic Litter Monitoring Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[71]  Johann Mourier,et al.  Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to investigate shark and ray densities in a shallow coral lagoon , 2016 .

[72]  Douglas J. Krause,et al.  A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators , 2015, Polar Biology.

[73]  I. Jonsen,et al.  An Economical Custom-Built Drone for Assessing Whale Health , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[74]  P. Pomeroy,et al.  Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK , 2015 .

[75]  P. Dann,et al.  Looking Without Landing—Using Remote Piloted Aircraft to Monitor Fur Seal Populations Without Disturbance , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[76]  Ashray A. Doshi,et al.  Behaviour reactions of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[77]  Mitchell B. Lyons,et al.  Monitoring large and complex wildlife aggregations with drones , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[78]  R. Clarke,et al.  Remotely piloted aircraft improve precision of capture–mark–resight population estimates of Australian fur seals , 2019, Ecosphere.

[79]  Scot E. Smith,et al.  Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Low-Altitude Aerial Surveys , 2010 .

[80]  D. Johnston,et al.  Assessing the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada , 2018, PeerJ.

[81]  Karen E. Joyce,et al.  Principles and practice of acquiring drone-based image data in marine environments , 2019, Marine and Freshwater Research.

[82]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Ocean-wide tracking of pelagic sharks reveals extent of overlap with longline fishing hotspots , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  Daniel Gonzalez-Socoloske,et al.  Detection of free-ranging West Indian manatees Trichechus manatus using side-scan sonar , 2009 .

[84]  T. Tucker,et al.  Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds , 2018, PloS one.

[85]  A. Terauds,et al.  PUP PRODUCTION AND POPULATION TRENDS OF THE AUSTRALIAN FUR SEAL (ARCTOCEPHALUS PUSILLUS DORIFERUS) , 2005 .

[86]  A. C. Seymour,et al.  Automated detection and enumeration of marine wildlife using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and thermal imagery , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[87]  Population density and abundance of basking sharks Cetorhinus maximus in the lower Bay of Fundy, Canada , 2014 .

[88]  B. Kelaher,et al.  Comparison of sampling precision for nearshore marine wildlife using unmanned and manned aerial surveys , 2020 .

[89]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  ESTIMATING SURVIVAL AND CAPTURE PROBABILITY OF FUR SEAL PUPS USING MULTISTATE MARK–RECAPTURE MODELS , 2003 .

[90]  D. Gendron,et al.  Effect of drone-based blow sampling on blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) behavior , 2018 .

[91]  Geoff Groom,et al.  Remote sensing image data and automated analysis to describe marine bird distributions and abundances , 2013, Ecol. Informatics.

[92]  M. Bishop,et al.  Assessing variation in assemblages of large marine fauna off ocean beaches using drones , 2020 .

[93]  B. Bruce,et al.  Use of stereo baited remote underwater video systems to estimate the presence and size of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) , 2017 .

[94]  Johann Mourier,et al.  Using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys and image analysis in the study of large surface-associated marine species: a case study on reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus shoaling behaviour. , 2018, Journal of fish biology.

[95]  David Peel,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[96]  M. Manuel,et al.  Testing marine conservation applications of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in a remote marine protected area , 2015 .

[97]  G. Schofield,et al.  Drones for research on sea turtles and other marine vertebrates – A review , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[98]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Apex predatory sharks and crocodiles simultaneously scavenge a whale carcass , 2018, Journal of Ethology.

[99]  Louise Tosetto,et al.  Drone-Based High-Resolution Tracking of Aquatic Vertebrates , 2018, Drones.

[100]  D. Pagendam,et al.  Reliability of marine faunal detections in drone-based monitoring , 2019, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[101]  G. Schofield,et al.  Aerial and underwater surveys reveal temporal variation in cleaning-station use by sea turtles at a temperate breeding area , 2017 .

[102]  Daniele Ventura,et al.  Mapping and Classification of Ecologically Sensitive Marine Habitats Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery and Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[103]  J. Rowland,et al.  Drone with thermal infrared camera provides high resolution georeferenced imagery of the Waikite geothermal area, New Zealand , 2016 .

[104]  Michele Thums,et al.  Translating Marine Animal Tracking Data into Conservation Policy and Management. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[105]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  From early life to senescence: individual heterogeneity in a long‐lived seabird , 2017, Ecological monographs.

[106]  G. Rathbun,et al.  Analysis of propeller wounds on manatees in Florida , 1982 .

[107]  C. Soldatini,et al.  A new use of technology to solve an old problem: Estimating the population size of a burrow nesting seabird , 2018, PloS one.

[108]  A. Hodgson,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Surveying Marine Fauna: A Dugong Case Study , 2013, PloS one.

[109]  Julian A. Tyne,et al.  Challenges of collecting blow from small cetaceans , 2019, Ecosphere.

[110]  William T. Gough,et al.  Scaling of swimming performance in baleen whales , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[111]  D. Weller,et al.  Responsible Practices for Minimizing and Monitoring Environmental Impacts of Marine Seismic Surveys with an Emphasis on Marine Mammals , 2013 .

[112]  M. Cody,et al.  Observer variability in pinniped counts: Ground-based enumeration of walruses at haul-out sites , 2005 .

[113]  K. Pitt,et al.  Temporal variation in the virgin biomass of the edible jellyfish, Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae). , 2003 .

[114]  B. Lynch,et al.  Performance of manned and unmanned aerial surveys to collect visual data and imagery for estimating arctic cetacean density and associated uncertainty , 2018, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems.

[115]  A. Friedlaender,et al.  Return movement of a humpback whale between the Antarctic Peninsula and American Samoa: a seasonal migration record , 2011 .

[116]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Estuarine crocodiles ride surface currents to facilitate long-distance travel. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[117]  S. Wich,et al.  Counting crocodiles from the sky: monitoring the critically endangered gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) population with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2018, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems.

[118]  P. Dann,et al.  Drivers and annual estimates of marine wildlife entanglement rates: A long-term case study with Australian fur seals. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[119]  R. Angliss,et al.  Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results , 2018, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems.

[120]  Xin Li,et al.  Weight threshold estimation of falling UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) based on impact energy , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[121]  Douglas J. Krause,et al.  State of knowledge: Antarctic wildlife response to unmanned aerial systems , 2018, Polar Biology.

[122]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review , 2017, PloS one.

[123]  P. Enderlein,et al.  A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs1 , 2015 .

[124]  P. Jepson,et al.  Criteria and case definitions for serious injury and death of pinnipeds and cetaceans caused by anthropogenic trauma. , 2013, Diseases of aquatic organisms.

[125]  R. Ormond,et al.  Are close-following and breaching behaviours by basking sharks at aggregation sites related to courtship? , 2018, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[126]  C. Daly,et al.  Life after death: behaviour of multiple shark species scavenging a whale carcass , 2019, Marine and Freshwater Research.

[127]  R. Elsey,et al.  The Use of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Locate Alligator Nests , 2016, Southeastern Naturalist.

[128]  T. Patterson,et al.  Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of immature Australasian white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[129]  E. Holmes,et al.  Virological Sampling of Inaccessible Wildlife with Drones , 2018, Viruses.

[130]  M. Fuentes,et al.  Resilience of marine turtle regional management units to climate change , 2013, Global change biology.

[131]  Use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for mark-resight nesting population estimation of adult female green sea turtles at Raine Island , 2020, PloS one.

[132]  C. Layman,et al.  Using a small, consumer grade drone to identify and count marine megafauna in shallow habitats , 2018, Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research.

[133]  D. Johnston,et al.  Shark detection probability from aerial drone surveys within a temperate estuary , 2020 .

[134]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans , 2017, bioRxiv.

[135]  B. Kelaher,et al.  The potential for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to conduct marine fauna surveys in place of manned aircraft , 2018 .

[136]  Corey T. Callaghan,et al.  Bird interactions with drones, from individuals to large colonies , 2017, bioRxiv.

[137]  G. Schofield,et al.  Detecting elusive aspects of wildlife ecology using drones: new insights on the mating dynamics and operational sex ratios of sea turtles , 2017 .

[138]  S. Kajiura,et al.  Adult blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) use shallow water as a refuge from great hammerheads (Sphyrna mokarran). , 2020, Journal of fish biology.

[139]  D. Bird,et al.  Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[140]  M. Westoby,et al.  Assessing climate change associated sea‐level rise impacts on sea turtle nesting beaches using drones, photogrammetry and a novel GPS system , 2018, Global change biology.

[141]  W. J. Nichols,et al.  Are we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles , 2016 .

[142]  Joshua T. Ackerman,et al.  Effects of investigator disturbance on hatching success and nest-site fidelity in a long-lived seabird, Leach's storm-petrel , 2004 .