Supporting Structured Data Capture for Patients With Cancer: An Initiative of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program to Improve Capture of Malignant Diagnosis and Cancer Staging Data.

PURPOSE Structured data elements within electronic health records are health-related information that can be entered, stored, and extracted in an organized manner at later time points. Tracking outcomes for cancer survivors is also enabled by structured data. We sought to increase structured data capture within oncology practices at multiple sites sharing the same electronic health records. METHODS Applying engineering approaches and the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, we launched dual quality improvement initiatives to ensure that a malignant diagnosis and stage were captured as structured data. Intervention: Close Visit Validation (CVV) requires providers to satisfy certain criteria before closing ambulatory encounters. CVV may be used to track open clinical encounters and chart delinquencies to encourage optimal clinical workflows. We added two cancer-specific required criteria at the time of closing encounters in oncology clinics: (1) the presence of at least one malignant diagnosis on the Problem List and (2) staging all the malignant diagnoses on the Problem List when appropriate. RESULTS Six months before the CVV implementation, the percentage of encounters with a malignant diagnosis on the Problem List at the time of the encounter was 65%, whereas the percentage of encounters with a staged diagnosis was 32%. Three months after cancer-specific CVV implementation, the percentages were 85% and 75%, respectively. Rates had increased to 90% and 88% more than 2 years after implementation. CONCLUSION Oncologist performance improved after the implementation of cancer-specific CVV criteria, with persistently high percentages of relevant malignant diagnoses and cancer stage structured data capture 2 years after the intervention.

[1]  J. Califano,et al.  A Hospital-Wide Intervention to Improve Compliance With TNM Cancer Staging Documentation. , 2021, The Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

[2]  A. Shah,et al.  Data gaps in electronic health record (EHR) systems: An audit of problem list completeness during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, International Journal of Medical Informatics.

[3]  Michael Lawrence Barnett,et al.  Association of Peer Comparison Emails With Electronic Health Record Documentation of Cancer Stage by Oncologists , 2020, JAMA network open.

[4]  Robert W. Follett,et al.  Impact of a “Chart Closure” Hard Stop Alert on Prescribing for Elevated Blood Pressures Among Patients With Diabetes: Quasi-Experimental Study , 2019, JMIR medical informatics.

[5]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Structured Data Acquisition in Oncology , 2019, Oncology.

[6]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Practicing Clinicians’ Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study , 2019, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  Eneida A. Mendonça,et al.  Survivor and Clinician Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: An Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health. , 2019, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[8]  Hyoun-Joong Kong,et al.  Managing Unstructured Big Data in Healthcare System , 2019, Healthcare informatics research.

[9]  B. Hesse,et al.  Moving beyond static survivorship care plans: A systems engineering approach to population health management for cancer survivors , 2018, Cancer.

[10]  John D Clark,et al.  SNOMED CT Concept Hierarchies for Sharing Definitions of Clinical Conditions Using Electronic Health Record Data , 2018, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[11]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record , 2018, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[12]  Abhishek Pandey,et al.  Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  C. Compton,et al.  The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population‐based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  F. Davidoff,et al.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) , 2015, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.