Investigation of Monotonic and Cyclic Behavior of Tripod Suction Bucket Foundations for Offshore Wind Towers Using Centrifuge Modeling

This paper performed centrifuge load tests of a tripod bucket foundation preliminarily designed as a supporting system of wind turbines and compared the results to those obtained from a test of a monopod bucket foundation. The tripod foundation prototype studied in this study has three bucket caissons, each of which is 6.5 m in diameter and 8.0 m in length. The center-to-center distance between the buckets was 26.9 m. The site is composed of an 11-m thick layer of dense silty sand overlying a thick sandy silt layer. The horizontal load was applied at a height of 33 m from the seabed floor according to the design load condition, and the vertical load was simulated by the self-weight of the model. The moment-rotation angle curves for the tripod foundations were compared with that of the monopod bucket foundation. The moment-rotation curve of the tripod was nearly bilinear, whereas that of the monopod showed a gradual decrease in slope. The yield moment for the tripod foundation was half that of the monopod, but the rotation angle for the yield moment was only 20% that of the monopod. The behavior of the tripod foundation under a cyclic load with respect to the accumulated plastic deformation has also been examined in this study. When the resultant moment of cyclic loading was smaller than the monotonic yield moment, negligible accumulated plastic deformation was observed for both one-way and two-way loading. However, when the resultant moment was higher than the monotonic yield moment, significant cumulated deformation resulted.

[1]  Marc Senders,et al.  Suction caissons in sand as tripod foundations for offshore wind turbines , 2009 .

[2]  ZhuBin,et al.  Installation and lateral loading tests of suction caissons in silt , 2011 .

[3]  Felipe Alberto Villalobos Jara.  Model testing of foundations for offshore wind turbines , 2006 .

[4]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Failure envelopes for offshore shallow foundations under general loading , 2007 .

[5]  S. Bang,et al.  Inclined Loading Capacity of Suction Piles , 2002 .

[6]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand , 1999 .

[7]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Combined loading of skirted foundations , 1998 .

[8]  M. Randolph,et al.  Punch-through and liquefaction induced failure of shallow foundations on calcareous sediments , 1994 .

[9]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Long-Term Lateral Cyclic Response of Suction Caisson Foundations in Sand , 2013 .

[10]  G. Houlsby,et al.  Foundations for offshore wind turbines , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Byron W. Byrne,et al.  Suction caissons for wind turbines , 2005 .

[12]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  Effect of Penetration Rate on Cone Penetration Resistance in Saturated Clayey Soils , 2008 .

[13]  Byron W. Byrne,et al.  Suction Caisson Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines and Anemometer Masts , 2000 .

[14]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE DRAINED CAPACITY OF SUCTION CAISSON FOUNDATIONS UNDER MONOTONIC LOADING FOR OFFSHORE APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[15]  Byron W. Byrne,et al.  Response of stiff piles in sand to long-term cyclic lateral loading , 2010 .

[16]  Dong-Soo Kim,et al.  A newly developed state-of-the-art geotechnical centrifuge in Korea , 2013 .

[17]  S. Bang,et al.  Inclined loading capacity of suction piles in sand , 2011 .