Private Bayesian Persuasion with Monotone Submodular Objectives

We consider a multi-agent Bayesian persuasion problem wher e a sender aims at persuading multiple receivers to maximize a global objective that depends on all the receivers’ actions. We focus on one of the most basic settings in this space where each receiver takes a binary action, conveniently denoted as action 1 and action0. The payoff of the sender is thus a set function, depending on the set of receivers taking action1. Each receiver’s utility depends on his action and a random s tate of nature whose realization is a-priori unknown to receivers. The sender has an informatio n l advantage, namely access to the realized state of nature, and can commit to a policy, a.k.a., a signaling scheme , to send aprivatesignal regarding the realized state to each receiver. Assuming the sender’s utility function is monotone submodular , we examine the sender’s optimization problem under different input models. When the state of nature is binary, we show that a (1 − 1 e )approximate signaling scheme can be explicitly constructe d. This approximation ratio is tight by [5]. Moreover, the constructed signaling scheme has the followi ng d stinctive properties: (i) it signals independently to each receiver, simply to maximize the probab ility of persuading them to take action 1; (ii) it is oblivious in the sense that it does not depend on the sender’s utility function as long as it is monotone submodular! When there are many states of nature, w e present an algorithm that computes a (1− 1 e )-approximate signaling scheme, modulo an additional addit ive loss ofǫ, and runs in time polynomial in the input size and ǫ . Our algorithm here relies on a structural characterizatio n of (approximately) optimal signaling schemes.

[1]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Maximizing a Monotone Submodular Function Subject to a Matroid Constraint , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Isabelle Brocas,et al.  Influence through ignorance , 2007 .

[3]  Shaddin Dughmi,et al.  On the Hardness of Signaling , 2014, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[4]  Yakov Babichenko,et al.  Computational Aspects of Private Bayesian Persuasion , 2016, ArXiv.

[5]  Yun Wang,et al.  Bayesian Persuasion with Multiple Receivers , 2013 .

[6]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Signaling Schemes for Revenue Maximization , 2012, TEAC.

[7]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  Inapproximability Results for Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular Utility Functions , 2005, Algorithmica.

[8]  Mingyu Guo,et al.  Revenue Maximization via Hiding Item Attributes , 2013, IJCAI.

[9]  Wolfgang Gick,et al.  Persuasion by Stress Testing: Optimal Disclosure of Supervisory Information in the Banking Sector , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Li Han,et al.  Mixture Selection, Mechanism Design, and Signaling , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[11]  Itay Goldstein,et al.  Stress Tests and Information Disclosure , 2017, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Shaddin Dughmi,et al.  Persuasion with Limited Communication , 2016, EC.

[13]  D. Mccloskey,et al.  One Quarter of GDP Is Persuasion , 1995 .

[14]  Dirk Bergemann,et al.  Information Structures in Optimal Auctions , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[15]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Constrained Signaling in Auction Design , 2013, SODA.

[16]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Information Disclosure as a Means to Security , 2015, AAMAS.

[17]  Yu Cheng,et al.  Hardness Results for Signaling in Bayesian Zero-Sum and Network Routing Games , 2015, EC.

[18]  Peter Bro Miltersen,et al.  Send mixed signals: earn more, work less , 2012, EC '12.

[19]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Exploring Information Asymmetry in Two-Stage Security Games , 2015, AAAI.

[20]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Maximizing a Submodular Set Function Subject to a Matroid Constraint (Extended Abstract) , 2007, IPCO.

[21]  Ricardo Alonso,et al.  Persuading Voters , 2015 .

[22]  David P. Myatt,et al.  On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design , 2005 .