Intra-institutional prediction of outcome after cardiac surgery: comparison between a locally derived model and the EuroSCORE.

OBJECTIVE To construct models for predicting mortality, morbidity and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay after cardiac surgery and to compare the performance of these models with that of the EuroSCORE in two independent validation databases. METHODS Clinical data on 4592 cardiac surgery patients operated between 1992 and 1996 were retrospectively collected. In order to derive predictive models and to validate them, the patient population was randomly divided into a derivation database (n=3061) and a validation database (n=1531). Variables that were significant in univariate analyses were entered into a backward stepwise logistic regression model. The outcome was defined as mortality within 30 days after surgery, predefined morbidity, and the length of ICU stay lasting >2 days. In addition to the retrospective database, the models were validated also in a prospectively collected database of cardiac surgical patients operated in 1998-1999 (n=821). The EuroSCORE was tested in two validation databases, i.e. the retrospective and prospective one. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was used to study the calibration of the predictive models. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to study the discrimination ability of the models. RESULTS The overall mortality in the retrospective and the prospective data was 2 and 1%, and morbidity 22 and 18%, respectively. The created predictive models fitted well in the validation databases. Our models and the EuroSCORE were equally good in discriminating patients. Thus, in the prospective validation database, the mean areas under the ROC curve for our models and for the EuroSCORE were similar, i.e. 0.84 and 0.77 for mortality, 0.74 and 0.74 for morbidity, and 0.81 and 0.79 for the length of intensive care unit stay lasting for 2 days or more, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our models and the EuroSCORE were equally good in discriminating the patients in respect to outcome. However, our model provided also well calibrated estimation of the probability of prolonged ICU stay for each patient. As was originally suggested, the EuroSCORE may be an appropriate tool in categorizing cardiac surgical patients into various subgroups in interinstitutional comparisons. Our models may have additive value especially in resource allocation and quality assurance purposes for local use.

[1]  B. Griffith,et al.  Risk stratification using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Program. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  R. Salamon,et al.  Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  H. Krumholz Mathematical models and the assessment of performance in cardiology. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Risk factors of delayed extubation, prolonged length of stay in the intensive care unit, and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft with fast-track cardiac anesthesia: a new cardiac risk score. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[5]  T. Takishima,et al.  P wave height during incremental exercise in patients with chronic airway obstruction. , 1992, Chest.

[6]  G. Beck,et al.  Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. , 1992, JAMA.

[7]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Multivariate Prediction of In‐Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 1992 .

[8]  C D Naylor,et al.  Ready-made, recalibrated, or Remodeled? Issues in the use of risk indexes for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  F H Edwards,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Thomas L. Higgins,et al.  Predicting prolonged intensive care unit length-of-stay following coronary artery bypass surgery , 1999 .

[11]  J. Tu,et al.  Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[13]  C A Bodian,et al.  Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  T. Kurki,et al.  Preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[17]  S. Nashef,et al.  Eurp-pean system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro SCORE) , 1999 .

[18]  T. Higgins Quantifying risk and assessing outcome in cardiac surgery. , 1998, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[19]  F L Grover,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database: current status and future directions. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  R. McCarthy,et al.  Morbidity and duration of ICU stay after cardiac surgery. A model for preoperative risk assessment. , 1992, Chest.

[21]  M. Mora,et al.  Mortality prediction in cardiac surgery patients: comparative performance of Parsonnet and general severity systems. , 1999, Circulation.

[22]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.