Analytic framework for assessing participation processes and outcomes of climate change adaptation tools

The assumptions and empirical evidence linking climate change adaptation to development cooperation have led to the emergence of a range of climate change adaptation tools aiming at improving the quality of development cooperation initiatives in times of global change. In order to assess the quality of these tools, we develop an analytic framework to critically assess the social learning and sustainable development outcomes of climate change adaptation tools. The analytic framework defines project objectives, participation typology, participation tools, participation stages, scenarios development, modelling exercises, stakeholder analysis and risk communication strategies that support quality participation outcomes.

[1]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[2]  E. Lisa,et al.  Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Exploring the Linkages , 2007 .

[3]  Danièle Revel,et al.  World Energy Outlook Special Report 2015: Energy and Climate Change , 2015 .

[4]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[5]  J. Sluijs,et al.  The Inclusion of Stakeholder Knowledge and Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change , 2006 .

[6]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[7]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[8]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[9]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Policy relevance of three integrated assessment tools—A comparison with specific reference to agricultural policies , 2010 .

[10]  Linda Sygna,et al.  Vulnerable or Resilient? A Multi-Scale Assessment of Climate Impacts and Vulnerability in Norway , 2004 .

[11]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Towards sustainability in the water sector – The importance of human actors and processes of social learning , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.

[12]  S. Daniels,et al.  Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management , 1996 .

[13]  J. Chevalier,et al.  SAS2: A Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement , 2008 .

[14]  D. C. Sutton Making strategy: the journey of strategic management , 2001 .

[15]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development , 2006 .

[16]  T. Cannon,et al.  Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  Sustainable development: a bird's eye view , 2011 .

[18]  M. Hare,et al.  Stakeholder Categorisation in Participatory Integrated Assessment Processes , 2002 .

[19]  H. Simon Method and Appraisal in Economics: From substantive to procedural rationality , 1976 .

[20]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[21]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  Impact assessment for a sustainable energy future—Reflections and practical experiences , 2011 .

[22]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[23]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The personal CO2 calculator: A modeling tool for Participatory Integrated Assessment methods , 1999 .

[24]  T. Lopez Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia 1 , 2001 .

[25]  Emmy Bergsma,et al.  Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[26]  T. Waas,et al.  Developing an Environmental Sustainability Toolkit to Integrate Climate Change Issues in Development Cooperation , 2012 .

[27]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[28]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[29]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[30]  Sofia Frantzi,et al.  Exploring discourses on international environmental regime effectiveness with Q methodology: a case study of the Mediterranean Action Plan. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes , 2008 .

[32]  Dirk-Jan F. Kamann,et al.  Organizational design in public procurement: A stakeholder approach , 2007 .

[33]  Y. Fassin,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Tweekerkenstraat 2 B-9000 Gent the Stakeholder Model Refined , 2022 .

[34]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[35]  K. Goodpaster Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis , 1991, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[36]  John M. Bryson,et al.  What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: The Case of Problem Formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota , 2002 .

[37]  Thanakvaro Thyl De Lopez Stakeholder Management for Conservation Projects: A Case Study of Ream National Park, Cambodia1 , 2001, Environmental management.

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  From substantive to procedural rationality , 1976 .

[39]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  T. Webler,et al.  Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective , 1995 .

[41]  F. Rajé,et al.  Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion , 2007 .

[42]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Computer models as social learning tools in participatory integrated assessment , 2011 .

[43]  David Ockwell,et al.  ‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia , 2008 .

[44]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  Learning from Doing Participatory Rural Research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park , 2006, Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[45]  Jennifer Narayan Deepa Rietbergen-McCracken,et al.  Participation and Social Assessment: Tools and Techniques , 1998 .

[46]  Urs Wiesmann,et al.  Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali , 2007 .

[47]  A. M. Freeman Depletable externalities and pigouvian taxation , 1984 .

[48]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[49]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Reconstructive Democratic Theory , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[50]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Life on the Edge: Vulnerability and Adaptation of African Ecosystems to Global Climate Change , 2003 .

[51]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean , 2007 .

[52]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[53]  Nicole Rijkens-Klomp,et al.  A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective , 2002 .

[54]  Emerson Wagner Mainardes,et al.  A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships , 2012 .

[55]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[56]  D. Decker,et al.  Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[57]  E. Garmendia,et al.  Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe , 2010 .

[58]  J. Rotmans Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[59]  John Barry,et al.  Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology , 1999 .

[60]  Heather McGray,et al.  Weathering the Storm: Options for Framing Adaptation and Development , 2007 .

[61]  Timothy W. Nix,et al.  Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[62]  M. Hildén The evolution of climate policies – the role of learning and evaluations , 2011 .

[63]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Rich pictures: a means to explore the ‘sustainable mind’? , 2013 .

[64]  J. Waaub,et al.  Conceptualizing the effectiveness of sustainability assessment in development cooperation , 2015 .

[65]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[66]  Bernd Siebenhüner,et al.  The role of computer modelling in participatory integrated assessments , 2005 .

[67]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins , 2007 .

[68]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[69]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[70]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Participatory methods of integrated assessment—a review , 2010 .

[71]  David Clutterbuck,et al.  Communication with stakeholders: An integrated approach , 1998 .

[72]  Heli Saarikoski,et al.  Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process , 2000 .