On Tracking Realistic Targets in a Megacity with Contested Domain Access

An increasing emphasis of the US Army lies in supporting efficient operation in contested environments, where access to air (e.g., aerial surveillance and pictures) and access to the spectrum (e.g., wireless communication) are highly reduced or denied. A data fusion system, called Athena, was recently developed to optimize information collection for decision making in this context [1]. In this paper, we discuss the use of Athena to track realistic targets on city blocks using deployed security cameras. The work has two objectives: (i) investigate the efficacy of monitoring with sensors available in a city environment (e.g., security cameras, as opposed to, say, aerial imagery), and (ii) minimize communication needs among sensors to better handle bandwidth limitations. 284 vehicle trajectories were collected by inspecting USC campus security cameras to emulate realistic targets. Predictors were trained to anticipate future locations of targets based on past observations. We evaluate the efficacy of such predictors regarding tracking accuracy versus resource savings (e.g., size of footage collected for tracking).

[1]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Athena: Towards Decision-Centric Anticipatory Sensor Information Delivery , 2018, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[2]  Sania Bhatti,et al.  Survey of Target Tracking Protocols Using Wireless Sensor Network , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications.

[3]  Mohamed Hamdi,et al.  Voronoi-Based Sensor Network Engineering for Target Tracking Using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 New Technologies, Mobility and Security.

[4]  H. T. Kung,et al.  Efficient location tracking using sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[5]  Ali Farhadi,et al.  You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  Biplab Sikdar,et al.  A protocol for tracking mobile targets using sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[7]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor deployment and target localization in distributed sensor networks , 2004, TECS.

[8]  Wang-Chien Lee,et al.  Prediction-based strategies for energy saving in object tracking sensor networks , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management, 2004. Proceedings. 2004.

[9]  Khalid A. Darabkh,et al.  Performance evaluation of selective and adaptive heads clustering algorithms over wireless sensor networks , 2012, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[10]  Wang-Chien Lee,et al.  On localized prediction for power efficient object tracking in sensor networks , 2003, 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Tzung-Shi Chen,et al.  Mobile object tracking in wireless sensor networks , 2007, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Ram M. Narayanan,et al.  Trilateration-Based Localization Algorithm Using the Lemoine Point Formulation , 2014 .

[13]  Lui Sha,et al.  Dynamic clustering for acoustic target tracking in wireless sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Kestrel: Video Analytics for Augmented Multi-Camera Vehicle Tracking , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM Third International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI).

[15]  Torsten Braun,et al.  Distributed Event Localization and Tracking with Wireless Sensors , 2007, WWIC.

[16]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  VE-mobicast: a variant-egg-based mobicast routing protocol for sensornets , 2008, Wirel. Networks.

[17]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  HVE-mobicast: a hierarchical-variant-egg-based mobicast routing protocol for wireless sensornets , 2006, WCNC.