In vitro evaluation of Lactobacillus plantarum as direct-fed microbials in high-producing dairy cows diets

Abstract The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the effects of live yeast (LY), yeast fermentation product (YFP), a mix of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (MLP), and Lactobacillus plantarum included as additives in dairy cows’ diets on in vitro ruminal fermentation and gas production (GP); and 2) to evaluate the effects of L. plantarum as direct-fed microbials (DFM) in dairy cows’ diets on in vitro ruminal fermentation, GP, nutrient digestibility, and N metabolism. Three experiments were carried out: Exp. 1 had the objective to compare all additives regarding ruminal fermentation parameters: an Ankom GP system was used in a completely randomized design, consisting of four 48 h incubations, and eight replications per treatment. There were eight treatments: a basal diet without additive (CTRL) or with one of the following additives: LY, YFP, MLP, or L. plantarum at four levels (% of diet Dry Matter (DM)): 0.05% (L1), 0.10% (L2), 0.15% (L3), and 0.20% (L4). In Exp. 2, a batch culture was used to evaluate ruminal fermentation, and CO2 and CH4 production using the same treatments and a similar experimental design, except for having 16 replications per treatment. Based on Exp. 1 and 2 results, Exp. 3 aimed at evaluating the effects of the L. plantarum on ruminal true nutrient digestibility and N utilization in order to evaluate the use of L. plantarum as DFM. The treatments CTRL, MLP, L1, and L2 were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design using a dual-flow continuous culture system. Data were analyzed using linear and nonlinear regression; treatment means were compared through contrasts, and L treatments in Exp. 1 and 2 were tested for linear, quadratic, and cubic effects. In Exp. 1, all treatments containing additives tended to reduce OM digestibility as well as reduced total volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentration and total GP. The YFP had greater OM digestibility than LY, and MLP treatment had greater total VFA concentration compared to L. plantarum treatments. In Exp. 2, additives reduced CO2 production, and there were no major differences in CH4. In Exp. 3, all additives reduced NH3-N concentration. In conclusion, pH and lactate concentration were not affected in all three experiments regardless of additive tested, suggesting that these additives may not improve ruminal fermentation by pH modulation; and L. plantarum may improve ruminal N metabolism when used as DFM in high-producing dairy cows’ diets, mainly by reducing NH3-N concentration.

[1]  R. Muck,et al.  Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  C. Staley,et al.  Comparisons of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen and a dual-flow continuous culture fermentation system using amplicon sequencing. , 2018, Journal of animal science.

[3]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effects of replacing soybean meal with canola meal differing in rumen-undegradable protein content on ruminal fermentation and gas production kinetics using 2 in vitro systems. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  C. Martin,et al.  Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal characteristics, methane emission, and milk fatty acid composition in cows fed high- or low-starch diets. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  T. Carpenter,et al.  Invited review: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of mortality and culling in dairy cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  P. H. Robinson,et al.  Effects of two yeast based direct fed microbials on performance of high producing dairy cows , 2016 .

[7]  T. Shenkoru,et al.  Effects of flaxseed and chia seed on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and long-chain fatty acid flow in a dual-flow continuous culture system. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[8]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production , 2016 .

[9]  T. Shenkoru,et al.  Effects of Partial Replacement of Corn with Glycerin on Ruminal Fermentation in a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  M. Hall Determination of dietary starch in animal feeds and pet food by an enzymatic-colorimetric method: collaborative study. , 2015, Journal of AOAC International.

[11]  Jorge Alberto Elizondo-Salazar,et al.  Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche. , 2014 .

[12]  A. Senda,et al.  The impact of Lactobacillus plantarum TUA1490L supernatant on in vitro rumen methanogenesis and fermentation. , 2013, Anaerobe.

[13]  G. Broderick,et al.  Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield , 2013 .

[14]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Metabolizable energy content of feeds based on 24 or 48 h in situ NDF digestibility and on in vitro 24 h gas production methods , 2011 .

[15]  J. Bernard,et al.  Effects of the addition of direct-fed microbials and glycerol to the diet of lactating dairy cows on milk yield and apparent efficiency of yield. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  K. Stanford,et al.  Review: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle , 2011, Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

[17]  N. HristovA.,et al.  Review: Ammonia emissions from dairy farms and beef feedlots1 , 2011 .

[18]  P. Silver,et al.  Engineering Cyanobacteria To Synthesize and Export Hydrophilic Products , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  G. Broderick,et al.  Estimation of rumen outflow in dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets by use of reticular sampling as an alternative to sampling from the omasal canal. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  B. Corl,et al.  Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on ruminal fermentation and nutrient utilization in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  G. Bertin,et al.  Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  L. Erasmus,et al.  Effects of analyzable diet components on responses of lactating dairy cows to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based yeast products : a systematic review of the literature , 2009 .

[23]  R. Muck,et al.  Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: in vitro gas and volatile fatty acid production. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  J. Linn,et al.  Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  C. Krehbiel,et al.  Chapter 7 Enzymes, bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast: principles for use in ruminant nutrition , 2006 .

[26]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effect of dietary level of rumen-degraded protein on production and nitrogen metabolism in lactating dairy cows. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  A. Halasz,et al.  Influence of Growth Medium on Hydrogen Peroxide and Bacteriocin Production of Lactobacillus Strains , 2005 .

[28]  G. Ghorbani,et al.  Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[29]  P. Weimer,et al.  The survival of silage inoculant lactic acid bacteria in rumen fluid , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[30]  W. Brand,et al.  ConFlo III – an interface for high precision δ13C and δ15N analysis with an extended dynamic range , 1999 .

[31]  J. Jouany,et al.  Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  S. Calsamiglia,et al.  Comparison of nitrogen-15 and purines as microbial markers in continuous culture. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[33]  Richard E. Muck,et al.  Storage Temperature Effects on Proteolysis in Alfalfa Silage , 1988 .

[34]  Kh Menke,et al.  Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid , 1988 .

[35]  G. Broderick,et al.  Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  B. Crooker,et al.  Effects of Differential Solid-Liquid Removal Rates on Protozoa Numbers in Continous Cultures of Rumen Contents , 1976 .

[37]  R. Weller,et al.  Passage of protozoa and volatile fatty acids from the rumen of the sheep and from a continuous in vitro fermentation system , 1974, British Journal of Nutrition.

[38]  J. S. Lee,et al.  INHIBITION OF PSEUDOMONAS SPECIES BY HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PRODUCING LACTOBACILLI1 , 1970 .

[39]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  Biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids from branched-chain fatty acids by rumen bacteria. , 1963, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[40]  J. Clegg,et al.  Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles : Collaborative Study , 2022 .