Pixel-based approach to assess contrast-enhanced ultrasound kinetics parameters for differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are the leading causes of disability and constitute a frequent medical disorder, leading to inability to work, high comorbidity, and increased mortality. The standard for diagnosing and differentiating arthritis is based on clinical examination, laboratory exams, and imaging findings, such as synovitis, bone edema, or joint erosions. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination of the small joints is emerging as a sensitive tool for assessing vascularization and disease activity. Quantitative assessment is mostly performed at the region of interest level, where the mean intensity curve is fitted with an exponential function. We showed that using a more physiologically motivated perfusion curve, and by estimating the kinetic parameters separately pixel by pixel, the quantitative information gathered is able to more effectively characterize the different perfusion patterns. In particular, we demonstrated that a random forest classifier based on pixelwise quantification of the kinetic contrast agent perfusion features can discriminate rheumatoid arthritis from different arthritis forms (psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and arthritis in connective tissue disease) with an average accuracy of 97%. On the contrary, clinical evaluation (DAS28), semiquantitative CEUS assessment, serological markers, or region-based parameters do not allow such a high diagnostic accuracy.

[1]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[2]  Nicholas Bellamy,et al.  Connective Tissue Diseases , 1985 .

[3]  G. Hughes,et al.  Connective Tissue Diseases , 1977 .

[4]  G Evison,et al.  Psoriatic arthritis: outcome of disease subsets and relationship of joint disease to nail and skin disease. , 1994, British journal of rheumatology.

[5]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Yali Amit,et al.  Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees , 1997, Neural Computation.

[7]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Quantification of synovistis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  P. Emery,et al.  Distinct vascular patterns of early synovitis in psoriatic, reactive, and rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  S. Hirohata,et al.  Angioneogenesis as a possible elusive triggering factor in rheumatoid arthritis , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  C Rigon,et al.  Vascular changes in psoriatic knee joint synovitis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3. , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v&bgr;3 , 2003 .

[13]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[14]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[15]  Klaus Bohndorf,et al.  Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group , 2005, European Radiology.

[16]  Enzo Silvestri,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance of the wrist in psoriatic arthritis reveals imaging patterns similar to those of rheumatoid arthritis , 2005, Arthritis research & therapy.

[17]  Dafna Gladman,et al.  Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  C. Helmick,et al.  Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  A. Bjørnerud,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of finger joints in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis based on pharmacokinetic modeling , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[20]  P. Brooks The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective , 2006, Clinical Rheumatology.

[21]  J. Cañete,et al.  Synovial vascular patterns and angiogenic factors expression in synovial tissue and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[22]  Michael Schirmer,et al.  Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2022 .

[23]  Ewart Carson,et al.  Introduction to modeling in physiology and medicine , 2007 .

[24]  G R Burmester,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis. Efficacy of a new method of contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography in detection of synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  Timo Liimatainen,et al.  High-resolution ultrasound perfusion imaging of therapeutic angiogenesis. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[26]  Claudia Schueller-Weidekamm,et al.  Quantification of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: do we really need quantitative measurement of contrast-enhanced ultrasound? , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[27]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Motion corrected cadence CPS ultrasound for quantifying response to vasoactive drugs in a rat kidney model. , 2009, Urology.

[28]  Enrico Grisan,et al.  Toward Early Detection and Differentiation of Arthritic diseases: Quantification of Haemodynamics Changes in Small Joints , 2009 .

[29]  A. Radjenovic,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of metacarpophalangeal joint disease in early psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis , 2009, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[30]  A. Silman,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative Aletaha, , 2010 .

[31]  Maurizio Cutolo,et al.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[32]  A. Silman,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis classifi cation criteria : an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative , 2010 .

[33]  Ming Yu,et al.  Clinical Application of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Superficial Lymphadenopathy , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[34]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Indicator dilution models for the quantification of microvascular blood flow with bolus administration of ultrasound contrast agents , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  Ernest Choy,et al.  Therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis: the interleukin-6 receptor , 2009, Rheumatology.

[36]  M Arditi,et al.  Parametric imaging for characterizing focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  W Jaschke,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of joint vascularity in arthritis--subjective grading versus computer-aided objective quantification. , 2011, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[38]  M. Dougados,et al.  The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[39]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Interactive visual analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound data based on small neighborhood statistics , 2011, Comput. Graph..

[40]  Bernd Raffeiner,et al.  Evaluation of finger joint synovial vascularity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound with water immersion and a stabilized probe , 2012, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[41]  Hui Zhong,et al.  Parametric perfusion imaging using contrast enhanced ultrasound with bolus administration of contrast agents , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[42]  Aurore Bleuzen,et al.  Non-invasive quantification of tumor vascular architecture during docetaxel-chemotherapy , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[43]  C. Tıkız,et al.  Comparison of OMERACT-RAMRIS scores and computer-aided dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings of hand and wrist as a measure of activity in rheumatoid arthritis , 2013, Rheumatology International.

[44]  Christopher V. Barback,et al.  Automating tumor classification with pixel-by-pixel contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion kinetics. , 2012, Journal of vacuum science and technology. B, Nanotechnology & microelectronics : materials, processing, measurement, & phenomena : JVST B.

[45]  Jolanda J Luime,et al.  Role of ultrasonography in diagnosing early rheumatoid arthritis and remission of rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review of the literature , 2013, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[46]  L. Murphy,et al.  Social Participation Restriction Among US Adults With Arthritis: A Population‐Based Study Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2013, Arthritis care & research.

[47]  L. Johansson,et al.  Identification of vascularised carotid plaques using a standardised and reproducible technique to measure ultrasound contrast uptake. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[48]  Dimitrios Makris,et al.  Automatic Identification and Localisation of Potential Malignancies in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Scans Using Spatio-Temporal Features , 2014, ABDI@MICCAI.

[49]  Susanne Winter,et al.  Brain tumor classification on intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[50]  Gaia Rizzo,et al.  Data-Driven Learning to Detect Characteristic Kinetics in Ultrasound Images of Arthritis , 2014, CLIP@MICCAI.

[51]  G. Rizzo,et al.  A comparison of region-based and pixel-based CEUS kinetics parameters in the assessment of arthritis , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[52]  Gaia Rizzo,et al.  Dynamic automated synovial imaging (DASI) for differential diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[53]  S. Bombardieri,et al.  The diagnosis and classification of undifferentiated connective tissue diseases. , 2014, Journal of autoimmunity.

[54]  Alessandra Bertoldo,et al.  Improved Models for Plasma Radiometabolite Correction and their Impact on Kinetic Quantification in PET Studies , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[55]  Enrico Grisan,et al.  Vascular perfusion kinetics by contrast-enhanced ultrasound are related to synovial microvascularity in the joints of psoriatic arthritis , 2015, Clinical Rheumatology.

[56]  Ilias Gatos,et al.  A new automated quantification algorithm for the detection and evaluation of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2015, Medical physics.