Describing the macroscopic world: Closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program

With reference to recently proposed theoretical models accounting for reduction in terms of a unified dynamics governing all physical processes, we analyze the problem of working out a worldview accommodating our knowledge about natural phenomena. We stress the relevant conceptual differences between the considered models and standard quantum mechanics. In spite of the fact that both theories describe systems within a genuine Hilbert space framework, the peculiar features of the spontaneous reduction models limit drastically the states which are dynamically stable. This fact by itself allows one to work out an interpretation of the formalism which makes it possible to give a satisfactory description of the world in terms of the values taken by an appropriately defined mass density function in ordinary configuration space. A topology based on this function and which is radically different from the one characterizing the Hilbert space is introduced, and in terms of it the idea of similarity of macroscopic situations is precisely defined. Finally, the formalism and the interpretation are shown to yield a natural criterion for establishing the psychophysical parallelism. The conclusion is that, within the considered theories and at the nonrelativistic level, one can satisfy all sensible requirements for a completely satisfactory macro-objective description of reality.

[1]  F. Károlyházy,et al.  Gravitation and quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects , 1966 .

[2]  Anthony J Leggett,et al.  Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement (Progress in Statistical and Solid State Physics--In Commemoration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ryogo Kubo) -- (Statistical Physics) , 1980 .

[3]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  Quantum mechanics with spontaneous localization and the quantum theory of measurement , 1986 .

[4]  A. Raczyński,et al.  Symposium on the foundations of modern physics : edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore 1985 , 1986 .

[5]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[6]  L. Vaidman,et al.  On a proposed postulate of state-reduction , 1989 .

[7]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory Reflections on Bell's Theorem , 1989 .

[8]  Pearle,et al.  Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[9]  C. Kilmister Schrodinger: Centenary Celebration of a Polymath , 1989 .

[10]  Arthur I. Miller Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty , 1990 .

[11]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Relativistic dynamical reduction models: General framework and examples , 1990 .

[12]  Grassi,et al.  Continuous-spontaneous-reduction model involving gravity. , 1989, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[13]  Dynamical models for state-vector reduction: do they ensure that measurements have outcomes? , 1991 .

[14]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction , 1993 .