The effect of latitude on the performance of different solar trackers in Europe and Africa

In this paper, the effect of latitude on the performance of different solar trackers is examined. The hourly solar radiation data of different locations around Europe and Africa measured on a horizontal surface is collected and utilized. Widely validated Perez anisotropic model is used to predict the diffuse component of the solar radiation on an inclined surface. Different solar trackers namely, Full/dual-axis, East–West (EW), North–South (NS), Inclined East–West (IEW), and Vertical-axis (V) trackers are considered in calculating the available solar potential of the locations. The performance of the solar trackers in terms of the energy gain is ranked according to the area location latitudes. The results show that the tracking performance is highly dependent on the locations, thus changes with the latitude. The percentage variation among the implemented one-axis tracking options relative to dual-axis trackers ranges from 0.42% to 23.4%. Overall, the increase in the energy gain of dual-axis trackers compared to the optimal fixed panel for the locations varies from 17.72% to 31.23%, thus emphasizes the importance of solar trackers. Finally, the study is expected to aid designers in the selection and installation of appropriate solar trackers in the regions.

[1]  W. Beckman,et al.  Evaluation of hourly tilted surface radiation models , 1990 .

[2]  Salah Abdallah,et al.  Sun tracking system for productivity enhancement of solar still , 2008 .

[3]  Hamdy A. Kandil,et al.  Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels in hot and cold regions , 2016 .

[4]  Ali Al-Mohamad,et al.  Efficiency improvements of photo-voltaic panels using a Sun-tracking system , 2004 .

[5]  J. Tester,et al.  Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options , 2005 .

[6]  Mazen M. Abu-Khader,et al.  Evaluating multi-axes sun-tracking system at different modes of operation in Jordan , 2008 .

[7]  Jun Wu,et al.  Design and Dynamics of a Novel Solar Tracker With Parallel Mechanism , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[8]  J. Michalsky,et al.  Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance , 1990 .

[9]  P. E. Russell,et al.  Evaluation of power output for fixed and step tracking photovoltaic arrays , 1986 .

[10]  S. Nann,et al.  Potentials for tracking photovoltaic systems and V-troughs in moderate climates , 1990 .

[11]  N. H. Helwa,et al.  Maximum Collectable Solar Energy by Different Solar Tracking Systems , 2000 .

[12]  A. Zemel,et al.  Validation of models for global irradiance on inclined planes , 1992 .

[13]  Fernando Cruz-Peragón,et al.  An approach to evaluate the energy advantage of two axes solar tracking systems in Spain , 2011 .

[14]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Parabolic trough collector system for low temperature steam generation: Design and performance characteristics , 1996 .

[15]  Salah Abdallah.  The effect of using sun tracking systems on the voltage–current characteristics and power generation of flat plate photovoltaics , 2004 .

[16]  Tian Pau Chang,et al.  Performance study on the east–west oriented single-axis tracked panel , 2009 .

[17]  W. C. Dickinson.  Annual available radiation for fixed and tracking collectors , 1978 .

[18]  C. A. Coombes,et al.  Performance validation of the Perez tilted surface irradiance model , 1989 .

[19]  Farzad Jafarkazemi,et al.  Optimum tilt angle and orientation of solar surfaces in Abu Dhabi, UAE , 2013 .

[20]  Christian A. Gueymard,et al.  Comments on Evaluation of Models for Estimating Solar Irradiation on Vertical Surfaces at Valencia, Spain , 1992 .

[21]  Runsheng Tang,et al.  Optical performance of inclined southnorth axis three-positions tracked solar panels , 2011 .

[22]  M. T. Oladiran.  Total solar radiation received at various collector inclinations , 1994 .

[23]  Samy A. Khalil,et al.  Performance of Statistical Comparison Models of Solar Energy on Horizontal and Inclined Surface , 2013 .

[24]  Bin-Juine Huang,et al.  Feasibility study of one axis three positions tracking solar PV with low concentration ratio reflector , 2007 .

[25]  E. Vartiainen,et al.  A new approach to estimating the diffuse irradiance on inclined surfaces , 2000 .

[26]  Hui Shen,et al.  Calculation of the hourly and daily radiation incident on three step tracking planes , 2003 .

[27]  Richard Perez,et al.  An anisotropic hourly diffuse radiation model for sloping surfaces: Description, performance validation, site dependency evaluation , 1986 .

[28]  Mostafa Mehrtash,et al.  Tracking strategy for photovoltaic solar systems in high latitudes , 2015 .

[29]  Mariacristina Roscia,et al.  Comparative analysis of fixed and sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption , 2015 .

[30]  Salem Nijmeh,et al.  Two axes sun tracking system with PLC control , 2004 .

[31]  Runsheng Tang,et al.  Optical performance of vertical single-axis tracked solar panels , 2011 .

[32]  Farshad Farshchi Tabrizi,et al.  Optimization of solar flat collector inclination , 2011 .

[33]  G. Kamali,et al.  Evaluation of 12 models to estimate hourly diffuse irradiation on inclined surfaces , 2008 .

[34]  R. Tang,et al.  Optimal tilt-angles for solar collectors used in China , 2004 .

[35]  Binbin Zhang,et al.  Optimum design and performance comparison of a redundantly actuated solar tracker and its nonredundant counterpart , 2016 .

[36]  Tian Pau Chang,et al.  The gain of single-axis tracked panel according to extraterrestrial radiation , 2009 .

[37]  Derek K. Baker,et al.  Solar energy potentials in strategically located cities in Nigeria: Review, resource assessment and PV system design , 2016 .

[38]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Evaluation of slope irradiance and illuminance models against measured Hong Kong data , 2000 .

[39]  M. Kacira,et al.  Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey , 2004 .

[40]  H. Manz,et al.  Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation , 2007 .

[41]  Taher S. Maatallah,et al.  Performance modeling and investigation of fixed, single and dual-axis tracking photovoltaic panel in Monastir city, Tunisia , 2011 .

[42]  P. Ineichen,et al.  A new simplified version of the perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces , 1987 .

[43]  Cemil Sungur,et al.  Multi-axes sun-tracking system with PLC control for photovoltaic panels in Turkey , 2009 .

[44]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  A new approach for predicting vertical global solar irradiance , 2002 .

[45]  A. A. El-Sebaii,et al.  Global, direct and diffuse solar radiation on horizontal and tilted surfaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[46]  T. Chang.  Output energy of a photovoltaic module mounted on a single-axis tracking system , 2009 .

[47]  Himangshu Ranjan Ghosh,et al.  Determining seasonal optimum tilt angles, solar radiations on variously oriented, single and double axis tracking surfaces at Dhaka , 2010 .

[48]  Samy A. Khalil,et al.  A comparative study of total, direct and diffuse solar irradiance by using different models on horizontal and inclined surfaces for Cairo, Egypt , 2013 .

[49]  Hamdy K. Elminir,et al.  Optimum solar flat-plate collector slope: Case study for Helwan, Egypt , 2006 .

[50]  Richard C. Neville,et al.  Solar energy collector orientation and tracking mode , 1978 .

[51]  Mustapha Koussa,et al.  Measured and modelled improvement in solar energy yield from flat plate photovoltaic systems utilizing different tracking systems and under a range of environmental conditions , 2011 .

[52]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[53]  M. P. Utrillas,et al.  Evaluation of models for estimating solar irradiation on vertical surfaces at Valencia, Spain , 1991 .

[54]  C. Gueymard.  An anisotropic solar irradiance model for tilted surfaces and its comparison with selected engineering algorithms , 1987 .

[55]  Saifur Rahman,et al.  Comparative assessment of plane-of-array irradiance models , 1987 .

[56]  R. Tang,et al.  Optical performance of inclined south-north single-axis tracked solar panels , 2010 .

[57]  Runsheng Tang,et al.  Optical performance of vertical axis three azimuth angles tracked solar panels , 2011 .

[58]  M. Benghanem.  Optimization of tilt angle for solar panel: Case study for Madinah, Saudi Arabia , 2011 .

[59]  J. Kleissl,et al.  Optimum fixed orientations and benefits of tracking for capturing solar radiation in the continental United States , 2011 .

[60]  Naum Fraidenraich,et al.  Comparison of the performance of PV water pumping systems driven by fixed, tracking and V-trough generators , 2004 .

[61]  William David Lubitz,et al.  Effect of manual tilt adjustments on incident irradiance on fixed and tracking solar panels , 2011 .

[62]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Evaluation of Different Radiation and Albedo Models for the Prediction of Solar Radiation Incident on Tilted Surfaces, for Four European Locations , 1996 .

[63]  Mehmet Cebeci,et al.  Evaluation of power output for fixed and two-axis tracking PVarrays , 2012 .

[64]  Gang Yang,et al.  A multipurpose dual-axis solar tracker with two tracking strategies , 2014 .

[65]  Alessandro Cammarata.  Optimized design of a large-workspace 2-DOF parallel robot for solar tracking systems , 2015 .