Detecting psychosocial problems among 5-6-year-old children in preventive Child Health Care: the validity of a short questionnaire used in an assessment procedure for detecting psychosocial problems among children.

BACKGROUND An extended re-assessment of the psychometric properties of the LSPPK, an instrument aimed at identifying children with emotional and behavioural problems. METHODS Data came from a national sample in The Netherlands of parents of 1248 children (aged 5-6 years) interviewed by child health professionals (CHP). Data were obtained regarding psychosocial problems, treatment status and scores on the LSPPK (Parent and CHP Index), and on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The scale structure, reliability, criterion and content validity and added value of the LSPPK were assessed using the CBCL and treatment status as criteria. RESULTS The scale structure corresponded with that found originally; the LSPPK improved the prediction of problems according to the CBCL, compared to predictions using readily available risk indicators alone. Reliability varied between 0.55 and 0.69. For the LSPPK Parent Index, sensitivity varied between 0.42 and 0.50. For the CHP Index sensitivity varied between 0.60 and 0.96, but specificity varied between 0.76 and 0.79. Both indices were very sensitive for attention and social problems, but less so for other problems. CONCLUSION The LSPPK Parent Index cannot distinguish sufficiently between children with or without serious problems. Either too many children with problems remain unnoticed or too many children without problems are labelled as a case. The LSPPK CHP Index, reflecting the CHP's interpretation of the Parent Index after interviewing the parents does not compensate adequately for the weaknesses of the Parent Index. Better assessment procedures and strategies need to be developed.

[1]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Identification and management of psychosocial problems by preventive child health care. , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[2]  H. Meltzer,et al.  Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. , 2000, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[3]  C. Bouchier,et al.  Improving prevention in Dutch child health care in schoolsDevelopment of a short questionnaire for early detection of psychosocial and related child rearing problems , 1999 .

[4]  J. Durlak,et al.  Evaluation of Indicated Preventive Intervention (Secondary Prevention) Mental Health Programs for Children and Adolescents , 1998, American journal of community psychology.

[5]  P. Szatmari,et al.  Adequacy of interviews vs checklists for classifying childhood psychiatric disorder based on parent reports. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[6]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Factors associated with child mental health service use in the community. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[8]  F. Verhulst,et al.  The Eight-Year Stability of Problem Behavior in an Epidemiologic Sample , 1995, Pediatric Research.

[9]  F. Glascoe,et al.  The role of parents in the detection of developmental and behavioral problems. , 1995, Pediatrics.

[10]  F. Verhulst,et al.  Continuity and change of self-reported problem behaviors from adolescence into young adulthood. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[11]  T. Achenbach Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile , 1991 .

[12]  E. Costello Child psychiatric disorders and their correlates: a primary care pediatric sample. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[13]  F. Glascoe Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem? , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[14]  R. Hirasing,et al.  Child health in the Netherlands : facts and figures 1997 , 1997 .