Political Connections, Auditor Choice and Corporate Accounting Transparency: Evidence from Private Sector Firms in China

This article investigates the way in which political connections impact auditor choice. Using a political connection index constructed based on the bureaucratic ranks of executive managers and board members in Chinese private sector firms, we find that for firms with weak political connections, the likelihood of hiring high†quality auditors increases with the degree of political connectedness, while it decreases with political connectedness for firms with strong political connections. This inverse U†shaped relationship is particularly pronounced for firms with ownership structures that intensify agency problems. Finally, we find that political connections and accounting transparency also have an inverse U†shaped relationship.

[1]  Zhifeng Yang Do Political Connections Add Value to Audit Firms? Evidence from IPO Audits in China , 2011 .

[2]  B. Wang,et al.  Auditor choice and accruals patterns of cross-listed firms , 2014 .

[3]  Randall Morck,et al.  Concentrated Corporate Ownership , 2000 .

[4]  Meijun Qian,et al.  Expropriation of Minority Shareholders in Politically Connected Firms , 2010 .

[5]  Paul Chaney,et al.  The Quality of Accounting Information in Politically Connected Firms , 2010 .

[6]  R. Fisman Estimating the Value of Political Connections , 2001 .

[7]  Chung-Hua Shen,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Protection, and Earnings Management: Some International Evidence , 2008 .

[8]  Zengquan Li,et al.  Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence , 2011 .

[9]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia , 2001 .

[10]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms , 2015, Journal of Accounting Research.

[11]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[12]  R. Kalra,et al.  Earnings Management and Investor Protection: An International Comparison , 2004 .

[13]  Rebel A. Cole,et al.  Political Connections and Minority-Shareholder Protection: Evidence from Securities-Market Regulation in China , 2009, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[14]  Yi Lu Political Connections and Trade Expansion , 2011 .

[15]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Principal‐principal conflicts under weak institutions: A study of corporate takeovers in China , 2013 .

[16]  Hazem Daouk,et al.  The World Price of Earnings Opacity , 2002 .

[17]  Marco Pagano,et al.  The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring, and the Decision to Go Public , 1998 .

[18]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Transparency in Politically Connected Firms: Evidence from Private Sector Firms in China , 2011 .

[20]  Omrane Guedhami,et al.  Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms , 2013 .

[21]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  Corporate finance and governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research , 2011 .

[22]  Randall Morck,et al.  Inherited Wealth, Corporate Control and Economic Growth: the Canadian Disease , 1998 .

[23]  Xing-qiang Du,et al.  Do Politically Connected Independent Directors Help Chinese Listed Private Firms Enter High-Barrier Industries?1 , 2014 .

[24]  T. Wong,et al.  State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China , 2008 .

[25]  O. Guedhami,et al.  Ownership Structure, Agency Problems, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from Western European Firms , 2007 .