Lesson authoring system for creating interactive activities involving virtual humans the thinking head whiteboard

Educators continually strive to provide learning materials that are specifically adapted to their students' unique learning preferences and needs. Software use continues to grow in classrooms however typical educational programs cannot be modified to suit individual learners. The Thinking Head Whiteboard is a lesson authoring tool that provides such a capability, allowing educators without a computer programming background to create their own interactive lessons. The Thinking Head Whiteboard also supports the use of virtual human `tutors' and `peers' within these lessons, making it uniquely suited to assist in areas such as social skills education. Further, the software currently being developed incorporates a basic level of automated assessment, allowing it to adapt on the fly to learner needs, providing repetition of content for struggling learners and fast-tracking those who are proficient. Ultimately, it is hoped that the Thinking Head Whiteboard will become an engaging and useful tool for educators and learners alike.

[1]  M. Silver,et al.  Evaluation of a New Computer Intervention to Teach People with Autism or Asperger Syndrome to Recognize and Predict Emotions in Others , 2001, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[2]  J. Cassell,et al.  Authorable Virtual Peers for Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2006 .

[3]  C. Deruelle,et al.  Typical Emotion Processing for Cartoon but not for Real Faces in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[4]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games , 2002, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  R. Moreno,et al.  Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity , 2006 .

[6]  Francisco Iacobelli,et al.  Ethnic Identity and Engagement in Embodied Conversational Agents , 2007, IVA.

[7]  D. Massaro,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Animated Tutor for Vocabulary and Language Learning in Children with Autism , 2003, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[9]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens: Comparison to Human Tutoring and Classroom Instruction , 2003 .

[10]  K. H. Kreimeyer,et al.  Academic and Social Benefits of a Co-enrollment Model of Inclusive Education for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[11]  Xinming Hu,et al.  Automated Assessment System for Subjective Questions Based on LSI , 2010, 2010 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics.

[12]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Social Skills Interventions for Individuals with Autism: Evaluation for Evidence-Based Practices within a Best Evidence Synthesis Framework , 2010, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[13]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Assessing Cognitively Complex Strategy Use in an Untrained Domain , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[15]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[16]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Automatic Concept Map Scoring Framework Using the Semantic Web Technologies , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[17]  V. Shute,et al.  Adaptive E-Learning , 2003, Educational Psychologist.