The role of gender in team collaboration and performance

Abstract Given that women continue to be underrepresented in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) and that scientific innovations are increasingly produced by team collaborations, we reviewed the existing literature regarding the effects of gender diversity on team processes and performance. Recent evidence strongly suggests that team collaboration is greatly improved by the presence of women in the group, and this effect is primarily explained by benefits to group processes. The evidence concerning the effect of gender diversity on team performance is more equivocal and contingent upon a variety of contextual factors. In light of the importance of collaboration in science, promoting the role of women in the field can have positive practical consequences for science and technology.

[1]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender and Social Influence , 2001 .

[2]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[3]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[4]  George B. Graen,et al.  Effects of Team Gender and Racial Composition on Perceptions of Team Performance in Cross-Functional Teams , 1997 .

[5]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[6]  Catherine Cronin,et al.  Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education , 1999 .

[7]  P. Y. Martin,et al.  Gender Composition, Attributional Accounts, and Women's Influence and Likability in Task Groups , 1990 .

[8]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[9]  M. Dew,et al.  Effects of Gender Diversity on Performance and Interpersonal Behavior in Small Work Groups , 2005 .

[10]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Men, Women, and Leadership Centralization in Groups Over Time. , 2005 .

[11]  L. Snyder,et al.  Diverse Faculty in STEM Fields: Attitudes, Performance, and Fair Treatment , 2009 .

[12]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[13]  C. Keating,et al.  Power Displays Between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study , 1988 .

[14]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[15]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[16]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[17]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[18]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity Among Men and Women , 2004 .

[19]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[20]  C. Sherif,et al.  The effectiveness of men and women in problem-solving groups as a function of group gender composition , 1986 .

[21]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[22]  Cynthia Lee,et al.  Joint Effects of Group Efficacy and Gender Diversity on Group Cohesion and Performance , 2004 .

[23]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[24]  G. Fenwick,et al.  Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance , 2001 .

[25]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[26]  M. Neale,et al.  What Differences Make a Difference? , 2005, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[27]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[28]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  Emily D. Heaphy,et al.  The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams , 2004 .

[30]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[31]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[32]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1996 .

[33]  Gerhard Sonnert,et al.  Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Effects of Faculty, Fields, and Institutions Over Time* , 2007 .

[34]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender and Group Behavior , 2010 .

[35]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key? , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  M. S. Mast.  Gender Differences and Similarities in Dominance Hierarchies in Same-Gender Groups Based on Speaking Time , 2001 .

[37]  Elizabeth A. Corley.  How Do Career Strategies, Gender, and Work Environment Affect Faculty Productivity Levels in University‐Based Science Centers?1 , 2005 .

[38]  J. Blickenstaff.  Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .

[39]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The More, the Better? A Four-Nation Study of the Inclusion of Women in Symphony Orchestras , 1995 .

[40]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .