Capillary refill time during fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis-related hyperlactatemia at the emergency department is related to mortality

Introduction Acute circulatory dysfunction in patients with sepsis can evolve rapidly into a progressive stage associated with high mortality. Early recognition and adequate resuscitation could improve outcome. However, since the spectrum of clinical presentation is quite variable, signs of hypoperfusion are frequently unrecognized in patients just admitted to the emergency department (ED). Hyperlactatemia is considered a key parameter to disclose tissue hypoxia but it is not universally available and getting timely results can be challenging in low resource settings. In addition, non-hypoxic sources can be involved in hyperlactatemia, and a misinterpretation could lead to over-resuscitation in an unknown number of cases. Capillary refill time (CRT) is a marker of peripheral perfusion that worsens during circulatory failure. An abnormal CRT in septic shock patients after ICU-based resuscitation has been associated with poor outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abnormal CRT in patients with sepsis-related hyperlactatemia in the early phase after ED admission, and its relationship with outcome. Methods We performed a prospective observational study. Septic patients with hyperlactemia at ED admission subjected to an initial fluid resuscitation (FR) were included. CRT and other parameters were assessed before and after FR. CRT-normal or CRT-abnormal subgroups were defined according to the status of CRT following initial FR, and major outcomes were registered. Results Ninety-five hyperlactatemic septic patients were included. Thirty-one percent had abnormal CRT at ED arrival. After FR, 87 patients exhibited normal CRT, and 8 an abnormal one. Patients with abnormal CRT had an increased risk of adverse outcomes (88% vs. 20% p<0.001; RR 4.4 [2.7–7.4]), and hospital mortality (63% vs. 9% p<0.001; RR 6.7 [2.9–16]) as compared to those with normal CRT after FR. Specifically, CRT-normal patients required less frequently mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and ICU admission, and exhibited a lower hospital mortality. Conclusions Hyperlactatemic sepsis patients with abnormal CRT after initial fluid resuscitation exhibit higher mortality and worse clinical outcomes than patients with normal CRT.

[1]  H. Champion,et al.  Assessment of injury severity: the Triage Index , 1980, Critical care medicine.

[2]  E. Draper,et al.  APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[3]  J. Levy,et al.  Relationship between clinical evaluation of peripheral perfusion and global hemodynamics in adults after cardiac surgery , 1990, Critical care medicine.

[4]  K. Maitland,et al.  Are bedside features of shock reproducible between different observers? , 2004, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[5]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  J. Bakker,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  J. Bakker,et al.  The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[8]  D. Roland,et al.  Does a standardised scoring system of clinical signs reduce variability between doctors' assessments of the potentially dehydrated child? , 2010, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[9]  P. Böelle,et al.  Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock , 2011, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  L. Folkestad,et al.  Capillary refill time: a study of interobserver reliability among nurses and nurse assistants , 2011, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[11]  J. Bakker,et al.  Circulatory shock: An update A tribute to Professor Max Harry Weil , 2012 .

[12]  E. Kattan,et al.  Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study. , 2012, Journal of critical care.

[13]  R. Castro,et al.  The holistic view on perfusion monitoring in septic shock , 2012, Current opinion in critical care.

[14]  Jukka Takala,et al.  Re-thinking resuscitation: leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approach , 2013, Critical Care.

[15]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock 2012 , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[16]  J. Bakker,et al.  Clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion to predict postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery early: a prospective observational study in adults , 2014, Critical Care.

[17]  R. Robert,et al.  Incidence and impact of skin mottling over the knee and its duration on outcome in critically ill patients , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  P. Böelle,et al.  Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock , 2014, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  Fei Wang,et al.  The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis - earlier is better: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2014, Critical Care.

[20]  Michael Bailey,et al.  Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Richard Beale,et al.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine , 2014, Intensive Care Medicine.

[22]  J. Bakker,et al.  When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring , 2014, Annals of Intensive Care.

[23]  A. Dubin,et al.  Lack of agreement between different observers and methods in the measurement of capillary refill time in healthy volunteers: an observational study , 2014, Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva.

[24]  P. Marik,et al.  Sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia , 2014, Critical Care.

[25]  Amber E Barnato,et al.  A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Mitchell M. Levy,et al.  Lactate Measurements in Sepsis-Induced Tissue Hypoperfusion: Results From the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Database* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[27]  J. Bakker,et al.  Clinical assessment of peripheral circulation , 2015, Current opinion in critical care.

[28]  J. Bakker,et al.  Early peripheral perfusion-guided fluid therapy in patients with septic shock. , 2015, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[29]  J. Bakker Lost in translation: on lactate, hypotension, sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion, quantitative resuscitation and Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles. , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[30]  R. Bellomo,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[31]  F. Holleman,et al.  The Power of Flash Mob Research: Conducting a Nationwide Observational Clinical Study on Capillary Refill Time in a Single Day , 2017, Chest.