Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool

Habitat alteration, in the form of land-use development, is a leading cause of biodiversity loss in the U.S. and elsewhere. Although statutes in the U.S. may require consideration of biodiversity in local land-use planning and regulation, local governments lack the data, resources, and expertise to routinely consider biotic impacts that result from permitted land uses. We hypothesized that decision support systems could aid solution of this problem. We developed a pilot biodiversity expert systems tool (BEST) to test that hypothesis and learn what additional scientific and technological advancements are required for broad implementation of such a system. BEST uses data from the U.S. Geological Survey's Gap Analysis Program (GAP) and other data in a desktop GIS environment. The system provides predictions of conflict between proposed land uses and biotic elements and is intended for use at the start of the development review process. Key challenges were the development of categorization systems that relate named land-use types to ecological impacts, and relate sensitivities of biota to ecological impact levels. Although the advent of GAP and sophisticated desktop GIS make such a system feasible for broad implementation, considerable ongoing research is required to make the results of such a system scientifically sound, informative, and reliable for the regulatory process. We define a role for local government involvement in biodiversity impact assessment, the need for a biodiversity decision support system, the development of a prototype system, and scientific needs for broad implementation of a robust and reliable system.

[1]  Jane M. Packard,et al.  Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild , 1999 .

[2]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Interactions of humans and bald eagles on the Columbia River estuary. , 1991 .

[3]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[4]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[5]  William C. McComb,et al.  IDENTIFYING GAPS IN CONSERVATION NETWORKS: OF INDICATORS AND UNCERTAINTY IN GEOGRAPHIC-BASED ANALYSES , 1997 .

[6]  Lucy Goodison,et al.  In our own hands. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[7]  Frederick Steiner,et al.  The living landscape : an ecological approach to landscape planning , 2000 .

[8]  A. Dan Tarlock,et al.  Local Protection of Biodiversity: What Is Its Niche? , 1993 .

[9]  Jill Grant,et al.  A Framework for Planning Sustainable Residential Landscapes , 1996 .

[10]  Lawrence W. Barnthouse,et al.  Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning , 1986 .

[11]  H L Diamond,et al.  Land Use in America , 1996 .

[12]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[13]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation , 1996, Restoration & Management Notes.

[14]  Peter Arcese,et al.  Why hire a behaviorist into a conservation or management team , 1997 .

[15]  D. Commerce.  Statistical abstract of the United States , 1978 .

[16]  J W Thomas,et al.  Guidelines for maintaining and enhancing wildlife habitat in forest management in the blue mountains of Oregon and Washington. , 1977 .

[17]  J. Treweek,et al.  Ecological Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[18]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[19]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[20]  Ingrid M. Parker,et al.  Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants , 1994 .

[21]  Robert J. Frye,et al.  Demography and Population Viability of an Endangered Plant Species before and after Protection from Trampling , 1997 .

[22]  Mark Cantley.  In our own hands , 2005, Nature.

[23]  C. Krebs.  Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance , 1973 .

[24]  Daniel A. Guthrie,et al.  Suburban Bird Populations in Southern California , 1974 .

[25]  A. Dobson,et al.  Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States , 1997, Science.

[26]  Frederick Steiner.  TOWARD EDEN , 1983, Landscape Journal.

[27]  Robert T. M'Closkey,et al.  Spatial Scale and Determination of Species Status of the Green Frog , 1997 .

[28]  Range Experiment Station,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores , 1994 .

[29]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[30]  W Hamula,et al.  Site planning. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[31]  Daniel F. Doak,et al.  The Role of Local Government in the Conservation of Rare Species , 1996 .

[32]  Paul R. Krausman,et al.  A Review of Wildlife Management , 1986 .

[33]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[34]  John P. Reganold,et al.  A Theoretical Basis for Managing Environmentally Sensitive Areas , 1991, Environmental Conservation.

[35]  John T. Emlen,et al.  An Urban Bird Community in Tucson, Arizona: Derivation, Structure, Regulation , 1974 .

[36]  Steven L. Yaffee,et al.  Why Environmental Policy Nightmares Recur , 1997 .

[37]  I. Mcharg.  Design With Nature , 1969 .

[38]  Kristine M Williams,et al.  LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT PROMOTE ACCESS MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[39]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[40]  Robert B. Olshansky,et al.  The California Environmental Quality Act and Local Planning , 1996 .

[41]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING , 1994 .

[42]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  Using the County General Plan to Guide Habitat Mitigation Under CEQA , 1993 .

[43]  David N. Cole,et al.  Indirect effects of recreation on wildlife , 1995 .

[44]  Catherine R. Berris,et al.  Interactions of Elk and Residential Development: Planning, Design, and Attitudinal Considerations , 1987, Landscape Journal.

[45]  R. Aspinall,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Systems Approach to Design of Spatial Decision Support Systems for Environmental Management , 1998, Environmental management.

[46]  L. Jack Lyon,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores : American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States / , 1994 .

[47]  Robert W. Brocksen,et al.  Soulé's conservation biology as the foundation for econometric ecosystem management , 1996 .

[48]  Lowell W. Adams,et al.  Wildlife Reserves and Corridors in the Urban Environment: A Guide to Ecological Landscape Planning and Resource Conservation , 1989 .

[49]  A. Dan Tarlock,et al.  Local Government Protection of Biodiversity: What Is Its Niche? , 1994 .

[50]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[51]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Wildlife and recreationists: coexistence through management and research , 1997 .