A cost-effective and reliable measurement strategy for 3D printed parts by integrating low- and high-resolution measurement systems

ABSTRACT Metrology data are crucial to quality control of three-dimensional (3D) printed parts. Low-cost measurement systems are often unreliable due to their low resolutions, whereas high-resolution measurement systems usually induce high measurement costs. To balance the measurement cost and accuracy, a new cost-effective and reliable measurement strategy is proposed in this article, which jointly uses two-resolution measurement systems. Specifically, only a small sample of base parts are measured by both the low- and high-resolution measurement systems in order to save costs. The measurement accuracy of most parts with only low-resolution metrology data is improved by effectively integrating high-resolution metrology data of the base parts. A Bayesian generative model parameterizes a part-independent bias and variance pattern of the low-resolution metrology data and facilitates a between-part data integration via an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm. This multi-part two-resolution metrology data integration highlights the novelty and contribution of this article compared with the existing one-part data integration methods in the literature. Finally, an intensive experimental study involving a laser scanner and a machine visual system has validated the effectiveness of our measurement strategy in acquisition of reliable metrology data of 3D printed parts.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  A performance evaluation test for laser line scanners on CMMs , 2007 .

[2]  Yosry Morsi,et al.  Error analysis of FDM fabricated medical replicas , 2010 .

[3]  M. Yuan,et al.  Doubly penalized likelihood estimator in heteroscedastic regression , 2004 .

[4]  Enrique del Castillo,et al.  Geodesic Gaussian Processes for the Parametric Reconstruction of a Free-Form Surface , 2015, Technometrics.

[5]  M. Rioux,et al.  Influence of speckle on laser range finders. , 1991, Applied optics.

[6]  Yu Ding,et al.  Bayesian hierarchical model for combining misaligned two-resolution metrology data , 2011 .

[7]  Jian Wang,et al.  Study of weighted fusion methods for the measurement of surface geometry , 2017 .

[8]  Xiangqian Jiang,et al.  Multisensor data fusion in dimensional metrology , 2009 .

[9]  R. Kohn,et al.  Locally Adaptive Semiparametric Estimation of the Mean and Variance Functions in Regression Models , 2006 .

[10]  Peter Z. G. Qian,et al.  Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy Experiments , 2008, Technometrics.

[11]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Estimation and variable selection in nonparametric heteroscedastic regression , 2003, Stat. Comput..

[12]  Tim Hesterberg,et al.  Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing , 2002, Technometrics.

[13]  Qiang Huang,et al.  In-Plane Shape-Deviation Modeling and Compensation for Fused Deposition Modeling Processes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[14]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  On the use of principal component analysis to identify systematic patterns in roundness profiles , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  Konrad Wegener,et al.  Understanding error generation in fused deposition modeling , 2015 .

[16]  Stefan H. Steiner Statistical Process Control Using Two Measurement Systems , 2000, Technometrics.

[17]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[18]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Statistical Predictive Modeling and Compensation of Geometric Deviations of Three-Dimensional Printed Products , 2014 .

[19]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[20]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[21]  T. K. Kundra,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies , 2018 .

[22]  Chia-Hsiang Menq,et al.  Multiple-sensor integration for rapid and high-precision coordinate metrology , 2000, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[23]  Joachim Vandekerckhove,et al.  Sequential bayesian updating for big data , 2016 .

[24]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[25]  Tirthankar Dasgupta,et al.  Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three-dimensional printing processes , 2015 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Accuracy improvement of laser line scanning for feature measurements on CMM , 2011 .

[27]  Tim Caffrey,et al.  Wohlers report 2013 : additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry : annual worldwide progress report , 2013 .

[28]  Hsi-Yung Feng,et al.  Analysis of digitizing errors of a laser scanning system , 2001 .

[29]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  Multisensor data fusion via Gaussian process models for dimensional and geometric verification , 2015 .