Evolutionary optimization of a geometrically refined truss

Structural optimization is a field of research that has experienced noteworthy growth for many years. Researchers in this area have developed optimization tools to successfully design and model structures, typically minimizing mass while maintaining certain deflection and stress constraints. Numerous optimization studies have been performed to minimize mass, deflection, and stress on a benchmark cantilever truss problem. Predominantly, traditional optimization theory is applied to this problem. The cross-sectional area of each member is optimized to minimize the aforementioned objectives. This paper will present a structural optimization technique that has been previously applied to compliant mechanism design. This technique demonstrates a method that combines topology optimization, geometric refinement, finite element analysis, and two forms of evolutionary computation—genetic algorithms and differential evolution—to successfully optimize a benchmark structural optimization problem. A nontraditional solution to the benchmark problem is presented in this paper, specifically, a geometrically refined topological solution. The design process begins with an alternate control mesh formulation, multilevel geometric smoothing operation, and an elastostatic structural analysis. The design process is wrapped in an evolutionary computing optimization tool set.

[1]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Minimizing the real functions of the ICEC'96 contest by differential evolution , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  J. Petersson,et al.  Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima , 1998 .

[3]  L. A. Schmit,et al.  Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis , 1973 .

[4]  E. Catmull,et al.  Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes , 1978 .

[5]  Patrick V. Hull,et al.  Optimal synthesis of compliant mechanisms using subdivision and commercial FEA , 2006 .

[6]  V. Venkayya.  Design of optimum structures , 1971 .

[7]  H. Miura,et al.  AN ADVANCED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS/SYNTHESIS CAPABILITY - ACCESS , 1976 .

[8]  A. Michell.  LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures , 1904 .

[9]  M. Sabin,et al.  Behaviour of recursive division surfaces near extraordinary points , 1978 .

[10]  Malcolm A. Sabin,et al.  Behaviour of recursive division surfaces near extraordinary points , 1998 .

[11]  L. A. Schmit,et al.  A new structural analysis/synthesis capability - ACCESS , 1975 .

[12]  M. Zhou,et al.  The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization , 1991 .

[13]  Uri Kirsch,et al.  Optimal Topologies of Structures , 1989 .

[14]  Rajat Saxena,et al.  On Honeycomb Parameterization for Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 2003, DAC 2003.

[15]  R. Storn,et al.  On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization , 1996, Proceedings of North American Fuzzy Information Processing.

[16]  Rainer Storn,et al.  System design by constraint adaptation and differential evolution , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  Designing compliant mechanisms , 1995 .

[18]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Optimal design of compliant mechanisms for smart structures applications , 1998, Smart Structures.

[19]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces , 2004 .

[20]  Michael L. Tinker,et al.  Truss Optimization for a Manned Nuclear Electric Space Vehicle Using Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[21]  David B. Fogel,et al.  An Introduction to Evolutionary Computation , 2022 .

[22]  Thomas A. Poulsen.  A simple scheme to prevent checkerboard patterns and one-node connected hinges in topology optimization , 2002 .

[23]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Nonlinear Beam Elements , 2004 .

[24]  J. Arora,et al.  Efficient optimal design of structures by generalized steepest descent programming , 1976 .

[25]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[26]  Hejun Du,et al.  Techniques to suppress intermediate density in topology optimization of compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[27]  A. Saxena.  On Multiple-Material Optimal Compliant Topologies: Discrete Variable Parameterization Using Genetic Algorithm , 2002 .

[28]  C. S. Jog,et al.  Stability of finite element models for distributed-parameter optimization and topology design , 1996 .

[29]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization , 1997 .

[30]  C. S. Jog,et al.  A new approach to variable-topology shape design using a constraint on perimeter , 1996 .

[31]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[32]  Hirokazu Miura,et al.  An advanced structural analysis/synthesis capability—ACCESS 2 , 1978 .

[33]  Thomas A. Poulsen.  A new scheme for imposing a minimum length scale in topology optimization , 2003 .

[34]  George Merrill Chaikin,et al.  An algorithm for high-speed curve generation , 1974, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[35]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology synthesis of large‐displacement compliant mechanisms , 2001 .