Higher education scholars' participation and practices on Twitter

Scholars participate in online social networks for professional purposes. In such networks, learning takes the form of participation and identity formation through engagement in and contribution to networked practices. While current literature describes the possible benefits of online participation, empirical research on scholars' use of online social networks in the educational technology literature is negligible. The purpose of this paper is to understand scholars' naturalistic practices in social networks in general, and on Twitter in particular. Tweets from 45 scholars were analysed qualitatively to arrive at dominant themes describing online social network practice. Findings indicate that scholars participating on Twitter (1) shared information, resources, and media relating to their professional practice; (2) shared information about their classroom and their students; (3) requested assistance from and offered suggestions to others; (4) engaged in social commentary; (5) engaged in digital identity and impression management; (6) sought to network and make connections with others; and (7) highlighted their participation in online networks other than Twitter. These findings assist the field in understanding the emerging practice of scholarly participation in online networks. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Kevin K. Kumashiro,et al.  Thinking Collaboratively about the Peer-Review Process for Journal- Article Publication , 2005 .

[2]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  Fang Wu,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope , 2008, First Monday.

[4]  Libby V. Morris,et al.  Leadership and the Future of Higher Education , 2010 .

[5]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Horton Hears a Tweet. , 2009 .

[6]  K. Arrow.  Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[7]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Students' and teachers' use of Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  A. Giorgi,et al.  The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure , 1997 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  L. Shulman,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments. , 1999 .

[11]  Jon Dron,et al.  How the Crowd Can Teach , 2011 .

[12]  Cesar C. Navarrete,et al.  Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities , 2012 .

[13]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[14]  S. Merriam.  What Can You Tell from an N of 1?: Issues of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[15]  Jill Walker,et al.  Blogging from inside the ivory tower , 2006 .

[16]  Trey Martindale,et al.  Using weblogs in scholarship and teaching , 2004 .

[17]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  Technological Preparedness among Entering Freshmen: The Role of Race, Class, and Gender , 2001 .

[18]  J. Seaman,et al.  Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media. , 2011 .

[19]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  James A. Middleton,et al.  Design Research Perspectives on Transitioning From Individual Microgenetic Interviews to a Whole-Class Teaching Experiment , 2009 .

[22]  Diana G. Oblinger.  From the Campus to the Future. , 2010 .

[23]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  Josh Pasek,et al.  Facebook and Academic Performance: Reconciling a Media Sensation with Data , 2009, First Monday.

[25]  Reynol Junco,et al.  The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Christopher S Peters,et al.  Defining appropriate professional behavior for faculty and university students on social networking websites , 2012 .

[27]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Sara Kjellberg,et al.  I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context , 2010, First Monday.

[30]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Katrina A. Meyer,et al.  Academics Online: Their Interests and Foibles , 2011 .

[33]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[34]  Katrina A. Meyer.  A Study of Online Discourse at The Chronicle of Higher Education , 2010 .

[35]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Blogging in the Classroom: A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes and Impact on Comprehension , 2008 .

[36]  Becky Herr Stephenson,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out , 2010 .

[37]  K. Crawford.  Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media , 2009 .

[38]  G. Kirkup.  Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity , 2010 .

[39]  N. Selwyn.  Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook , 2009 .

[40]  Richard N. Katz.  Scholars, Scholarship, and the Scholarly Enterprise in the Digital Age. , 2010 .

[41]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Facebook® and academic performance , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[44]  Sian Bayne,et al.  The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[45]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age , 2009 .

[46]  Christine Greenhow.  Social Scholarship: Applying Social Networking Technologies to Research Practices. , 2009 .

[47]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[48]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Online Social Networking and Learning: What are the Interesting Research Questions? , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[49]  Teresa K. Rice.  Harvard Educational Review , 2008 .

[50]  Mika Raento,et al.  Making the ordinary visible in microblogs , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[51]  G. Veletsianos,et al.  Scholars and faculty members' lived experiences in online social networks , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[52]  Patricia G. Lange,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media . , 2010 .

[53]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[54]  R CottenShelia,et al.  A disappearing digital divide among college students , 2006 .

[55]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Zeynep Tufekci.  GROOMING, GOSSIP, FACEBOOK AND MYSPACE , 2008 .

[57]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[58]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[59]  T. Gowers,et al.  Massively collaborative mathematics , 2009, Nature.

[60]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing for Learning in an Open World , 2012 .

[61]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[62]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students , 2009 .

[63]  Shalin Hai-Jew.  The University Life Cafe: Promoting Students' Emotional Health , 2009 .

[64]  Michelle Hough,et al.  Keeping it to ourselves: Technology, privacy, and the loss of reserve , 2009 .

[65]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.