Groundwater Monitoring Network Design Using GIS and Multicriteria Analysis

The objective of this investigation was to use multicriteria analysis to analyze and model the main criteria that influence the optimal design of a network to monitor groundwater levels. The multicriteria analysis was performed using a GIS (IDRISI Selva). The Toluca Valley aquifer (Mexico) was chosen as the case study. The definition and importance of the criteria (factors and constraints) that influence the design of the monitoring network were based on available information and consultations with experts in the topic. The factors considered were: rate of decline in groundwater levels, decline in groundwater levels, rise in groundwater levels, cracks, vertical hydraulic gradient, and density of wells. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to weight the factors, resulting in a consistency ratio of 0.08. The weighted linear combination (WLC) method was then applied which resulted in a map identifying the locations of the priority areas to be monitored. The results show that 1.0 % of the study region corresponds to very high priority monitoring areas, 1.8 % to high priority areas, another 1.8 % to medium priority, 4.4 % to low priority and 91 % to very low priority monitoring areas. The proposed method can be used by government and public and private organizations to determine monitoring strategies that support water resources management.

[1]  Jeffry J. Stone,et al.  Multicriteria Analysis in an Irrigation District in Mexico , 2005 .

[3]  Francesco Mazzeo Rinaldi,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid in Supporting Decisions Related to Groundwater Protection , 2003, Environmental management.

[4]  H. D. Skilodimou,et al.  Mapping Urban Water Demands Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[5]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management , 2007 .

[6]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[7]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  Multi-objective, multiple participant decision support for water management in the Andarax catchment, Almeria , 2008 .

[8]  Yingqi Zhang,et al.  Least cost design of groundwater quality monitoring networks , 2005 .

[9]  Husam Baalousha,et al.  Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. , 2010 .

[10]  V. Uddameri,et al.  A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for establishing a regional-scale groundwater monitoring , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Anirban Dhar,et al.  Multiobjective Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network Under Epistemic Uncertainty , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[13]  Mei Xie,et al.  Application of analytical hierarchy process to water resources policy and management in Beijing, China , 1989 .

[14]  Enrique Cabrera,et al.  New method for urea analysis in surface and tap waters with LC-OCD-OND (liquid chromatography–organic carbon detection–organic nitrogen detection) , 2011 .

[15]  Oswald Marinoni,et al.  Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[16]  K. H. V. Durga Multi-criteria spatial decision analysis for forecasting urban water requirements: a case study of Dehradun city, India , 2005 .

[17]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multicriterion Decision Making , 1982 .

[18]  J. D. de Lima,et al.  Entropy and Multi-Objective Based Approach for Groundwater Quality Monitoring Network Assessment and Redesign , 2009 .

[19]  A. Cardona,et al.  Evaluation of hydrochemical changes due to intensive aquifer exploitation: case studies from Mexico , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[20]  Mohammed Lu’ay Jamal Froukh,et al.  Decision-Support System for Domestic Water Demand Forecasting and Management , 2001 .

[21]  Y. Wu Optimal design of a groundwater monitoring network in Daqing, China , 2004 .

[22]  Leon S. Lasdon,et al.  GROUP DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING USING MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[23]  H. E. Júnez-Ferreira,et al.  A geostatistical methodology for the optimal design of space–time hydraulic head monitoring networks and its application to the Valle de Querétaro aquifer , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[24]  René F. Reitsma,et al.  Structure and support of water-resources management and decision-making , 1996 .

[25]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Evaluating Management Strategies in Paraguacu River Basin by Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2002 .

[26]  Luis G. Vargas An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[27]  M. A. Martín del Campo,et al.  Impacts of urbanization on groundwater hydrodynamics and hydrochemistry of the Toluca Valley aquifer (Mexico) , 2014, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[28]  A. B. Petrangeli,et al.  Tailoring groundwater quality monitoring to vulnerability: a GIS procedure for network design , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[29]  B. Srdjevica,et al.  Evaluating Management Strategies in Paraguacu River Basin by Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2002 .

[30]  Víctor Hugo Garduño Monroy,et al.  Efectos de las fallas asociadas a sobreexplotación de acuíferos y la presencia de fallas potencialmente sísmicas en Morelia, Michoacán, México , 2001 .

[31]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[32]  V. Bense,et al.  Deformation mechanisms and hydraulic properties of fault zones in unconsolidated sediments; the Roer Valley Rift System, The Netherlands , 2003 .

[33]  René Therrien,et al.  Simulating pumping-induced regional land subsidence with the use of InSAR and field data in the Toluca Valley, Mexico , 2011 .

[34]  R. Eastman Guide to GIS and Image Processing , 1999 .

[35]  Michael Abert,et al.  New method for urea analysis in surface and tap waters with LC-OCD-OND (liquid chromatography–organic carbon detection–organic nitrogen detection) , 2011 .