Review of Urban Stormwater Quality Models: Deterministic, Stochastic, and Hybrid Approaches 1

Abstract:  The growing impact of urban stormwater on surface-water quality has illuminated the need for more accurate modeling of stormwater pollution. Water quality based regulation and the movement towards integrated urban water management place a similar demand for improved stormwater quality model predictions. The physical, chemical, and biological processes that affect stormwater quality need to be better understood and simulated, while acknowledging the costs and benefits that such complex modeling entails. This paper reviews three approaches to stormwater quality modeling: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid. Six deterministic, three stochastic, and three hybrid models are reviewed in detail. Hybrid approaches show strong potential for reducing stormwater quality model prediction error and uncertainty. Improved stormwater quality models will have wide ranging benefits for combined sewer overflow management, total maximum daily load development, best management practice design, land use change impact assessment, water quality trading, and integrated modeling.

[1]  M. Zug,et al.  COD modelling in sewer networks , 1998 .

[2]  John Doherty,et al.  Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  G Olsson,et al.  Instrumentation, control and automation in the water industry--state-of-the-art and new challenges. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Mousetrap: modelling of real sewer sediment characteristics and attached pollutants , 1995 .

[5]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Validation of Existing Bed Load Transport Formulas using In-Sewer Sediment , 2003 .

[6]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Modeling the atmospheric deposition and stormwater washoff of nitrogen compounds , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Ole Mark,et al.  MOUSETRAP: Modelling of water quality processes and the interaction of sediments and pollutants in sewers , 1995 .

[8]  R. Słowiński,et al.  Rough set approach to the evaluation of stormwater pollution , 1999 .

[9]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Modeling the Erosion of Mixtures of Organic and Granular In-Sewer Sediments , 2003 .

[10]  Ole Mark,et al.  MOUSETRAP — A DETERMINISTIC SEWER FLOW QUALITY MODEL , 1994 .

[11]  T. P. Brabets Quantity and quality of urban storm runoff from the Chester Creek basin Anchorage, Alaska , 1987 .

[12]  Thorkild Hvitved-Jacobsen,et al.  European Research into Sewer Sediments and Associated Pollutants and Processes , 2003 .

[13]  V. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Runoff quality prediction from small urban catchments using SWMM , 1998 .

[14]  M Zug,et al.  Long-term pollution simulation in combined sewer networks. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  On-line monitoring equipment for wastewater treatment processes: state of the art. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  John B. Braden,et al.  Balancing : The economic approach to sustainable water management , 1999 .

[17]  Klaus Scholz Stochastic simulation of urbanhydrological processes , 1997 .

[18]  Christopher G. Uchrin,et al.  A water quality management model for the Lakes Bay estuarine embayment 1: Receiving water quality model , 1995 .

[19]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[20]  Richard Ashley,et al.  A review of model development based on sewer sediments research in the uk , 1996 .

[21]  Reimer Herrmann,et al.  Modeling of dissolved and particle-bound pollutants in urban street runoff , 1997 .

[22]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[23]  M. Bergman,et al.  CALIBRATION OF STORM LOADS IN THE SOUTH PRONG WATERSHED, FLORIDA, USING BASINS/HSPF 1 , 2002 .

[24]  Richard Field,et al.  Sewer-Sediment Control: Overview of an Environmental Protection Agency Wet-Weather Flow Research Program , 2003 .

[25]  S. R. Ellis,et al.  Comparison of conceptually based and regression rainfall-runoff models, Denver Metropolitan area, Colorado, and potential applications in urban areas , 1987 .

[26]  Vladan Babovic,et al.  Hybrid Approach for Modeling Wet Weather Response in Wastewater Systems , 2003 .

[27]  J. J. Warwick,et al.  Estimating Uncertainty of Stormwater Runoff Computations , 1990 .

[28]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Modeling in-sewer deposit erosion to predict sewer flow quality , 2003 .

[29]  J. Suárez,et al.  Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM : a case study in Northern Spain , 2007 .

[30]  Barry J. Adams,et al.  A framework for urban storm water modeling and control analysis with analytical models , 2006 .

[31]  Brent M. Troutman,et al.  Regression models for estimating urban storm-runoff quality and quantity in the United States , 1989 .

[32]  Barry J. Adams,et al.  Runoff quality analysis of urban catchments with analytical probabilistic models , 2006 .

[33]  M Boller,et al.  Dynamic behavior of suspended pollutants and particle size distribution in highway runoff. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Christopher Zoppou,et al.  Review of urban storm water models , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[35]  W. M. Alley,et al.  Multi-event urban runoff quality model , 1982 .

[36]  H. R. Whiteley,et al.  Calibration of the Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) model using automatic calibration and geographical information systems , 2002 .

[37]  M Zug,et al.  Use of real time control modelling on the urban sewage system of Nancy. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[38]  D. K. Borah,et al.  WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF MATHEMATICAL BASES , 2003 .

[39]  M K Stenstrom,et al.  Evaluation of urban non-point source runoff of hazardous metals entering Santa Monica Bay, California. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  R. Nicolai,et al.  Biofilter media mixture ratio of wood chips and compost treating swine odors. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  J. Doherty,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR CALIBRATION AND PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS OF A WATERSHED MODEL 1 , 2003 .

[42]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Deterministic modelling of integrated urban drainage systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Movement of total suspended solids in combined sewers , 2003 .

[44]  Zhulu Lin,et al.  Automatic Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Analysis of a Semidistributed Watershed Model , 2006 .

[45]  J. Vaze,et al.  Comparative evaluation of urban storm water quality models , 2003 .

[46]  Jean-Pierre Villeneuve,et al.  Information technologies in a wider perspective: integrating management functions across the urban-rural interface , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  M Häck,et al.  Online load measurement in combined sewer systems--possibilities of an integrated management of waste water transportation and treatment. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[48]  M. Bruce Beck Vulnerability of water quality in intensively developing urban watersheds , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  L. David,et al.  Wet weather water quality modelling of a Portuguese urban catchment: difficulties and benefits. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[50]  J. F. Cruise,et al.  MODELING THE BUILDUP AND WASHOFF OF POLLUTANTS ON URBAN WATERSHEDS 1 , 1996 .

[51]  John J. Sansalone,et al.  Prediction of Gradation-Based Heavy Metal Mass Using Granulometric Indices of Snowmelt Particles , 2004 .

[52]  Ghassan Chebbo,et al.  Application of MCMC-GSA model calibration method to urban runoff quality modeling , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[53]  Yves Zech,et al.  Evaluation of a distributed model for urban catchments using a 7-year continuous data series , 2000 .

[54]  O Thomas,et al.  Trends in optical monitoring. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[55]  P. Smith,et al.  SIMULATION OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF STORM RUNOFF FOR URBAN CATCHMENTS IN FRESNO, CALIFORNIA , 1988 .

[56]  John Doherty,et al.  Efficient accommodation of local minima in watershed model calibration , 2006 .

[57]  J. J. Warwick,et al.  Efficacy of SWMM Application , 1991 .

[58]  A. Goonetilleke,et al.  Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[59]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future , 1996 .

[60]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  SIMULATING HYDROLOGIC AND WATER QUALITY IMPACTS IN AN URBANIZING WATERSHED 1 , 2003 .

[61]  Barrie M. Peake,et al.  Partitioning of metals (Fe, Pb, Cu, Zn) in urban run‐off from the Kaikorai Valley, Dunedin, New Zealand , 2001 .

[62]  M Ahyerre,et al.  Test of the efficiency of three storm water quality models with a rich set of data. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[63]  Anne E. Carey,et al.  Water quality modeling of the Cahaba River, Alabama , 2004 .

[64]  Ning Gong,et al.  Neural networks for solid transport modelling in sewer systems during storm events , 1996 .

[65]  F Schlütter,et al.  Dynamic modelling of pollutants from CSOs. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[66]  Anne B. Hoos Improving Regional-Model Estimates of Urban-Runoff Quality Using Local Data , 1996 .

[67]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Partitioning Analog for Metal Elements in Urban Rainfall-Runoff Overland Flow Using the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number Concept , 2004 .

[68]  Lars Yde,et al.  Real time control of the sewer system of Boulogne Billancourt — A contribution to improving the water quality of the Seine , 1998 .

[69]  W. M. Alley,et al.  Distributed routing rainfall-runoff model; version II , 1982 .

[70]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of the scouring effects of flushing waves on sediment deposits , 2004 .

[71]  John J. Sansalone,et al.  ACCRETION AND PARTITIONING OF HEAVY METALS ASSOCIATED WITH SNOW EXPOSED TO URBAN TRAFFIC AND WINTER STORM MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES. II , 2002 .

[72]  J. B. Ellis,et al.  Urban Drainage: Impacts on Receiving Water Quality , 1993 .

[73]  K. Schiff,et al.  Assessment of efficient sampling designs for urban stormwater monitoring. , 2002, Water research.

[74]  Jacques W. Delleur,et al.  New Results and Research Needs on Sediment Movement in Urban Drainage , 2001 .

[75]  G Chebbo,et al.  Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[76]  M. Gromaire,et al.  The experimental urban catchment ‘Le Marais’ in Paris: what lessons can be learned from it? , 2004 .

[77]  M. Zug,et al.  Pollution wash-off modelling on impervious surfaces : Calibration, validation, transposition , 1999 .

[78]  Richard J Jackson,et al.  Public health effects of inadequately managed stormwater runoff. , 2003, American journal of public health.