Knowledge Checking Service Selection Method in Pythagorean Fuzzy Environment

Knowledge checking service is very important for safeguarding the quality of the knowledge in the knowledge repository. There are many knowledge checking services with similar functions but different qualities in organizations, especially in the crossing organizations. It is not easy to measure the non-functional criteria because of the complexity and the involvement of user's fuzzy perceptions of knowledge checking services. In order to help the evaluation and selection of the knowledge checking services, the knowledge checking services selection method in Pythagorean fuzzy environment is developed. Firstly, decision makers use linguistic terms to express their preferences on the alternative knowledge checking services with respect to each criterion. Afterwards, the linguistic terms are transformed into the Pythagorean fuzzy forms. Then the collective opinions are derived by aggregating the opinion given by each decision maker. After calculating the degree of linguistic grey relational coefficient of each alternative from PIS and NIS, the relative relational degree of each alternative from PIS are derived. Then all the alternatives are ranked in accordance with the relative relational degree in descending order. The illustrative example of knowledge service selection shows the proposed method is feasible and efficient.

[1]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  Haisu Zhang,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Role of Cooperation, Competition, and Alliance Nationality , 2010 .

[4]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  Managing business intelligence in a virtual enterprise: A case study and knowledge management lessons learned , 2003, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[5]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy subsets , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Ping Wang,et al.  QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer's vague perception , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  B. Rubenstein-Montano,et al.  A systems thinking framework for knowledge management , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap Between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality , 2013 .

[10]  Firoozeh Salardini,et al.  An AHP-GRA method for asset allocation: A case study of investment firms on Tehran Stock Exchange , 2013 .

[11]  G. McLean,et al.  Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management , 2010 .

[12]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Using linguistic preferences and grey relational analysis to evaluate the environmental knowledge management capacity , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  R. Noe,et al.  Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems , 2014 .

[14]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .

[15]  Sofy Carayannopoulos,et al.  External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach , 2010 .

[16]  San-yang Liu,et al.  An extended GRA method for MCDM with interval-valued triangular fuzzy assessments and unknown weights , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[17]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[18]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[19]  Kees Wevers,et al.  Grey System Theory and Applications: A Way Forward , 2007 .

[20]  K. Wiig Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? , 1997 .