Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of head motion on the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Materials and Methods Fifteen dry skulls were incorporated into a motion controller which simulated four types of head motion during CBCT scan: 2 horizontal rotations (to the right/to the left) and 2 vertical rotations (upward/downward). Each movement was triggered to occur at the start of the scan for 1 second by remote control. Four maxillofacial surface models with head motion and one control surface model without motion were obtained for each skull. Nine landmarks were identified on the five maxillofacial surface models for each skull, and landmark identification errors were compared between the control model and each of the models with head motion. Results Rendered surface models with head motion were similar to the control model in appearance; however, the landmark identification errors showed larger values in models with head motion than in the control. In particular, the Porion in the horizontal rotation models presented statistically significant differences (P < .05). Statistically significant difference in the errors between the right and left side landmark was present in the left side rotation which was opposite direction to the scanner rotation (P < .05). Conclusions Patient movement during CBCT scan might cause landmark identification errors on the 3D surface model in relation to the direction of the scanner rotation. Clinicians should take this into consideration to prevent patient movement during CBCT scan, particularly horizontal movement.

[1]  William R Proffit,et al.  Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Reduction of motion blurring artifacts using respiratory gated CT in sinogram space: a quantitative evaluation. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  Joyoni Dey,et al.  Estimation and correction of cardiac respiratory motion in SPECT in the presence of limited-angle effects due to irregular respiration. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Thomas Rodet,et al.  The cone-beam algorithm of Feldkamp, Davis, and Kress preserves oblique line integrals. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Xia,et al.  Surgical navigation in correction of hemimandibular hyperplasia: a new treatment strategy. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Franz Kainberger,et al.  Quantification and Clinical Relevance of Head Motion During Computed Tomography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[8]  B. De Man,et al.  Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  K. Mueller,et al.  Anti-aliased three-dimensional cone-beam reconstruction of low-contrast objects with algebraic methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Allan G Farman,et al.  A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. , 2012, Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[11]  Stavros Kiliaridis,et al.  Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  S J Riederer,et al.  A prospective approach to correct for inter‐image head rotation in FMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Sotirios Tetradis,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography imaging in the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. , 2010, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[14]  Yi Sun,et al.  Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study. , 2013, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[15]  J Martin Palomo,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Lutz Tellmann,et al.  Motion artifact reduction on parametric PET images of neuroreceptor binding. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  Jaroslav Dusek,et al.  Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[19]  Manuel O Lagravère,et al.  Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[20]  Liang Li,et al.  Experimental measurement of human head motion for clinical dental CBCT system design , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  D. Hatcher,et al.  Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[23]  K Donaldson,et al.  Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[24]  H. Alamri,et al.  Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature. , 2012, General dentistry.

[25]  Reyes Enciso,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  Matteo Bettuzzi,et al.  Relevance of head motion in dental cone-beam CT scanner images depending on patient positioning , 2008, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[27]  Allan G Farman,et al.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.