Effects of Different Levels of Variability and Pressure Support Ventilation on Lung Function in Patients With Mild–Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Variable pressure support ventilation (vPSV) is an assisted ventilation mode that varies the level of pressure support on a breath-by-breath basis to restore the physiological variability of breathing activity. We aimed to compare the effects of vPSV at different levels of variability and pressure support (ΔPS) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This study was a crossover randomized clinical trial. We included patients with mild to moderate ARDS already ventilated in conventional pressure support ventilation (PSV). The study consisted of two blocks of interventions, and variability during vPSV was set as the coefficient of variation of the ΔPS level. In the first block, the effects of three levels of variability were tested at constant ΔPS: 0% (PSV0%, conventional PSV), 15% (vPSV15%), and 30% (vPSV30%). In the second block, two levels of variability (0% and variability set to achieve ±5 cmH2O variability) were tested at two ΔPS levels (baseline ΔPS and ΔPS reduced by 5 cmH2O from baseline). The following four ventilation strategies were tested in the second block: PSV with baseline ΔPS and 0% variability (PSVBL) or ±5 cmH2O variability (vPSVBL), PSV with ΔPS reduced by 5 cmH2O and 0% variability (PSV−5) or ±5 cmH2O variability (vPSV−5). Outcomes included gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and patient-ventilator asynchronies. Results: The study enrolled 20 patients. In the first block of interventions, oxygenation and respiratory mechanics parameters did not differ between vPSV15% and vPSV30% compared with PSV0%. The variability of tidal volume (VT) was higher with vPSV15% and vPSV30% compared with PSV0%. The incidence of asynchronies and the variability of transpulmonary pressure (PL) were higher with vPSV30% compared with PSV0%. In the second block of interventions, different levels of pressure support with and without variability did not change oxygenation. The variability of VT and PL was higher with vPSV−5 compared with PSV−5, but not with vPSVBL compared with PSVBL. Conclusion: In patients with mild-moderate ARDS, the addition of variability did not improve oxygenation at different pressure support levels. Moreover, high variability levels were associated with worse patient-ventilator synchrony. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01683669.

[1]  A. Kuriyama,et al.  Proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Annals of Intensive Care.

[2]  L. Steuten,et al.  Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA.

[3]  A. Colombo,et al.  Opening pressures and atelectrauma in acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2017, Intensive Care Medicine.

[4]  Giacomo Bellani,et al.  Effects of Variable Pressure Support Ventilation on Regional Homogeneity and Aeration. , 2017, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[5]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE Study , 2017, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  M. Andreeff,et al.  Comparative Effects of Volutrauma and Atelectrauma on Lung Inflammation in Experimental Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2016, Critical care medicine.

[7]  P. Pelosi,et al.  General Anesthesia Closes the Lungs: Keep Them Resting. , 2016, Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation.

[8]  Francesco Mojoli,et al.  Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives , 2016, Intensive Care Medicine.

[9]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Variable ventilation from bench to bedside , 2016, Critical Care.

[10]  Anders Larsson,et al.  Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. , 2016, JAMA.

[11]  Robert M. Kacmarek,et al.  Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality , 2015, Intensive Care Medicine.

[12]  Stefano Nava,et al.  The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure. , 2014, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Rationale and study design of ViPS – variable pressure support for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled open trial , 2013, Trials.

[14]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Short-term effects of noisy pressure support ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure , 2013, Critical Care.

[15]  A. Anzueto,et al.  Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Comparative effects of proportional assist and variable pressure support ventilation on lung function and damage in experimental lung injury* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[17]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Pressure support improves oxygenation and lung protection compared to pressure-controlled ventilation and is further improved by random variation of pressure support* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[18]  T. Koga,et al.  Effect of Low - , 2011 .

[19]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Noisy pressure support ventilation: A pilot study on a new assisted ventilation mode in experimental lung injury* , 2008, Critical care medicine.

[20]  N Mutz,et al.  Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  K. Muller,et al.  Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications. , 1992, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[22]  Keith E. Muller,et al.  Approximate Power for Repeated-Measures ANOVA Lacking Sphericity , 1989 .

[23]  M A Sackner,et al.  Variability of resting respiratory drive and timing in healthy subjects. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  K Numata,et al.  [General anesthesia]. , 1968, Kangogaku zasshi.