Low-Carbon Development for Mexico

One of the most compelling reasons for pursuing low-carbon development is that the potential impacts of climate change are predicted to be severe, for both industrial and developing countries, and that reducing greenhouse gas emissions can reduce the risk of the most catastrophic impacts. The challenge of reducing emissions is sobering: leading scientific models indicate that limiting the rise in global mean temperatures to less than two degree Celsius will require that global greenhouse gas emissions peak within the next 10-15 years and then fall by 2050 to levels about 50 percent lower than in 1990. Although many countries recognize the need to curtail carbon emissions, there is considerable uncertainty about how much this will cost in individual countries, what measures can be undertaken in both the short and longer term, and how cost-effective specific interventions are in reducing emissions. This study analyzes a range of energy efficiency options available in Mexico, including supply-side efficiency improvements in the electric power and oil and gas industries, and demand-side electricity efficiency measures addressing high-growth energy-consuming activities, such as air conditioning and refrigeration. It also evaluates a range of renewable energy options that make use of the country's vast wind, solar, biomass, hydro, and geothermal resources.

[1]  Michael A. McNeil,et al.  Assessment of the Impacts of Standards and Labeling Programs inMexico (four products). , 2007 .

[2]  O. Masera,et al.  Forestry Mitigation Options for Mexico: Finding Synergies between National Sustainable Development Priorities and Global Concerns , 2001 .

[3]  John R. Benemann,et al.  Biomass Energy Economics , 1980 .

[4]  Setting Mitigation Goals for Sectoral Programs: A Preliminary Case Study of Mexico’s Cement and Oil Refining Sectors , 2009 .

[5]  Thomas Auerbach,et al.  McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology , 1961 .

[6]  Anthony Downs,et al.  The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited , 1998 .

[7]  Michael A. McNeil,et al.  Future Air Conditioning Energy Consumption in Developing Countriesand what can be done about it: The Potential of Efficiency in theResidential Sector , 2007 .

[8]  D. Snowden,et al.  A leader's framework for decision making , 2007 .

[9]  Pablo Fajnzylber,et al.  Low Carbon, High Growth Latin American Responses To Climate Change , 2009 .

[10]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[11]  Mark Houdashelt,et al.  Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture , 2008 .

[12]  K. Asmal Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. The report of the World Commission on dams. , 2000 .

[13]  Frederic P. Miller,et al.  IPCC fourth assessment report , 2009 .

[14]  Omar Masera,et al.  Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking : Case study in rural Mexico , 2007 .

[15]  Dirk Pauschert Study of equipment prices in the power sector , 2009 .

[16]  J. Halpern,et al.  Residential Electricity Subsidies in Mexico: Exploring Options for Reform and for Enhancing the Impact on the Poor , 2009 .

[17]  O. Masera MITIGATING CARBON EMISSIONS WHILE ADVANCING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES: THE CASE OF MEXICO , 2001 .

[18]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Ouantification of carbon savings from improved biomass cookstove projects. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  David Pennise,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from charcoal making in Kenya and Brazil , 2001 .

[20]  Robert P. Taylor,et al.  Financing energy efficiency : lessons from Brazil, China, India, and beyond , 2008 .

[21]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  In-field greenhouse gas emissions from cookstoves in rural Mexican households , 2008 .

[22]  Semarnat. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales,et al.  México Tercera Comunicación Nacional ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. , 2006 .

[23]  J. Dargay,et al.  Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030 , 2007 .

[24]  Anant Phadke,et al.  Dams and Development , 2002 .

[25]  Marc Schattenmann,et al.  IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency , 2000, A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations.

[26]  C. Robledo,et al.  INITIAL ANALYSIS ON THE MITIGATION POTENTIAL IN THE FORESTRY SECTOR , 2007 .

[27]  Roy Boyd,et al.  Extreme climate events and adaptation: an exploratory analysis of drought in Mexico , 2009, Environment and Development Economics.

[28]  Comité Intersecretarial de Cambio Climático Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero 1990-2002. , 2006 .

[29]  Omar Masera,et al.  Reduction in personal exposures to particulate matter and carbon monoxide as a result of the installation of a Patsari improved cook stove in Michoacan Mexico. , 2008, Indoor air.

[30]  Perú. Consejo Nacional del Ambiente Estrategía nacional de cambio climático , 2002 .

[31]  W. Vergara Climate Hotspots: Climate-Induced Ecosystem Damage in Latin America , 2008 .

[32]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case , 2005 .

[33]  J. P. Cole,et al.  Proyecciones de la población de México , 1974 .