An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model

Studies with single, multistage and formulated cleaning regimes have been evaluated for sintered stainless steel and ceramic microfiltration membranes. Results demonstrate the existence of cleaning agent concentration and temperature optima, whilst the effect of increasing crossflow velocity showed minimal increase in flux, and increasing transmembrane pressure showed a decrease in cleaning performance. A qualitative model has been developed which describes the existence of a three species deposit with each species having different removal characteristics. An initial flux increase during cleaning is explained in terms of the removal of loosely bound material which is readily solubilised by caustic solutions. Subsequent flux recovery is explained in terms of changes in deposit morphology that occur on contact with the cleaning agent. Residual fouling, present after the cleaning procedure, accounts for losses in the pristine permeability and selectivity of the membrane.

[1]  B. T. D. L. Fuente,et al.  Study of the fouling of a mineral microfiltration membrane using scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical analyses in the processing of milk , 1988, Journal of Dairy Research.

[2]  P. Jelen,et al.  The Effect of Cleaning Agents on a Noncellulosic Ultrafiltration Membrane , 1985 .

[3]  F. Kerherve,et al.  Efficiency of cleaning agents for an inorganic membrane after milk ultrafiltration , 1992, Journal of Dairy Research.

[4]  A. G. Fane.  Fouling and cleaning in food processing : Papers presented at the third international conference on fouling and cleaning held at Prien, Germany, June 5-7, 1989, H.G. Kessler and D.B. Lund (Eds. , 1990 .

[5]  W. Bowen,et al.  Pulsed electrokinetic cleaning of cellulose nitrate microfiltration membranes , 1992 .

[6]  A. Jönsson,et al.  Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes after treatment of oily waste water , 1994 .

[7]  T. Robbertsen,et al.  The anti-fouling action of polymers preadsorbed on ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes , 1993 .

[8]  R. L. Merson,et al.  Examination of cottage cheese whey proteins by scanning electron microscopy: relationship to membrane fouling during ultrafiltration. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  J. Howell,et al.  Effects of concentration boundary layer development on the flux limitations in ultrafiltration , 1989 .

[10]  J. Howell,et al.  Hydrodynamics and Membrane Filtration , 1991 .

[11]  K. E. Smith,et al.  Ineffective Cleaning of Polysulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane Systems and Corrosion by Bisulfite Used as a Sanitizer , 1986 .

[12]  R. Bradley,et al.  Effective cleaning and sanitizing of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane systems. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  R. J. Lahiere,et al.  Ceramic membrane treatment of petrochemical wastewater , 1993 .

[14]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Ultrafiltration of whey protein solutions in spacer-filled flat channels , 1993 .

[15]  M. R. Bird,et al.  Cleaning of food process plant. , 1993 .

[16]  Vicki Chen,et al.  The use of anionic surfactants for reducing fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: their effects and optimization , 1992 .

[17]  M. Mackley,et al.  Cake filtration mechanisms in steady and unsteady flows , 1993 .

[18]  M. K. Turner,et al.  Effective Industrial Membrane Processes: Benefits and Opportunities , 1991 .

[19]  U. Merin,et al.  Fouling during constant flux crossflow microfiltration of pretreated whey. Influence of transmembrane pressure gradient , 1993 .

[20]  F. Kerherve,et al.  Cleaning of inorganic membranes after whey and milk ultrafiltration , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  R. Zall,et al.  Combining polymers with chemical, thermal, and turbulent conditions to clean an ultrafiltration membrane fouled with milk , 1990 .

[22]  C. W. Robinson,et al.  Pulsed-electric-field crossflow ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin , 1993 .

[23]  A. Fane,et al.  The cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by protein , 1993 .